CHEBYSHEV METHODS WITH DISCRETE NOISE : THE τ-ROCK METHODS

Stabilized or Chebyshev explicit methods have been widely used in the past to solve stiff ordinary differential equations. Making use of special properties of Chebyshev-like polynomials, these methods have favorable stability properties compared to standard explicit methods while remaining explicit. A new class of such methods, called ROCK, introduced in [Numer. Math., 90, 1-18, 2001] has recently been extended to stiff stochastic differential equations under the name S-ROCK [C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 345(10), 2007 and Commun. Math. Sci, 6(4), 2008]. In this paper we discuss the extension of the S-ROCK methods to systems with discrete noise and propose a new class of methods for such problems, the τ -ROCK methods. One motivation for such methods is the simulation of multi-scale or stiff chemical kinetic systems and such systems are the focus of this paper, but our new methods could potentially be interesting for other stiff systems with discrete noise. Two versions of the τ -ROCK methods are discussed and their stability behavior is analyzed on a test problem. Compared to the τ -leaping method, a significant speed-up can be achieved for some stiff kinetic systems. The behavior of the proposed methods are tested on several numerical experiments. Mathematics subject classification: 60G55; 65C30; 80A30

[1]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[2]  P. Houwen,et al.  On the Internal Stability of Explicit, m‐Stage Runge‐Kutta Methods for Large m‐Values , 1979 .

[3]  W. Ebeling Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1995 .

[4]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells. , 1998, Genetics.

[5]  Assyr Abdulle,et al.  Second order Chebyshev methods based on orthogonal polynomials , 2001, Numerische Mathematik.

[6]  D. Gillespie Approximate accelerated stochastic simulation of chemically reacting systems , 2001 .

[7]  S. SIAMJ.,et al.  FOURTH ORDER CHEBYSHEV METHODS WITH RECURRENCE RELATION∗ , 2002 .

[8]  E. Hairer,et al.  Solving Ordinary Differential Equations II: Stiff and Differential-Algebraic Problems , 2010 .

[9]  Muruhan Rathinam,et al.  Stiffness in stochastic chemically reacting systems: The implicit tau-leaping method , 2003 .

[10]  K. Burrage,et al.  Binomial leap methods for simulating stochastic chemical kinetics. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[11]  Muruhan Rathinam,et al.  The numerical stability of leaping methods for stochastic simulation of chemically reacting systems. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[12]  Eric Vanden-Eijnden,et al.  Nested stochastic simulation algorithm for chemical kinetic systems with disparate rates. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[13]  Linda R Petzold,et al.  The slow-scale stochastic simulation algorithm. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[14]  A. Abdulle,et al.  Stabilized methods for stiff stochastic systems , 2007 .

[15]  Eric Vanden-Eijnden,et al.  ON HMM-like integrators and projective integration methods for systems with multiple time scales , 2007 .

[16]  Tiejun Li,et al.  Analysis of Explicit Tau-Leaping Schemes for Simulating Chemically Reacting Systems , 2007, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[17]  Linda R Petzold,et al.  Adaptive explicit-implicit tau-leaping method with automatic tau selection. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[18]  E. Weinan,et al.  Effectiveness of implicit methods for stiff stochastic differential equations , 2008 .

[19]  Assyr Abdulle,et al.  S-ROCK: Chebyshev Methods for Stiff Stochastic Differential Equations , 2008, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[20]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2022 .