Roughly Collected Dataset for Contact Force Sensing Catheter

With rise of interventional cardiology, Catheter Ablation Therapy (CAT) has established itself as a firstline solution to treat cardiac arrhythmia. Although CAT is a promising technique, cardiologist lacks vision inside the body during the procedure, which may cause serious clinical syndromes. To support accurate clinical procedure, Contact Force Sensing (CFS) system is developed to find a position of the catheter tip through the measure of contact force between catheter and heart tissue. However, the practical usability of commercialized CFS systems is not fully understood due to inaccuracy in the measurement. To support the development of more accurate system, we develop a full pipeline of CFS system with newly collected benchmark dataset through a contact force sensing catheter in simplest hardware form. Our dataset was roughly collected with human noise to increase data diversity. Through the analysis of the dataset, we identify a problem defined as Shift of Reference (SoR), which prevents accurate measurement of contact force. To overcome the problem, we conduct the contact force estimation via standard deep neural networks including for Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Fully Convolutional Network (FCN) and Transformer. An average error in measurement for RNN, FCN and Transformer are, respectively, 2.46g, 3.03g and 3.01g. Through these studies, we try to lay a groundwork, serve a performance criteria for future CFS system research and open a publicly available dataset to public.

[1]  Frederick R. Forst,et al.  On robust estimation of the location parameter , 1980 .

[2]  S. Dottori,et al.  Which is the best catheter to perform atrial fibrillation ablation? A comparison between standard ThermoCool, SmartTouch, and Surround Flow catheters , 2014, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[3]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Catheter contact force estimation from shape detection using a real-time Cosserat rod model , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[4]  A. Natale,et al.  Fiberoptic Contact‐Force Sensing Electrophysiological Catheters: How Precise Is the Technology? , 2017, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[5]  Gerald Meltz,et al.  Fiber Optic Bragg Grating Sensors , 1990, Other Conferences.

[6]  A. Skanes,et al.  Cryoablation of atrial arrhythmias. , 2002, Cardiac electrophysiology review.

[7]  F. Bourier,et al.  Electromagnetic Contact‐Force Sensing Electrophysiological Catheters: How Accurate Is the Technology? , 2016, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[8]  Kawal Rhode,et al.  Three dimensional force estimation for steerable catheters through bi-point tracking , 2018, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical.

[9]  Lukasz Kaiser,et al.  Attention is All you Need , 2017, NIPS.

[10]  R. Kashyap Fiber Bragg Gratings , 1999 .

[11]  Prashanthan Sanders,et al.  Catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias: state of the art , 2012, The Lancet.

[12]  M. Dhinoja,et al.  SmartTouch™ - The Emerging Role of Contact Force Technology in Complex Catheter Ablation. , 2012, Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review.

[13]  H. Hachiya,et al.  Management of cardiac tamponade in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: single-centre 15 year experience on 5222 procedures , 2018, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[14]  Jessica Koehler,et al.  Advanced Digital Signal Processing And Noise Reduction , 2016 .

[15]  F. Morady Radio-frequency ablation as treatment for cardiac arrhythmias. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation , 2014, EMNLP.

[17]  Girish Keshav Palshikar Simple Algorithms for Peak Detection in Time-Series , 2009 .