Abstract The discrepancy in the past years of many more black-hole soft X-ray transients (SXTs), of which a dozen have now been identified, had challenged accepted wisdom in black hole evolution. Reconstruction in the literature of high-mass X-ray binaries has required stars of up to ∼40 M ⊙ to evolve into low-mass compact objects, setting this mass as the limit often used for black hole formation in population syntheses. On the other hand, the sheer number of inferred SXTs requires that many, if not most, stars of ZAMS masses 20–35 M ⊙ end up as black holes ( Portegies Zwart et al., 1997 , Ergma and van den Heuvel, 1998 ). In this paper we show that this can be understood by challenging the accepted wisdom that the result of helium core burning in a massive star is independent of whether the core is covered by a hydrogen envelope, or ‘naked’ while it burns. The latter case occurs in binaries when the envelope of the more massive star is transferred to the companion by Roche Lobe overflow while in either main sequence or red giant stage. For solar metallicity, whereas the helium cores which burn while naked essentially never go into high-mass black holes, those that burn while clothed do so, beginning at ZAMS mass ∼20 M ⊙ , the precise mass depending on the 12C(α,γ)16O rate as we outline. In this way the SXTs can be evolved, provided that the H envelope of the massive star is removed only following the He core burning. Whereas this scenario was already outlined in 1998 by Brown et al. [NewA 4 (1999) 313], their work was based on evolutionary calculations of Woosley et al. [ApJ 448 (1995) 315] which employed wind loss rates which were too high. In this article we collect results for lower, more correct wind loss rates, finding that these change the results only little. We go into the details of carbon burning in order to reconstruct why the low Fe core masses from naked He stars are relatively insensitive to wind loss rate. The main reason is that without the helium produced by burning the hydrogen envelope, which is convected to the carbon in a clothed star, a central 12C abundance of ∼1/3 remains unburned in a naked star following He core burning. The later convective burning through 12C+12C reactions occurs at a temperature T∼80 keV. Finally, we show that in order to evolve a black hole of mass ≳10 M ⊙ such as observed in Cyg X-1 , even employing extremely massive progenitors of ZAMS mass ≳60 M ⊙ for the black hole, the core must be covered by hydrogen during a substantial fraction of the core burning. In other words, the progenitor must be a WNL star. We evolve Cyg X-1 in an analogous way to which the SXTs are evolved, the difference being that the companion in Cyg X-1 is more massive than those in the SXTs, so that Cyg X-1 shines continuously.
[1]
H. Bethe,et al.
A Scenario for a Large Number of Low-Mass Black Holes in the Galaxy
,
1994
.
[2]
John I. Castor,et al.
Radiation-driven winds in Of stars.
,
1975
.
[3]
H. Bethe,et al.
Contribution of High-Mass Black Holes to Mergers of Compact Binaries
,
1998,
astro-ph/9805355.
[4]
Neutron Star Mass Measurements. I. Radio Pulsars
,
1998,
astro-ph/9803260.
[5]
The Neutron star and black hole initial mass function
,
1995,
astro-ph/9510136.
[6]
N. Langer,et al.
Presupernova Evolution of Rotating Massive Stars. I. Numerical Method and Evolution of the Internal Stellar Structure
,
1999,
astro-ph/9904132.
[7]
Henny J. G. L. M. Lamers,et al.
Thermal and Ionization Aspects of Flows from Hot Stars
,
2000
.
[8]
A. Moffat,et al.
THE WOLF-RAYET BINARY V444 CYGNI UNDER THE SPECTROSCOPIC MICROSCOPE. I: IMPROVED CHARACTERISTICS OF THE COMPONENTS AND THEIR INTERACTION SEEN IN HE I
,
1994
.
[9]
S. Woosley,et al.
The evolution of massive stars including mass loss - Presupernova models and explosion
,
1993
.
[10]
V. Piirola,et al.
Polarization eclipse model of the Wolf-Rayet binary V444 Cygni with constraints on the stellar radii and an estimate of the Wolf-Rayet mass-loss rate
,
1993
.
[11]
W. Fowler,et al.
Stellar weak interaction rates for intermediate-mass nuclei. IV - Interpolation procedures for rapidly varying lepton capture rates using effective log (ft)-values
,
1985
.
[12]
H. Bethe,et al.
Equation of state in the gravitational collapse of stars
,
1979
.
[13]
K. Langanke,et al.
Shell-model calculations of stellar weak interaction rates: II. Weak rates for nuclei in the mass range in supernovae environments
,
2000,
nucl-th/0001018.
[14]
S. Woosley,et al.
Presupernova evolution of massive stars.
,
1978
.
[15]
S. Woosley,et al.
The Presupernova Evolution and Explosion of Helium Stars That Experience Mass Loss
,
1995
.
[16]
Mass Limits For Black Hole Formation
,
1999,
astro-ph/9902315.
[17]
J. Weingartner,et al.
On the formation of low-mass black holes in massive binary stars
,
1995,
astro-ph/9505092.
[18]
C. Robert,et al.
Clumping and Mass Loss in Hot Star Winds
,
1994
.
[19]
R. E. Casten,et al.
Nuclear Physics
,
1935,
Nature.
[20]
De Bruyn,et al.
Wolf-Rayet phenomena in massive stars and starburst galaxies
,
1999
.