Suturing training in Augmented Reality: gaining proficiency in suturing skills faster

BackgroundProviding informative feedback and setting goals tends to motivate trainees to practice more extensively. Augmented Reality simulators retain the benefit of realistic haptic feedback and additionally generate objective assessment and informative feedback during the training. This study researched the performance curve of the adapted suturing module on the ProMIS Augmented Reality simulator.MethodsEighteen novice participants were pretrained on the MIST-VR to become acquainted with laparoscopy. Subsequently, they practiced 16 knots on the suturing module, of which the assessment scores were recorded to evaluate the gain in laparoscopic suturing skills. The scoring of the assessment method was calculated from the “time spent in the correct area” during the knot tying and the quality of the knot. Both the baseline knot and the knot at the top of the performance curve were assessed by two independent objective observers, by means of a standardized evaluation form, to objectify the gain in suturing skills.ResultsThere was a statistically significant difference between the scores of the second knot (mean 72.59, standard deviation (SD) 16.28) and the top of the performance curve (mean 95.82, SD 3.05; p < 0.001, paired t-test). The scoring of the objective observers also differed significantly (mean 11.83 and 22.11, respectively; SD 3.37 and 3.89, respectively; p < 0.001) (interobserver reliability Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96). The median amount of repetitions to reach the top of the performance curve was eight, which also showed significant differences between both the assessment score (mean 88.14, SD 13.53, p < 0.001) and scoring of the objective observers of the second knot (mean 20.51, SD 4.14; p < 0.001).ConclusionsThis adapted suturing module on the ProMIS Augmented Reality laparoscopic simulator is a potent tool for gaining laparoscopic suturing skills.

[1]  C. D. Smith,et al.  Does Setting Specific Goals and Providing Feedback during Training Result in Better Acquisition of Laparoscopic Skills? , 2004, The American surgeon.

[2]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Spatial ability, experience, and skill in laparoscopic surgery. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[3]  R. Satava,et al.  Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded Study , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[4]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[5]  G. Fried,et al.  Proving the Value of Simulation in Laparoscopic Surgery , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[6]  D. Scott,et al.  Construct and face validity of MIST-VR, Endotower, and CELTS , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[7]  E. DeMaria,et al.  Training the novice in laparoscopy. More challenge is better. , 2002, Surgical endoscopy.

[8]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Laparoscopic skills training and assessment , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[9]  Rajesh Aggarwal,et al.  A competency-based virtual reality training curriculum for the acquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skill. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[10]  A. G. Gallagher,et al.  Attempted establishment of proficiency levels for laparoscopic performance on a national scale using simulation: the results from the 2004 SAGES Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer—Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) learning center study , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  P. Ström,et al.  Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[12]  A. G. Gallagher,et al.  Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[13]  J. J. Jakimowicz,et al.  Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[14]  J. Korndorffer,et al.  Limited feedback and video tutorials optimize learning and resource utilization during laparoscopic simulator training. , 2007, Surgery.

[15]  A Cuschieri,et al.  Objective assessment of endoscopic knot quality. , 1997, American journal of surgery.

[16]  D. R. Montello,et al.  Learning a Spatial Skill for Surgery : How the Contributions of Abilities Change With Practice , 2006 .

[17]  R. Reznick,et al.  Verbal feedback from an expert is more effective than self-accessed feedback about motion efficiency in learning new surgical skills. , 2007, American journal of surgery.

[18]  E. DeMaria,et al.  Training the novice in laparoscopy , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[19]  A. Ziv,et al.  Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review , 2005, Medical teacher.

[20]  M. Schijven,et al.  The learning curve on the Xitact LS 500 laparoscopy simulator: profiles of performance , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.