Global Position and Position Taking: The Case of Australia

From 1990 to 2003, Australia’s share of the global market in cross-border degrees grew from 1% to 9%. Full fee-paying foreign students now constitute one quarter of enrolments, and education is Australia’s third largest services export. Positioned as an Anglo-American system on the edge of Asia, Australia has differentiated itself from the United States and United Kingdom on price, location, safety, and climate, not academic content. The supply side keys to growth are deregulation and prolonged reductions in the public funding of universities. However, the Shanghai Jiao Tong University survey of research performance finds that Australia is less strong in research than cross-border degrees. Australia’s policy may have negative implications for its longer-term global standing and limit the range of position-taking strategies available to its universities. These themes are explored in the context of the emerging worldwide market and Australian policy changes that have enhanced institutional stratification.

[1]  S. Marginson,et al.  Global Migration and Social Protection Rights , 2005 .

[2]  Simon Marginson,et al.  The public/private divide in higher education: A global revision , 2007 .

[3]  L. Butler,et al.  Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts , 2003 .

[4]  Karine Tremblay,et al.  Academic Mobility and Immigration , 2005 .

[5]  Bruce Jay Nelson,et al.  Our universities: backing Australia’s future , 2003 .

[6]  K. Arrow.  Higher education as a filter , 1973 .

[7]  C. Castoriadis,et al.  The Imaginary Institution of Society , 1987 .

[8]  Regina Dunlea,et al.  Australian Education International (AEI) , 2005 .

[9]  R. Frank,et al.  The Winner-Take-All Society , 1995 .

[10]  R. James,et al.  Which university?: the factors influencing the choices of prospective undergraduates , 1999 .

[11]  Roger King,et al.  The University in the Global Age , 2003 .

[12]  J. Dawkins.  Higher education: a policy discussion paper , 1987 .

[13]  Jan Currie,et al.  Universities and Globalization: Critical Perspectives , 2000 .

[14]  S. Marginson,et al.  Interrogating global flows in higher education , 2005 .

[15]  Rosemary Deem,et al.  Globalisation, New Managerialism, Academic Capitalism and Entrepreneurialism in Universities: Is the local dimension still important? , 2001 .

[16]  Philip G. Altbach,et al.  International handbook of higher education , 2007 .

[17]  Rajani Naidoo.  Fields and institutional strategy: Bourdieu on the relationship between higher education, inequality and society , 2004, Bourdieu and Education.

[18]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  The Field of Cultural Production , 1993 .

[19]  Governing international education in Australia , 2004 .

[20]  G. Soutar,et al.  ¿Push-Pull¿ Factors Influencing International Student Destination Choice , 2002 .

[21]  S. Marginson.  Dynamics of National and Global Competition in Higher Education , 2006 .

[22]  M. Turshen.  Development as Freedom , 2001 .

[23]  Michael Clyne,et al.  Australia's Language Potential , 2005 .

[24]  Rajani Naidoo *,et al.  Empowering participants or corroding learning? Towards a research agenda on the impact of student consumerism in higher education , 2005 .

[25]  Jenny J. Lee,et al.  THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL STUDENT FLOWS: PATTERNS, IDEAS, AND PROPOSITIONS , 2006 .

[26]  Nian Cai Liu,et al.  The Academic Ranking of World Universities. , 2005 .

[27]  S. Marginson,et al.  Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic , 2002 .

[28]  S. Holden.  Education at a Glance , 2006, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Higher Education.

[29]  H. Arndt,et al.  Social limits to growth , 1978 .

[30]  Oecd Ocde.  Education At A Glance , 2005 .

[31]  D. Kirp.  Shakespeare, Einstein, and the Bottom Line: The Marketing of Higher Education , 2003 .

[32]  Anthony Mcgrew,et al.  Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, and Culture , 2000 .