ProTox: a web server for the in silico prediction of rodent oral toxicity

Animal trials are currently the major method for determining the possible toxic effects of drug candidates and cosmetics. In silico prediction methods represent an alternative approach and aim to rationalize the preclinical drug development, thus enabling the reduction of the associated time, costs and animal experiments. Here, we present ProTox, a web server for the prediction of rodent oral toxicity. The prediction method is based on the analysis of the similarity of compounds with known median lethal doses (LD50) and incorporates the identification of toxic fragments, therefore representing a novel approach in toxicity prediction. In addition, the web server includes an indication of possible toxicity targets which is based on an in-house collection of protein–ligand-based pharmacophore models (‘toxicophores’) for targets associated with adverse drug reactions. The ProTox web server is open to all users and can be accessed without registration at: http://tox.charite.de/tox. The only requirement for the prediction is the two-dimensional structure of the input compounds. All ProTox methods have been evaluated based on a diverse external validation set and displayed strong performance (sensitivity, specificity and precision of 76, 95 and 75%, respectively) and superiority over other toxicity prediction tools, indicating their possible applicability for other compound classes.

[1]  Luis G Valerio,et al.  In silico toxicology for the pharmaceutical sciences. , 2009, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[2]  David Rogers,et al.  Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[3]  Michael M. Hann,et al.  RECAP-Retrosynthetic Combinatorial Analysis Procedure: A Powerful New Technique for Identifying Privileged Molecular Fragments with Useful Applications in Combinatorial Chemistry , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[4]  Corinna Blasse,et al.  FragmentStore—a comprehensive database of fragments linking metabolites, toxic molecules and drugs , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  A. Bender,et al.  Analysis of Pharmacology Data and the Prediction of Adverse Drug Reactions and Off‐Target Effects from Chemical Structure , 2007, ChemMedChem.

[6]  Donald Rubin,et al.  Estimating Causal Effects from Large Data Sets Using Propensity Scores , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  Michael J. Keiser,et al.  Large Scale Prediction and Testing of Drug Activity on Side-Effect Targets , 2012, Nature.

[8]  Adrià Cereto-Massagué,et al.  DecoyFinder: an easy-to-use python GUI application for building target-specific decoy sets , 2012, Bioinform..

[9]  Chris Morley,et al.  Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox , 2011, J. Cheminformatics.

[10]  Didier Rognan,et al.  Protein-Ligand-Based Pharmacophores: Generation and Utility Assessment in Computational Ligand Profiling , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[11]  Michael J. Keiser,et al.  Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  Matthew D Segall,et al.  Addressing toxicity risk when designing and selecting compounds in early drug discovery. , 2014, Drug discovery today.

[14]  Yufeng Liu,et al.  Relating Anatomical Therapeutic Indications by the Ensemble Similarity of Drug Sets , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[15]  Guixia Liu,et al.  Performance Evaluation of 2D Fingerprint and 3D Shape Similarity Methods in Virtual Screening , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[16]  Philip E. Bourne,et al.  SuperTarget goes quantitative: update on drug–target interactions , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  Cornelis Brekelmans,et al.  The European partnership for alternative approaches to animal testing , 2007 .

[18]  Xin Wen,et al.  BindingDB: a web-accessible database of experimentally determined protein–ligand binding affinities , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  Ulrike Schmidt,et al.  SuperToxic: a comprehensive database of toxic compounds , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  ZINC - A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[21]  Robert B. Russell,et al.  SuperTarget and Matador: resources for exploring drug-target relationships , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[22]  Michael M. Mysinger,et al.  Directory of Useful Decoys, Enhanced (DUD-E): Better Ligands and Decoys for Better Benchmarking , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[23]  David W. Ritchie,et al.  GES Polypharmacology Fingerprints: A Novel Approach for Drug Repositioning , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[24]  Wolfgang Muster,et al.  Computational toxicology in drug development. , 2008, Drug discovery today.

[25]  Monica Campillos,et al.  HitPick: a web server for hit identification and target prediction of chemical screenings , 2013, Bioinform..

[26]  Jie Shen,et al.  admetSAR: A Comprehensive Source and Free Tool for Assessment of Chemical ADMET Properties , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[27]  A. Bender,et al.  Modeling Promiscuity Based on in vitro Safety Pharmacology Profiling Data , 2007, ChemMedChem.

[28]  Daniela Schuster,et al.  3D pharmacophores as tools for activity profiling. , 2010, Drug discovery today. Technologies.

[29]  K. Thai,et al.  Pharmacophore modeling for antitargets. , 2013, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.