The "utility" of the Time Trade-Off method in cancer patients: feasibility and proportional Trade-Off.

We examined the feasibility and the proportional trade-off assumption of the Time Trade-Off method. Utilities were assessed of the actual health states of 54 testicular and 72 colorectal cancer patients, treated with the curative intent and 29 incurable colorectal cancer patients. Three periods of time were used to assess proportionality: the subject's life expectancy and two shorter periods. Results showed the method to be feasible in curatively treated patients, though the use of life expectancy posed difficulties in some very old subjects. This same difficulty was encountered in patients with symptomatic incurable disease. A two step procedure is proposed as a solution. The proportional trade-off assumption was violated. Utilities for the longer period were smaller than those for the shorter periods. Life expectancy and trade-off did not correlate, though. Remarkable was that many patients were unwilling to trade at all. The implications of the findings are discussed.

[1]  J. Richardson,et al.  A cost utility analysis of mammography screening in Australia. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[2]  G. Loomes,et al.  The use of QALYs in health care decision making. , 1989, Social science & medicine.

[3]  G W Torrance,et al.  Measuring the wellbeing of family caregivers using the time trade-off technique. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  A. Mehrez,et al.  Quality-adjusted Life Years, Utility Theory, and Healthy-years Equivalents , 1989, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[5]  A Gafni,et al.  Healthy-years Equivalents versus Quality-adjusted Life Years , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[6]  J. de Haes,et al.  Utility Assessment in Cancer Patients , 1994, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[7]  L. Stalpers.  Clinical decision making in oncology: with special reference to patients with cancer of the head and neck , 1991 .

[8]  R. Klein,et al.  The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes study , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[9]  N. Boyd,et al.  Whose Utilities for Decision Analysis? , 1990, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[10]  J Lipscomb,et al.  Time Preference for Health in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , 1989, Medical care.

[11]  G W Torrance,et al.  A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. , 1972, Health services research.

[12]  G. Torrance,et al.  The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public. , 1978, Journal of chronic diseases.

[13]  B. McNeil,et al.  Speech and survival: tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life in laryngeal cancer. , 1981, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  N. Boyd,et al.  Attitudes Toward Quality of Survival , 1982, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[15]  George W. Torrance,et al.  Social preferences for health states: An empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques , 1976 .

[16]  M. Drummond,et al.  Resource allocation decisions in health care: a role for quality of life assessments? , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[17]  M. Johannesson,et al.  Are Healthy-years Equivalents an Improvement over Quality-adjusted Life Years? , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[18]  G. Torrance,et al.  Measurement of quality of life in end-stage renal disease: the time trade-off approach. , 1987, Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale.

[19]  R. Hamm,et al.  The Clinical Utility of Utility Assessment , 1982, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.