Classification-based summation of cerebral digital subtraction angiography series for image post-processing algorithms.

X-ray-based 2D digital subtraction angiography (DSA) plays a major role in the diagnosis, treatment planning and assessment of cerebrovascular disease, i.e. aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations and intracranial stenosis. DSA information is increasingly used for secondary image post-processing such as vessel segmentation, registration and comparison to hemodynamic calculation using computational fluid dynamics. Depending on the amount of injected contrast agent and the duration of injection, these DSA series may not exhibit one single DSA image showing the entire vessel tree. The interesting information for these algorithms, however, is usually depicted within a few images. If these images would be combined into one image the complexity of segmentation or registration methods using DSA series would drastically decrease. In this paper, we propose a novel method automatically splitting a DSA series into three parts, i.e. mask, arterial and parenchymal phase, to provide one final image showing all important vessels with less noise and moving artifacts. This final image covers all arterial phase images, either by image summation or by taking the minimum intensities. The phase classification is done by a two-step approach. The mask/arterial phase border is determined by a Perceptron-based method trained from a set of DSA series. The arterial/parenchymal phase border is specified by a threshold-based method. The evaluation of the proposed method is two-sided: (1) comparison between automatic and medical expert-based phase selection and (2) the quality of the final image is measured by gradient magnitudes inside the vessels and signal-to-noise (SNR) outside. Experimental results show a match between expert and automatic phase separation of 93%/50% and an average SNR increase of up to 182% compared to summing up the entire series.

[1]  Zhenyu Wu,et al.  Real-time tracking of contrast bolus propagation in X-ray peripheral angiography , 1998, Proceedings. Workshop on Biomedical Image Analysis (Cat. No.98EX162).

[2]  Jong Beom Ra,et al.  Three-Dimensional Blood Vessel Quantification via Centerline Deformation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[4]  Hengyong Yu,et al.  Projection-based Bolus Detection for Computed Tomographic Angiography , 2006, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  William R. Brody,et al.  Digital Subtraction Angiography , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[6]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Guide Wire Tracking During Endovascular Interventions , 2000, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention.

[7]  Tianxu Zhang,et al.  Knowledge-based adaptive thresholding segmentation of digital subtraction angiography images , 2007, Image Vis. Comput..

[8]  Giuseppe Placidi,et al.  A shape-based segmentation algorithm for X-ray digital subtraction angiography images , 2009, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[9]  R F Mattern,et al.  Digital subtraction angiography. , 1983, The Journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey.

[10]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Muliscale Vessel Enhancement Filtering , 1998, MICCAI.

[11]  Dietrich Paulus,et al.  Vessel Enhancement in 2D Angiographic Images , 2007, FIMH.

[12]  Giuseppe Placidi,et al.  A Novel Segmentation Algorithm for Digital Subtraction Angiography Images: First Experimental Results , 2008, ISVC.

[13]  L H Cheong,et al.  An automatic approach for estimating bolus arrival time in dynamic contrast MRI using piecewise continuous regression models. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Image Registration for Digital Subtraction Angiography , 1999, International Journal of Computer Vision.