SOCRatES: A Database of Realistic Data for SOurce Camera REcognition on Smartphones

SOCRatES: SOurce Camera REcognition on Smartphones, is an image and video database especially designed for source digital camera recognition on smartphones. It answers to two specific needs, the need of wider pools of data for the developing and benchmarking of image forensic techniques, and the need to move the application of these techniques on smartphones, since, nowadays, they are the most employed devices for image capturing and video recording. What makes SOCRatES different from all previous published databases is that it is collected by the smartphone owners themselves, introducing a great heterogeneity and realness in the data. SOCRatES is currently made up of about 9.700 images and 1000 videos captured with 103 different smartphones of 15 different makes and about 60 different models. With 103 different devices, SOCRatES is the database for source digital camera identification that includes the highest number of different sensors. In this paper we describe SOCRatES and we present a baseline assessment based on the Sensor Pattern Noise

[1]  Zeno Geradts,et al.  Methods for identification of images acquired with digital cameras , 2001, SPIE Optics East.

[2]  Yong Yu,et al.  Exploring New Authentication Protocols for Sensitive Data Protection on Smartphones , 2018, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  Mohan S. Kankanhalli,et al.  Identifying Source Cell Phone using Chromatic Aberration , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[4]  Xufeng Lin,et al.  Enhancing Sensor Pattern Noise via Filtering Distortion Removal , 2016, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[5]  Min Wu,et al.  Exploring compression effects for improved source camera identification using strongly compressed video , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[6]  Michele Nappi,et al.  Multimodal authentication on smartphones: Combining iris and sensor recognition for a double check of user identity , 2016, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[7]  Luisa Verdoliva,et al.  A study of co-occurrence based local features for camera model identification , 2016, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[8]  Chang-Tsun Li,et al.  Source Camera Identification Using Enhanced Sensor Pattern Noise , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[9]  Marco Fontani,et al.  VISION: a video and image dataset for source identification , 2017, EURASIP Journal on Information Security.

[10]  Judith Redi,et al.  Digital image forensics: a booklet for beginners , 2010, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[11]  Luisa Verdoliva,et al.  On the vulnerability of deep learning to adversarial attacks for camera model identification , 2018, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[12]  Matthias Kirchner,et al.  Unexpected artefacts in PRNU-based camera identification: a 'Dresden Image Database' case-study , 2012, MM&Sec '12.

[13]  Rainer Böhme,et al.  The 'Dresden Image Database' for benchmarking digital image forensics , 2010, SAC '10.

[14]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Blind Identification of Source Cell-Phone Model , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[15]  Giovanni Maria Farinella,et al.  On Blind Source Camera Identification , 2015, ACIVS.

[16]  Mohan S. Kankanhalli,et al.  A Survey on Digital Camera Image Forensic Methods , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[17]  Edmund Y. Lam,et al.  Source camera identification using footprints from lens aberration , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[18]  Jingyuan Zhang,et al.  Source camera identification using Auto-White Balance approximation , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[19]  Miroslav Goljan,et al.  Digital camera identification from sensor pattern noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.