Does multilocus inherited neoplasia alleles syndrome have severe clinical expression?

Importance Genetic testing of hereditary cancer using comprehensive gene panels can identify patients with more than one pathogenic mutation in high and/or moderate-risk-associated cancer genes. This phenomenon is known as multilocus inherited neoplasia alleles syndrome (MINAS), which has been potentially linked to more severe clinical manifestations. Objective To determine the prevalence and clinical features of MINAS in a large cohort of adult patients with hereditary cancer homogeneously tested with the same gene panel. Patients and methods A cohort of 1023 unrelated patients with suspicion of hereditary cancer was screened using a validated panel including up to 135 genes associated with hereditary cancer and phakomatoses. Results Thirteen (1.37%) patients harbouring two pathogenic mutations in dominant cancer-predisposing genes were identified, representing 5.7% (13/226) of patients with pathogenic mutations. Most (10/13) of these cases presented clinical manifestations associated with only one of the mutations identified. One case showed mutations in MEN1 and MLH1 and developed tumours associated with both cancer syndromes. Interestingly, three of the double mutants had a young age of onset or severe breast cancer phenotype and carried mutations in moderate to low-risk DNA damage repair-associated genes; two of them presented biallelic inactivation of CHEK2. We included these two patients for the sake of their clinical interest although we are aware that they do not exactly fulfil the definition of MINAS since both mutations are in the same gene. Conclusions and relevance Genetic analysis of a broad cancer gene panel identified the largest series of patients with MINAS described in a single study. Overall, our data do not support the existence of more severe manifestations in double mutants at the time of diagnosis although they do confirm previous evidence of severe phenotype in biallelic CHEK2 and other DNA repair cancer-predisposing genes.

[1]  William J. Astle,et al.  Comprehensive Cancer-Predisposition Gene Testing in an Adult Multiple Primary Tumor Series Shows a Broad Range of Deleterious Variants and Atypical Tumor Phenotypes , 2018, American journal of human genetics.

[2]  Robert Huether,et al.  Associations Between Cancer Predisposition Testing Panel Genes and Breast Cancer , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[3]  C. Lázaro,et al.  A comprehensive custom panel design for routine hereditary cancer testing: preserving control, improving diagnostics and revealing a complex variation landscape , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[4]  D. Sussman,et al.  Co-occurrence of Lynch syndrome and juvenile polyposis syndrome confirmed by multigene panel testing , 2017, Familial Cancer.

[5]  Olufunmilayo I. Olopade,et al.  Inheritance of deleterious mutations at both BRCA1 and BRCA2 in an international sample of 32,295 women , 2016, Breast Cancer Research.

[6]  R. Scott,et al.  Panel Testing for Familial Breast Cancer: Calibrating the Tension Between Research and Clinical Care. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Vijai Joseph,et al.  Conflicting Interpretation of Genetic Variants and Cancer Risk by Commercial Laboratories as Assessed by the Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  L. Happerfield,et al.  Multilocus Inherited Neoplasia Alleles Syndrome: A Case Series and Review. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[9]  H. Rehm,et al.  Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology , 2015, Genetics in Medicine.

[10]  M. Robson,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update: Genetic and Genomic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility. , 2010, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Karla Bowles,et al.  Frequency of mutations in individuals with breast cancer referred for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing using next‐generation sequencing with a 25‐gene panel , 2015, Cancer.

[12]  A. Duval,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome: suggestions of the European consortium ‘Care for CMMRD’ (C4CMMRD) , 2014, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[13]  Michael Krawczak,et al.  Where genotype is not predictive of phenotype: towards an understanding of the molecular basis of reduced penetrance in human inherited disease , 2013, Human Genetics.

[14]  A. W. van der Vaart,et al.  CHEK2*1100delC homozygosity is associated with a high breast cancer risk in women , 2011, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[15]  W. Foulkes,et al.  Inherited susceptibility to common cancers. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  W. Foulkes,et al.  BRCA1 and BRCA2: 1994 and beyond , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.