Origins and consequences of technology acquirement by independent-living seniors: towards an integrative model

BackgroundLiving independently can be challenging for seniors. Technologies are expected to help older adults age in place, yet little empirical research is available on how seniors develop a need for technologies, how they acquire these technologies, and how these subsequently affect their lives. Aging is complex, dynamic and personal. But how does this translate to seniors’ adoption and acceptance of technology? To better understand origins and consequences of technology acquirement by independent-living seniors, an explorative longitudinal qualitative field study was set up.MethodsHome visits were made to 33 community-dwelling seniors living in the Netherlands, on three occasions (2012–2014). Semi-structured interviews were conducted on the timeline of acquirements, and people and factors involved in acquirements. Additionally, participants were interviewed on experiences in using technologies since acquirement. Thematic analysis was employed to analyze interview transcripts, using a realist approach to better understand the contexts, mechanisms and outcomes of technology acquirements.ResultsFindings were accumulated in a new conceptual model: The Cycle of Technology Acquirement by Independent-Living Seniors (C-TAILS), which provides an integrative perspective on why and how technologies are acquired, and why these may or may not prove to be appropriate and effective, considering an independent-living senior’s needs and circumstances at a given point in time. We found that externally driven and purely desire-driven acquirements led to a higher risk of suboptimal use and low levels of need satisfaction.ConclusionsTechnology acquirement by independent-living seniors may be best characterized as a heterogeneous process with many different origins, pathways and consequences. Furthermore, technologies that are acquired in ways that are not congruent with seniors’ personal needs and circumstances run a higher risk of proving to be ineffective or inappropriate. Yet, these needs and circumstances are subject to change, and the C-TAILS model can be employed to better understand contexts and mechanisms that come into play.

[1]  G. Moschis Consumer Behavior in Later Life: Current Knowledge, Issues, and New Directions for Research , 2012 .

[2]  Noshad Rahimi,et al.  Explaining health technology adoption: Past, present, future , 2015, 2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET).

[3]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Market Segmentation Research: Beyond Within and Across Group Differences , 2002 .

[4]  Daniel Lopez Gomez Little arrangements that matter. Rethinking autonomy-enabling innovations for later life , 2015 .

[5]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Dead Or Alive? The Development, Trajectory And Future Of Technology Adoption Research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[7]  Mira Ahn,et al.  Understanding Older Adults' Attitudes and Adoption of Residential Technologies , 2008 .

[8]  Michelle Hough,et al.  Increasing elder consumer interactions with information technology , 2009 .

[9]  Melissa S. Burnett,et al.  Marketing Product Innovations to the Elderly: Understanding the Barriers to Adoption , 1992 .

[10]  D. D. de Ridder,et al.  A review of successful aging models: proposing proactive coping as an important additional strategy. , 2007, Clinical psychology review.

[11]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[12]  J. Maxwell Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[13]  Catherine A. Cole,et al.  An integration of perspectives on aging and consumer decision making , 2009 .

[14]  Joost van Hoof,et al.  Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review , 2014, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[15]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[16]  Catherine A. Cole,et al.  Consumer decision making and aging: Current knowledge and future directions , 2009 .

[17]  C. Yoon,et al.  Chapter 17 – Aging and Consumer Decision Making , 2015 .

[18]  G. Moschis Stress and consumer behavior , 1999 .

[19]  J Sixsmith,et al.  Healthy ageing and home: the perspectives of very old people in five European countries. , 2014, Social science & medicine.

[20]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[21]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Trends in Seniors' Use of Digital Health Technology in the United States, 2011-2014. , 2016, JAMA.

[22]  S. Czaja,et al.  Advancing the Aging and Technology Agenda in Gerontology. , 2015, The Gerontologist.

[23]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[24]  Marita A. O'Brien,et al.  Diffusion of Technology: Frequency of use for Younger and Older Adults , 2011, Ageing international.

[25]  Karen Renaud,et al.  Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: a qualitative study , 2008, SAICSIT '08.

[26]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[27]  E. Agree,et al.  The potential for technology to enhance independence for those aging with a disability. , 2014, Disability and health journal.

[28]  Ashesh Mukherjee,et al.  The Effect of Novel Attributes on Product Evaluation : Explaining Consumer Resistance to Technological Innovation , 2001 .

[29]  Sven Carlsson The Potential of Critical Realism in IS Research , 2012 .

[30]  M. Gilly,et al.  Consumer Identity Renaissance: The Resurgence of Identity-Inspired Consumption in Retirement , 2009 .

[31]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  The silver market phenomenon : marketing and innovation in the aging society , 2011 .

[32]  Janet Hoek,et al.  Market Segmentation , 1993 .

[33]  James R. Lumpkin,et al.  An Applied Investigation Of Rogers And Shoemakers Perceived Innovation Attribute Typology When Marketing To Elderly Consumers , 2011 .

[34]  Eleni Stroulia,et al.  International Journal of Medical Informatics , 2016 .

[35]  Shumaila Y. Yousafzai,et al.  Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 2 , 2007 .

[36]  Yoram Wind,et al.  Issues and Advances in Segmentation Research , 1978 .

[37]  George Demiris,et al.  Framing the evidence for health smart homes and home-based consumer health technologies as a public health intervention for independent aging: A systematic review , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[38]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Katrien G Luijkx,et al.  The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: psychometric properties. , 2010, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[40]  Sil Aarts,et al.  Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place , 2015, Gerontology.

[41]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  eHealth research from the user's perspective. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[42]  Sil Aarts,et al.  Can smart home technology deliver on the promise of independent living?: A critical reflection based on the perspectives of older adults , 2009 .

[43]  Maria Berge,et al.  Telecare acceptance as sticky entrapment: A realist review , 2016 .

[44]  Peter R. Dickson Person-Situation: Segmentation's Missing Link , 1982 .

[45]  Philip Fei Wu,et al.  A Mixed Methods Approach to Technology Acceptance Research , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[46]  D. Dannefer,et al.  Aged heterogeneity: fact or fiction? The fate of diversity in gerontological research. , 1992, The Gerontologist.

[47]  P. Baltes,et al.  Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. , 1990 .

[48]  Sheila M. Fram The Constant Comparative Analysis Method Outside of Grounded Theory , 2013 .

[49]  R. Atchley A continuity theory of normal aging. , 1989, The Gerontologist.

[50]  Yang Yang,et al.  Dynamics and heterogeneity in the process of human frailty and aging: evidence from the U.S. older adult population. , 2010, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[51]  A. Dey World report on ageing and health , 2017, The Indian Journal of Medical Research.

[52]  Heshan Sun,et al.  A methodological analysis of user technology acceptance , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[53]  C. Yoon,et al.  Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Aging and Consumer Decision Making , 2022 .

[54]  Ke Chen,et al.  Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM) , 2014, Ergonomics.

[55]  Ke Chen,et al.  Use or Non-Use of Gerontechnology—A Qualitative Study , 2013, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[56]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[57]  R. Mostaghel,et al.  Innovation and technology for the elderly: Systematic literature review , 2016 .

[58]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Older Adults' Acceptance of Information Technology , 2011 .

[59]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place , 2014, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[60]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Use of serial qualitative interviews to understand patients’ evolving experiences and needs , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[61]  Elmar Brähler,et al.  Prediction of institutionalization in the elderly. A systematic review. , 2010, Age and ageing.

[62]  Tiago H. Falk,et al.  Approaches to Understanding the Impact of Technologies for Aging in Place: A Mini-Review , 2014, Gerontology.

[63]  Why Do Older Consumers Tell Us They Are More Satisfied ? , 2010 .

[64]  Margaret C. Campbell,et al.  Goal Seeker and Persuasion Sentry: How Consumer Targets Respond to Interpersonal Marketing Persuasion , 2004 .

[65]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  The year 2000: Looking forward , 2000 .

[66]  M. Mather,et al.  Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[67]  T. Murphy,et al.  Dynamics of functional aging based on latent-class trajectories of activities of daily living. , 2013, Annals of epidemiology.

[68]  George P. Moschis,et al.  Marketing to older adults: an updated overview of present knowledge and practice , 2003 .

[69]  J. Davey,et al.  Accommodation Options for Older People in Aotearoa/New Zealand , 2004 .

[70]  J. Coughlin,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: Older Adults' Adoption of Technology: An Integrated Approach to Identifying Determinants and Barriers , 2015 .

[71]  Joanne Greenhalgh,et al.  What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation , 2015, Implementation Science.

[72]  Catherine A. Cole,et al.  Age differences in consumers' search for information: Public policy implications. , 1993 .

[73]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[74]  Joseph C. Hermanowicz Longitudinal Qualitative Research , 2016 .

[75]  Julie Doyle,et al.  Lessons learned in deploying independent living technologies to older adults’ homes , 2013, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[76]  Eveline Wouters,et al.  “Grandma, You Should Do It—It’s Cool” Older Adults and the Role of Family Members in Their Acceptance of Technology , 2015, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[77]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Consumer Behavior , 2024 .

[78]  Susan Spiggle Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research , 1994 .

[79]  Hennie Boeije,et al.  Analysis in qualitative research , 2010 .

[80]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Quo vadis TAM? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[81]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[82]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..