Game Impact Theory : The Five Forces That Are Driving the Adoption of Game Technologies within Multiple Established Industries

The computer gaming industry has begun to export powerful products and technologies from its initial entertainment roots to a number of “serious” industries. Games are being adopted for defense, medicine, architecture, education, city planning, and government applications. Each of these industries is already served by an established family of companies that typically do not use games or the technologies that support them. The rapid growth in the power of game technologies and the growing social acceptance of these technologies has created an environment in which these are displacing other industry-specific computer hardware and software suites. This paper puts forward a game impact theory that identifies five specific forces that compel industries to adopt game technologies for their core products and services. These five forces are computer hardware costs, game software power, social acceptance, other industry successes, and native industry experimentation. Together these influence the degree and rapidity at which game technologies are adopted in a number of industries. This theory is meant to be useful to managers who must make decisions about adopting, investigating, or ignoring these new technologies.

[1]  Paul R. Thompson.  AUTHOR! , 1982, The Lancet.

[2]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The innovator's challenge : understanding the influence of market environment on processes of technology development in the rigid disk drive industry , 1992 .

[3]  C R Morris,et al.  How architecture wins technology wars. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[4]  David C. Lane,et al.  On a Resurgence of Management Simulations and Games , 1995 .

[5]  D. C. Miller,et al.  SIMNET: the advent of simulator networking , 1995, Proc. IEEE.

[6]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  Adult and Teenage Use of Consumer, Business, and Entertainment Technology: Potholes on the Information Superhighway? , 1995 .

[7]  J. Casti.  Would-Be Worlds: How Simulation Is Changing the Frontiers of Science , 1996 .

[8]  Nolan Bushnell.  Relationships between fun and the computer business , 1996, CACM.

[9]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[10]  Robert Kevin Grigsby.  "Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation" , 1996 .

[11]  Telecommunications Board,et al.  Modeling and Simulation: Linking Entertainment and Defense , 1997 .

[12]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[13]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  Co‐opetition: Competitive and cooperative business strategies for the digital economy , 1997 .

[14]  W. Kim,et al.  Creating new market space. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[15]  Michael Schrage,et al.  Serious Play: How the World's Best Companies Simulate to Innovate , 1999 .

[16]  W. Kim,et al.  Knowing a winning business idea when you see one. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[17]  Frank H. Maier,et al.  What are we talking about?—A taxonomy of computer simulations to support learning , 2000 .

[18]  N. Nie,et al.  Internet and society: a preliminary report , 2001 .

[19]  E. Hippel.  Innovation by User Communities: Learning From Open-Source Software , 2001 .

[20]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Innovation : driving product, process, and market change , 2002 .

[21]  Venkatesh Shankar,et al.  Network Effects and Competition: An Empirical Analysis of the Home Video Game Industry , 2002 .

[22]  T. Kaukoranta,et al.  A Review on Networking and Multiplayer Computer Games , 2002 .

[23]  Michael Macedonia,et al.  Computer Games and the Military: Two Views , 2002 .

[24]  Philip E. Orbanes,et al.  The Game Makers: The Story of Parker Brothers, from Tiddledy Winks to Trivial Pursuit , 2003 .

[25]  Michael E. Raynor,et al.  The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth , 2003 .

[26]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[27]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation , 2003 .

[28]  Ted G. Lewis,et al.  This year in the MOVES institute , 2003, Proceedings. 2003 International Conference on Cyberworlds.

[29]  Y. Aoyama,et al.  Hardware gimmick or cultural innovation? Technological, cultural, and social foundations of the Japanese video game industry , 2003 .

[30]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Technological Leapfrogging: Lessons from the U.S. Video Game Console Industry , 2003 .

[31]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  How Breakthroughs Happen: The Surprising Truth About How Companies Innovate , 2003 .

[32]  Chi-Hyon Lee,et al.  Preferential Linkage and Network Evolution: A Conceptual Model and Empirical Test in the U.S. Video Game Sector , 2004 .

[33]  Walt Scacchi,et al.  Free and open source development practices in the game community , 2004, IEEE Software.

[34]  David R. Michael,et al.  Serious Games: Games That Educate, Train, and Inform , 2005 .

[35]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[36]  Bryan P. Bergeron,et al.  Developing serious games , 2006 .

[37]  Roger D. Smith,et al.  The Disruptive Potential of Game Technologies , 2007 .