The time course of competition for attention: attention is initially labile.

Competition for attention between 2 written words was investigated by presenting the words briefly in a single stream of distractors (Experiment 1) or in different streams (Experiment 2-6), using rapid serial visual presentation at 53 ms/item. Stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) was varied from 0 to 213 ms. At all SOAs there was strong competition, but which word was more likely to be reported shifted markedly with SOA. At SOAs in the range of 13-53 ms the second word was more likely to be reported, but at 213 ms, the advantage switched to the first word, as in the attentional blink. A 2-stage competition model of attention is proposed in which attention to a detected target is labile in Stage 1. Stage 1 ends when one target is identified, initiating a serial Stage 2 process of consolidation of that target.

[1]  HighWire Press.  Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[2]  C. L. M..  The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.

[3]  D. Kahneman.  Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  V Di Lollo,et al.  Backward masking and interference with the processing of brief visual displays. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  M. Potter.  Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[6]  Philip M. Merikle,et al.  On the nature of metacontrast with complex targets and masks. , 1977 .

[7]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  J. Duncan.  The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[9]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[10]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[11]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The cost of visual filtering. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  D. LaBerge.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  William A. Phillips,et al.  Short-Term Visual Memory , 1983 .

[14]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[15]  G. Loftus,et al.  Perceptual and conceptual masking of pictures. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  H. Intraub.  Conceptual masking: the effects of subsequent visual events on memory for pictures. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  R. Burchfield.  Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[18]  Arnulf Remole,et al.  VISUAL MASKING: AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH , 1985 .

[19]  G. Sperling,et al.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. , 1987, Science.

[20]  D. Broadbent,et al.  From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  R. Klein,et al.  Conceptual masking in brief visual displays. , 1988, Canadian journal of psychology.

[22]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[23]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[24]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  M. Potter.  Very short-term conceptual memory , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[27]  S. Yantis.  Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture , 1993 .

[28]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision , 1994, Nature.

[29]  K. Shapiro,et al.  Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Steven M. J. Hunt,et al.  MacProbe: A Macintosh-based experimenter’s workstation for the cognitive sciences , 1994 .

[31]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Similarity determines the attentional blink. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  E. Vogel,et al.  Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink , 1996, Nature.

[34]  J. Driver,et al.  Priming from the Attentional Blink: A Failure to Extract Visual Tokens but Not Visual Types , 1997 .

[35]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Attentional requirements in a ‘preattentive’ feature search task , 1997, Nature.

[36]  W. Maki,et al.  Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: does word meaning survive the attentional blink? , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Substitution: A New Form of Masking in Unattended Visual Locations , 1997 .

[38]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[39]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[40]  M. Barriopedro,et al.  New evidence for the zoom lens model using the RSVP technique , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  M C Potter,et al.  Two attentional deficits in serial target search: the visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  R. Dell’Acqua,et al.  The Demonstration of Short-Term Consolidation , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  A Ehrenstein,et al.  The roles of location specificity and masking mechanisms in the attentional blink , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  Walter F. Bischof,et al.  Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains : Evidence from the attentional blink , 1999 .

[45]  V. Lollo,et al.  The attentional blink with targets in different spatial locations , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[46]  S. Yantis,et al.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  J. Juola,et al.  Priming effects in attentional gating , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[48]  S. Shih.  Recall of two visual targets embedded in RSVP streams of distractors depends on their temporal and spatial relationship , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  J. Enns,et al.  What’s new in visual masking? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  R. Klein,et al.  The Attentional Blink is Immune to Masking-Induced Data Limits , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[51]  Mary C. Potter,et al.  The attentional blink and task switching within and across modalities , 2001 .

[52]  K. Shapiro.  The limits of attention : temporal constraints in human information processing , 2001 .