Restoration and Rehabilitation of Species‐Rich Grassland Ecosystems in France: a Review

In France the alteration of species-rich grasslands is due mainly to agriculture and civil engineering projects (roadways, dams, ski resorts, etc.). The restoration of such ecosystems has been tested in many regions and after many sorts of degradation. According to the level of initial degradation, different responses can be envisioned. Some variations are presented of a general model of restoration and rehabilitation: (1) rejuvenation of fallow land by grazing with rustic animal breeds in wetlands or chalk grasslands in south and northwestern France, (2) restoration by recovery of extensive agricultural management in intensive agricultural areas such as the Rhone or Meuse Valleys, and (3) rehabilitation by appropriate ecological engineering carried out in grasslands degraded by intensification, ski-track, or civil engineering installations. Despite some positive results, these undertakings have not always had the expected effects and therefore should not provide alibis for the destruction of natural grasslands. In general, the success of such undertakings depends on the maintenance in the surrounding areas of protected seed source reservoirs and on the persistence of a diversified landscape pattern permitting connectivity between these seed sources and the restoration or rehabilitation sites.

[1]  J. Bakker,et al.  Nature Management by Grazing and Cutting , 1989, Geobotany.

[2]  P. A. Bassett.  Some effects of grazing on vegetation dynamics in the Camargue, France , 1980, Vegetatio.

[3]  D. Maas,et al.  Samenpotential in Niedermoorböden des Alpenvorlandes bei Grünlandnutzung unterschiedlicher Intensität , 1987 .

[4]  R. Marrs,et al.  Techniques for reducing soil fertility for nature conservation purposes: A review in relation to research at Roper's Heath, Suffolk, England , 1985 .

[5]  B. Green.  Agricultural intensification and the loss of habitat, species and amenity in British grasslands: a review of historical change and assessment of future prospects† , 1990 .

[6]  M. Hutchings,et al.  Estimation of the seed bank of a chalk grassland ley established on former arable land , 1988 .

[7]  T. Lecomte,et al.  Le marais Vernier : contribution à l'étude et à la gestion d'une zone humide , 1986 .

[8]  D. Alard,et al.  Grassland Vegetation as an Indicator of the Main Agro-Ecological Factors in a Rural Landscape: Consequences for Biodiversity and Wildlife Conservation in Central Normandy (France) , 1994 .

[9]  J. Broyer,et al.  Incidence de la fertilisation sur la diversité floristique des prairies de fauche inondables dans le Val de Saône , 1995 .

[10]  A. García.  Conserving the species-rich meadows of Europe , 1992 .

[11]  Christian Floret,et al.  Restoration and Rehabilitation of Degraded Ecosystems in Arid and Semi‐Arid Lands. I. A View from the South , 1993 .

[12]  J. Willems.  Species composition and above ground phytomass in chalk grassland with different management , 1983, Vegetatio.

[13]  K. Urbanska.  Biodiversity assessment in ecological restoration above the timberline , 1995, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[14]  A. Bradshaw.  The biology of land restoration , 1992 .

[15]  F. Berendse,et al.  Experiments on the restoration of species-rich meadows in The Netherlands , 1992 .

[16]  T. Wells.  Botanical aspects of conservation management of chalk grasslands , 1969 .

[17]  M. Oomes.  Changes in dry matter and nutrient yields during the restoration of species‐rich grasslands , 1990 .