Metacognitive processes for uncertainty handling: Connectionist implementation of a cognitive model

An empirically based cognitive model of real-world decision making was implemented in Shruti, a system capable of rapid, parallel relational reasoning. The system effectively simulates a two-tiered strategy associated with proficient decisions makers: Recognitional or reflexive activation of expectations and associated responses, accompanied by an optional, recursive process of critiquing and correcting, regulated by the stakes of the problem, the time available, and the remaining uncertainty. The model and implementation are inconsistent with the conventional claim that decision makers fall back on formal analytical methods when pattern recognition fails. Instead, they learn simple metacognitive strategies to leverage reflexive knowledge in novel situations. In addition, the model suggests that the development of executive attention functions (metacognitive strategies) may be necessary for, and integral to, the development of working memory, or dynamic access to long term memory, and that strategies developed for uncertainty handling may accelerate the reflexive learning of remotely connected concepts.

[1]  Lokendra Shastri,et al.  Advances in SHRUTI—A Neurally Motivated Model of Relational Knowledge Representation and Rapid Inference Using Temporal Synchrony , 1999, Applied Intelligence.

[2]  D. R. Mani,et al.  Massively parallel knowledge representation and reasoning: Taking a cue from the brain , 1997, Parallel Processing for Artificial Intelligence 3.

[3]  Jared Freeman,et al.  Critical thinking skills in tactical decision making: A model and a training strategy. , 1998 .

[4]  Bryan B. Thompson,et al.  6. Training teams to take initiative: Critical thinking in novel situations , 2001 .

[5]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[6]  L. Shastri,et al.  A Connectionist Treatment of Negation and Inconsistency , 1996 .

[7]  J. Freeman,et al.  Integrated Critical Thinking Training and Decision Support for Tactical Anti-Air Warfare , 2002 .

[8]  Raanan Lipshitz,et al.  Decision Making in Three Modes , 1994 .

[9]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[10]  Marvin S. Cohen,et al.  Metarecognition in Time-Stressed Decision Making: Recognizing, Critiquing, and Correcting , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[11]  Lokendra Shastri,et al.  Soft Computing in SHRUTI - A Neurally Plausible Model of Reflexive Reasoning and Relational Information Processing , 1999, IIA/SOCO.

[12]  K. R. Hammond Judgments Under Stress , 1999 .

[13]  L. Shastri,et al.  From simple associations to systematic reasoning: A connectionist representation of rules, variables and dynamic bindings using temporal synchrony , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  Lokendra Shastri,et al.  Types and Quantifiers in SHRUTI: A Connectionist Model of Rapid Reasoning and Relational Processing , 1998, Hybrid Neural Systems.