The Neural Substrates and Timing of Top–Down Processes during Coarse-to-Fine Categorization of Visual Scenes: A Combined fMRI and ERP Study
暂无分享,去创建一个
M. Seghier | G. Thut | C. Michel | P. Vuilleumier | T. Landis | S. Schwartz | C. Marendaz | C. Peyrin
[1] Sheng Li,et al. Learning shapes spatiotemporal brain patterns for flexible categorical decisions. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.
[2] J. Kaiser,et al. Separable neural bases for subprocesses of recognition in working memory. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.
[3] Simone R. Caljouw,et al. Differential effects of a visual illusion on online visual guidance in a stable environment and online adjustments to perturbations , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.
[4] N. Guyader,et al. Residual abilities in age-related macular degeneration to process spatial frequencies during natural scene categorization , 2011, Visual Neuroscience.
[5] S. Rousset,et al. Global precedence effect in audition and vision: evidence for similar cognitive styles across modalities. , 2011, Acta psychologica.
[6] Ming-Liang Gong,et al. Scene Consistency Effect and Its Mechanisms*: Scene Consistency Effect and Its Mechanisms* , 2011 .
[7] O. Houdé,et al. ERP evidence of a meaningfulness impact on visual global/local processing: When meaning captures attention , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[8] Moshe Bar,et al. See it with feeling: affective predictions during object perception , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[9] J. Hegdé. Time course of visual perception: Coarse-to-fine processing and beyond , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.
[10] E. Halgren,et al. Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[11] Christoph M. Michel,et al. Hemispheric specialization of human inferior temporal cortex during coarse-to-fine and fine-to-coarse analysis of natural visual scenes , 2005, NeuroImage.
[12] F. Hamker. The reentry hypothesis: the putative interaction of the frontal eye field, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and areas V4, IT for attention and eye movement. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.
[13] M. Murray,et al. EEG source imaging , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[14] Monica Baciu,et al. Cerebral regions and hemispheric specialization for processing spatial frequencies during natural scene recognition. An event-related fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.
[15] Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al. Scale invariant adaptation in fusiform face-responsive regions , 2004, NeuroImage.
[16] Christoph M. Michel,et al. Electrical neuroimaging based on biophysical constraints , 2004, NeuroImage.
[17] Carole Peyrin,et al. Hemispheric specialization for spatial frequency processing in the analysis of natural scenes , 2003, Brain and Cognition.
[18] M. Bar. A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[19] J. Schall. The neural selection and control of saccades by the frontal eye field. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[20] R. Henson,et al. Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[21] J. Bullier. Integrated model of visual processing , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.
[22] R. Poldrack,et al. Recovering Meaning Left Prefrontal Cortex Guides Controlled Semantic Retrieval , 2001, Neuron.
[23] R. Henson,et al. Frontal lobes and human memory: insights from functional neuroimaging. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[24] M. Bar,et al. Cortical Mechanisms Specific to Explicit Visual Object Recognition , 2001, Neuron.
[25] David J. Freedman,et al. Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex. , 2001, Science.
[26] O. Blanke,et al. Location of the human frontal eye field as defined by electrical cortical stimulation: anatomical, functional and electrophysiological characteristics , 2000, Neuroreport.
[27] Shingo Yamagata,et al. Cerebral Asymmetry of the “Top-Down” Allocation of Attention to Global and Local Features , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[28] Margot J. Taylor,et al. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. , 2000, Psychophysiology.
[29] T. Poggio,et al. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.
[30] Karl J. Friston,et al. Stochastic Designs in Event-Related fMRI , 1999, NeuroImage.
[31] S. Edelman,et al. Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.
[32] O Josephs,et al. Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging: modelling, inference and optimization. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[33] C. Price,et al. Functional Neuroanatomy of the Semantic System: Divisible by What? , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[34] P H Schiller,et al. Visual representations during saccadic eye movements. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[35] A. Oliva,et al. Flexible, Diagnosticity-Driven, Rather Than Fixed, Perceptually Determined Scale Selection in Scene and Face Recognition , 1997, Perception.
[36] Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al. Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? , 1996, Nature.
[37] T. Paus. Location and function of the human frontal eye-field: A selective review , 1996, Neuropsychologia.
[38] J. Bullier,et al. Functional streams in occipito-frontal connections in the monkey , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.
[39] E. Bizzi,et al. The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .
[40] D. Lehmann,et al. Segmentation of brain electrical activity into microstates: model estimation and validation , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[41] A. Oliva,et al. From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition , 1994 .
[42] Shimon Ullman,et al. Visual object recognition , 1993 .
[43] E W Yund,et al. The role of spatial frequency in the processing of hierarchically organized stimuli , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.
[44] J R Lishman,et al. Temporal Integration of Spatially Filtered Visual Images , 1992, Perception.
[45] D R Badcock,et al. Low-Frequency Filtering and the Processing of Local—Global Stimuli , 1990, Perception.
[46] M. Torrens. Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .
[47] L. Robertson,et al. Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[48] Antoine Rémond,et al. Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals , 1987 .
[49] G L Shulman,et al. The Role of Spatial-Frequency Channels in the Perception of Local and Global Structure , 1986, Perception.
[50] J. Robson,et al. Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.
[51] D. Lehmann,et al. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[52] G. Pfurtscheller. Handbook of electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology: A. Rémond (Editor). Vol. 4, Part A: Sampling, Conversion and Measurement of Bioelectrical Phenomena. — F.H. Lopes da Silva (Editor). (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1976, 70 p., 16 Fig., Hfl 25.00) , 1978 .
[53] D. Navon. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.
[54] Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al. Simple reaction time as a measure of the temporal response properties of transient and sustained channels , 1975, Vision Research.
[55] F. Plum. Handbook of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology , 1972 .
[56] R. C. Oldfield. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.
[57] L. Sobin,et al. CO-PLANAR STEREOTAXIC ATLAS OF THE HUMAN BRAIN 3-DIMENSIONAL PROPORTIONAL SYSTEM: AN APPROACH TO CEREBRAL IMAGING 1988 GUIDE TO THE TNM/pTNM-CLASSIFICATION OF MALIGNANT TUMOURS THIRD EDITION , 2007 .
[58] C. Michel,et al. Noninvasive Localization of Electromagnetic Epileptic Activity. I. Method Descriptions and Simulations , 2004, Brain Topography.
[59] C. Michel,et al. Noninvasive Localization of Electromagnetic Epileptic Activity. II. Demonstration of Sublobar Accuracy in Patients with Simultaneous Surface and Depth Recordings , 2004, Brain Topography.
[60] L. Chalupa,et al. The visual neurosciences , 2004 .
[61] Rolando Grave de Peralta,et al. Comparison of Algorithms for the Localization of Focal Sources: Evaluation with simulated data and analysis of experimental data. , 2002 .
[62] G. V. Simpson,et al. Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.
[63] P Girard,et al. Feedback connections act on the early part of the responses in monkey visual cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.
[64] E. DeYoe,et al. Concurrent processing in the primate visual cortex. , 1995 .
[65] M. Posner,et al. The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.
[66] F. Perrin,et al. Mapping of scalp potentials by surface spline interpolation. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[67] D. Lehmann,et al. Principles of spatial analysis , 1987 .
[68] G. Westheimer. Spatial vision. , 1984, Annual review of psychology.
[69] R. C. Oldfield. THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .