Tumor treating fields therapy device for glioblastoma: physics and clinical practice considerations

Alternating electric fields therapy, as delivered by the tumor treating fields device, is a new modality of cancer treatment that has been approved by the US FDA for recurrent glioblastoma. At a frequency of 200 kHz, these fields emanate from transducer arrays on the surface of the patient’s scalp into the brain and perturb processes necessary for cytokinesis during tumor cell mitosis. In the registration Phase III trial for recurrent glioblastoma patients, the efficacy of the tumor treating fields as monotherapy was equivalent to chemotherapy, while scalp irritation was its major adverse event compared with systemic toxicities that were associated with cytotoxic chemotherapies. Alternating electric fields therapy is, therefore, an essential option for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Here, we summarize our current knowledge of the physics, cell biology and clinical data supporting the use of the tumor treating fields therapy.

[1]  Charles Scott,et al.  NT-40Interim Analysis of the EF-14 Trial: A Prospective, Multi-center Trial of NovoTTF-100A Together With Temozolomide Compared to Temozolomide Alone in Patients with Newly Diagnosed GBM , 2014 .

[2]  Qing Wang,et al.  Ferroelectric polymer networks with high energy density and improved discharged efficiency for dielectric energy storage , 2013, Nature Communications.

[3]  G. La Torre,et al.  A Systematic Review of Resectability and Survival After Concurrent Chemoradiation in Primarily Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[4]  Joseph K Salama,et al.  The chemoradiation paradigm in head and neck cancer , 2007, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[5]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[6]  A. Friedman,et al.  Bevacizumab continuation beyond initial bevacizumab progression among recurrent glioblastoma patients , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  L. Zitvogel,et al.  Selective Resistance of Tetraploid Cancer Cells against DNA Damage‐Induced Apoptosis , 2006, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  E. Wong,et al.  NovoTTF-100A: a new treatment modality for recurrent glioblastoma , 2012, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.

[9]  Jaime Prilusky,et al.  A server and database for dipole moments of proteins , 2007, Environmental health perspectives.

[10]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  Dielectric Properties of Solid Tumors During Nonnothermia and Hyperthermia , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  S. Gautam,et al.  Dexamethasone exerts profound immunologic interference on treatment efficacy for recurrent glioblastoma , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  M. Krummel,et al.  The septin cytoskeleton facilitates membrane retraction during motility and blebbing , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  P. Gutin,et al.  NovoTTF-100A versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[14]  E. Dekel,et al.  Disruption of cancer cell replication by alternating electric fields. , 2004, Cancer research.

[15]  J. Vymazal,et al.  Chemotherapeutic treatment efficacy and sensitivity are increased by adjuvant alternating electric fields (TTFields) , 2009, BMC medical physics.

[16]  N. Butowski,et al.  Clinical practice experience with NovoTTF-100A™ system for glioblastoma: The Patient Registry Dataset (PRiDe). , 2014, Seminars in oncology.

[17]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[18]  P. Basser,et al.  Predicting the electric field distribution in the brain for the treatment of glioblastoma , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  J. Folkman,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis: a quantitative method for histologic grading. , 1972, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  Georg Breier,et al.  Vascular endothelial growth factor is a potential tumour angiogenesis factor in human gliomas in vivo , 1992, Nature.

[21]  E. Dekel,et al.  Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Frederick J. Milford,et al.  Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory , 1961 .

[23]  F. Lieberman,et al.  Response assessment of NovoTTF-100A versus best physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma , 2013, Cancer medicine.

[24]  K. Aldape,et al.  A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  E. Neufeld,et al.  IT’IS Database for Thermal and Electromagnetic Parameters of Biological Tissues , 2012 .

[26]  M. Lacouture,et al.  Characterization and management of dermatologic adverse events with the NovoTTF-100A System, a novel anti-mitotic electric field device for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. , 2014, Seminars in oncology.

[27]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  E. Kirson,et al.  Alternating electric fields (TTFields) inhibit metastatic spread of solid tumors to the lungs , 2009, Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

[29]  T. W. Athey,et al.  Dielectric properties of animal tissues in vivo at frequencies 10 MHz--1 GHz. , 1981, Bioelectromagnetics.

[30]  E. Wong Tumor growth, invasion, and angiogenesis in malignant gliomas , 2006, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[31]  L. Zitvogel,et al.  Molecular determinants of immunogenic cell death: surface exposure of calreticulin makes the difference , 2007, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[32]  E. Wong,et al.  Tumor Treating Fields Perturb the Localization of Septins and Cause Aberrant Mitotic Exit , 2015, PloS one.

[33]  J. Urschel,et al.  A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery to surgery alone for resectable esophageal cancer. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[34]  J. Keller,et al.  Long-term survival of patients suffering from glioblastoma multiforme treated with tumor-treating fields , 2012, World Journal of Surgical Oncology.

[35]  K. Hoang-Xuan,et al.  Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  R. Voll,et al.  Immunosuppressive effects of apoptotic cells , 1997, Nature.

[37]  F. F. Ibrahim,et al.  The Diagnostic Potential of Dielectric Properties, Telomerase Activity and Cytokeratin 20 in Urine Cells of Bladder Cancer Patients , 2012 .

[38]  H. Fine,et al.  Bevacizumab for malignant gliomas. , 2010, Archives of neurology.

[39]  J. Urschel,et al.  A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery to surgery alone for resectable esophageal cancer. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[40]  A. Fauci Mechanisms of corticosteroid action on lymphocyte subpopulations. II. Differential effects of in vivo hydrocortisone, prednisone and dexamethasone on in vitro expression of lymphocyte function. , 1976, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[41]  S. Piantadosi,et al.  Immunosuppression in Patients with High-Grade Gliomas Treated with Radiation and Temozolomide , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[42]  John A Butman,et al.  Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.