Accurate estimate of turbulent dissipation rate using PIV data

Abstract Quantifying the turbulent dissipation rate provides insight into the physics of the turbulent flows. However, the accuracy of estimating turbulent dissipation rate using velocity data measured by planar PIV is affected by the way of modeling the unresolved velocity gradient terms and the PIV spatial resolution. In this paper, we first give a brief review of different methods used to estimate turbulent dissipation rate. Then synthetic PIV data are generated from a turbulence DNS dataset for validating the effectiveness of different methods. Direct estimate of turbulent dissipation rate from its definition using velocity gradients, with the assumption of isotropy, local axisymmetry, or local isotropy, shows significant decrease as interrogation window size increases. On the other hand, the indirect estimation of turbulent dissipation rate from energy spectra and structure function demonstrate less severe decrease as interrogation window size increases. We further propose two modified methods. The Modified Structure Function Method relies on an empirical relationship established by analyzing the synthetic PIV data. For a given measured value turbulent dissipation rate under a given interrogation window size, the true value can be determined from this relationship. The Modified Spectra Curvefit Method accounts the averaging effect introduced by the interrogation window in PIV processing algorithm and thus gives a better calculation of the energy spectra. When the new spectra data are used to curve fit the - 5 / 3 slope, an improved estimate of turbulent dissipation rate is expected. Both modified methods are applied to experimental PIV data acquired from a turbulent jet experiment. They give nearly converged estimates of turbulent dissipation rate and Kolmogorov scale at different interrogation window sizes.

[1]  Stephen G. Monismith,et al.  An Autonomous Open-Ocean Stereoscopic PIV Profiler , 2010 .

[2]  J. Lumley,et al.  A First Course in Turbulence , 1972 .

[3]  John K. Eaton,et al.  A correction method for measuring turbulence kinetic energy dissipation rate by PIV , 2007 .

[4]  John L. Lumley,et al.  Some comments on turbulence , 1992 .

[5]  R. Antonia,et al.  On the measurement of lateral velocity derivatives in turbulent flows , 1993 .

[6]  A. Kolmogorov Dissipation of energy in the locally isotropic turbulence , 1941, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[7]  S. H. Woodward,et al.  Dissipation rate estimation from PIV in zero-mean isotropic turbulence , 2009 .

[8]  William K. George,et al.  Locally axisymmetric turbulence , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  C. Meneveau,et al.  Scale interactions of turbulence subjected to a straining–relaxation–destraining cycle , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  Pentti Saarenrinne,et al.  Turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate estimation from PIV velocity vector fields , 2000 .

[11]  F. De Gregorio,et al.  Spatial resolution of PIV for the measurement of turbulence , 2007 .

[12]  Antonia,et al.  Effect of initial conditions on the mean energy dissipation rate and the scaling exponent , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[13]  Hui Meng,et al.  A large eddy PIV method for turbulence dissipation rate estimation , 2000 .

[14]  J. Hinze,et al.  Turbulence: An Introduction to Its Mechanism and Theory , 1959 .

[15]  Markus Raffel,et al.  Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practical Guide , 2002 .

[16]  P. Moin,et al.  DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION: A Tool in Turbulence Research , 1998 .

[17]  L. Vervisch,et al.  Estimation of the accuracy of PIV treatments for turbulent flow studies by direct numerical simulation of multi-phase flow , 2001 .

[18]  J. Katz,et al.  Turbulence Characteristics and Dissipation Estimates in the Coastal Ocean Bottom Boundary Layer from PIV Data , 2001 .

[19]  Steven T. Wereley,et al.  A correlation-based continuous window-shift technique to reduce the peak-locking effect in digital PIV image evaluation , 2002 .

[20]  R. Antonia,et al.  On the normalized turbulent energy dissipation rate , 2005 .

[21]  Yi Li,et al.  A public turbulence database cluster and applications to study Lagrangian evolution of velocity increments in turbulence , 2008, 0804.1703.

[22]  C. Trägårdh,et al.  Measurements and analysis of high-intensity turbulent characteristics in a turbine-agitated tank , 2000 .

[23]  Shelly L. Miller,et al.  Particle Image Velocimetry of Human Cough , 2011 .

[24]  Duo Xu,et al.  Experimental study of stratified jet by simultaneous measurements of velocity and density fields , 2012, Experiments in Fluids.

[25]  John Kim,et al.  Some characteristics of small-scale turbulence in a turbulent duct flow , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[26]  J. Westerweel,et al.  The effect of a discrete window offset on the accuracy of cross-correlation analysis of digital PIV recordings , 1997 .

[27]  K. Sreenivasan On the universality of the Kolmogorov constant , 1995 .

[28]  L. Lourenço Particle Image Velocimetry , 1989 .