Influence of herd environment on health and fertility and their relationship with milk production.

High levels of milk production in dairy cattle can have negative side effects on health and fertility traits. This paper explores the relationships among milk yield, health, and fertility traits both across and within herd environments on a national scale. A total of 456,574 lactations from 3904 herds recorded from 1995 to 1999 in The Netherlands were analyzed. Herd environment was defined by 41 variables derived from production records and the annual national agricultural survey. Principal components analysis reduced this set to 4 components: intensity, defined as average production per cow, average fertility, farm size, and relative performance indicating whether herds had good (poor) health and fertility despite a high (low) production. Both fertility and health were better for some traits in high-intensity herds and for other traits in low-intensity herds. In high-intensity herds, somatic cell count (SCC) levels were lower, drops in production occurred more often, and first service took place earlier but with lower success. High fertility occurred more often in herds located on sandy soils and in those that had lower SCC levels, had fewer drops in production and higher cow survival. On large farms, drops in production were less frequent and fertility was somewhat better. The within-herd analysis showed that the relationship of milk yield with health and fertility was stronger in herds with high production, fertility, or both. In herds with poor relative performance, there was no difference in production levels between animals with good health or fertility and those with poor health or fertility.

[1]  E. Noordhuizen-Stassen,et al.  Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review , 1998 .

[2]  J. Jensen,et al.  Genotype by Environment Interaction in Nordic Dairy Cattle Studied Using Reaction Norms , 2002 .

[3]  P R Tozer,et al.  Using activity and milk yield as predictors of fresh cow disorders. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  H. Barkema,et al.  Incidence of clinical mastitis in dairy herds grouped in three categories by bulk milk somatic cell counts. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  R F Veerkamp,et al.  The effect of pathogen-specific clinical mastitis on the lactation curve for somatic cell count. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  R. Dewhurst,et al.  On the relationship between lactational performance and health: is it yield or metabolic imbalance that cause production diseases in dairy cattle? A position paper , 2003 .

[7]  P. Garnsworthy,et al.  Fertility in the high-producing dairy cow ☆ , 2004 .

[8]  H. Barkema,et al.  Management practices associated with the incidence rate of clinical mastitis. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  H. Seegers,et al.  Calculated milk production losses associated with elevated somatic cell counts in dairy cows: review and critical discussion. , 1998, Veterinary research.

[10]  M. Calus,et al.  Genotype x environment interaction for protein yield in Dutch dairy cattle as quantified by different models. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  F. H. Dodd,et al.  Control of mastitis in the dairy herd by hygiene and management. , 1969, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  U. Emanuelson,et al.  Incidences and effects of diseases on the performance of Swedish dairy herds stratified by production. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  D. Boichard,et al.  Genetics of resistance to mastitis in dairy cattle. , 2003, Veterinary research.

[14]  M. Calus,et al.  Effects of data structure on the estimation of covariance functions to describe genotype by environment interactions in a reaction norm model , 2004, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[15]  M. Goddard,et al.  Genotype x environment interaction for milk production of daughters of Australian dairy sires from test-day records. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  P. Bartlett,et al.  Environmental and managerial risk factors of intramammary infection with coagulase-negative staphylococci in Ohio dairy herds , 1992 .

[17]  R. Blake,et al.  Genotype by environment interaction for yield and somatic cell score with alternative environmental definitions. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  H. Seegers,et al.  Effects of disease on milk production in the dairy cow: a review. , 1999, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[19]  G Benedictus,et al.  Management style and its association with bulk milk somatic cell count and incidence rate of clinical mastitis. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  H. Seegers,et al.  Incidence of health disorders in dairy farming systems in western France , 2001 .

[21]  M. Calus,et al.  Estimation of environmental sensitivity of genetic merit for milk production traits using a random regression model. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Genetic aspects of common health disorders and measures of fertility in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle , 1997 .

[23]  U. Emanuelson,et al.  Genetic and Environmental Correlations Among Female Fertility Traits and Milk Production in Different Parities of Swedish Red and White Dairy Cattle , 2001 .

[24]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Genotype and feeding system effects and interactions for health and fertility traits in dairy cattle , 1999 .

[25]  P Sandoe,et al.  Staying good while playing god--the ethics of breeding farm animals. , 1999, Animal welfare.

[26]  M. Calus,et al.  The association between somatic cell count patterns and milk production prior to mastitis , 2005 .

[27]  P A Oltenacu,et al.  Effect of herd environment on the genetic and phenotypic relationships among milk yield, conception rate, and somatic cell score in Holstein cattle. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.