Do individual factors matter? A survey of scientists’ patenting in Portuguese public research organisations

This paper addresses scientists’ behaviour regarding the patenting of knowledge produced in universities and other public sector research organisations (PSROs). Recent years have witnessed a rapid growth in patenting and licensing activities by PSROs. We argue that the whole process depends to a certain extent on scientists’ willingness to disclose their inventions. Given this assumption, we conduct research into individual behaviour in order to understand scientists’ views concerning the patenting of their research results. Data from a questionnaire survey of Portuguese researchers from nine PSROs in life sciences and biotechnology is presented and analysed and complemented with in-depth interviews. The results reveal that overall the scientists surveyed show a low propensity to become involved in patenting and licensing activities, despite the fact that the majority had no “ethical” objections to the disclosure of their inventions and the commercial exploitation of these. Perceptions about the impacts of these activities on certain fundamental aspects of knowledge production and dissemination are however divergent. This may account for the low participation levels. Furthermore, most scientists perceived the personal benefits deriving from this type of activity to be low. Similarly, the majority also believed that there are many difficulties associated with the patenting process and that they receive limited support from their organisations, which lack the proper competences and structures to assist with patenting and licensing.

[1]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[2]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVERS OR MARKETS? , 1998 .

[3]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  Academic Incentives and Research Organization for Patenting at a Large French University , 2004 .

[4]  Janet Bercovitz,et al.  Organizational Structure as a Determinant of Academic Patent and Licensing Behavior: An Exploratory Study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State Universities , 2001 .

[5]  Aldo Geuna,et al.  University Patenting and its Effects on Academic Research , 2003 .

[6]  W. Powell,et al.  To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer , 2001 .

[7]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  What Patent Data Reveal about Universities: The Case of Belgium , 2003 .

[8]  Ricardo Z. N. Vêncio,et al.  Intellectual property and public research in biotechnology: the scientists opinion , 2003, Scientometrics.

[9]  A. Geuna,et al.  University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence , 2006 .

[10]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Do Patents Reflect the Useful Research Output of Universities , 1998 .

[11]  S. Breschi,et al.  Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data , 2004 .

[12]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Privatizing the Intellectual Commons: Universities and the Commercialization of Biotechnology , 1998 .

[13]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[14]  N. Carayol,et al.  Contractual funds and university patents: from analysis to a case study , 2003 .

[15]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation , 1998 .

[16]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Risky Business: Universities and Intellectual Property. , 2001 .

[17]  U. Schmoch,et al.  Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields , 1998 .

[18]  J. Wallmark,et al.  Inventions and patents at universities: the case of Chalmers University of Technology , 1997 .

[19]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventiveness , 2003 .

[20]  Chiara Franzoni,et al.  Is academic patenting detrimental to high quality research? An empirical analysis of the relationship between scientific careers and patent applications , 2004 .

[21]  Margarida Fontes,et al.  The Impact of Biotechnology Pervasiveness and User Heterogeneity on the Organization of Public Sector Research , 2002, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[22]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[23]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Inventive output of academic research: A comparison of two science systems , 2005, Scientometrics.

[24]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities , 2001 .

[25]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  ACADEMIC INCENTIVES, RESEARCH ORGANIZATION AND PATENTING AT A LARGE FRENCH UNIVERSITY , 2007 .

[26]  S. Shane Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Selling University Technology: Patterns from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[28]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Ivory tower and industrial innovation : university-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States , 2004 .

[29]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Who is Selling the Ivory Tower , 2000 .

[30]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  WHO'S PATENTING IN THE UNIVERSITY? EVIDENCE FROM THE SURVEY OF DOCTORATE RECIPIENTS , 2007 .

[31]  Rosa Grimaldi,et al.  Institutional Changes and the Commercialization of Academic Knowledge: A Study of Italian Universities' Patenting Activities Between 1965 and 2002 , 2006 .

[32]  J. Hicks,et al.  The economics of science , 1996 .

[33]  Jason Owen-Smith,et al.  From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities , 2003 .

[34]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Industry funding and university professors' research performance , 2005 .

[35]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[36]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[37]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Management of Intellectual Assets by German Public Research Organisations , 2003 .

[38]  B. Looy,et al.  Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? , 2004 .

[39]  Paul A. David,et al.  The Digital Technology Boomerang: New Intellectual Property Rights Threaten Global “Open Science” , 2005 .

[40]  Andrea Vezzulli,et al.  If Star Scientists do not Patent: an Event History Analysis of Scientific Eminence and the Decision to Patent in the Academic World , 2005 .

[41]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND THE ACADEMIC DEPARTMENT: WHO PARTICIPATES AND WHY? , 2003 .