Learning, Innovating, and an Emerging Core of Knowledge: A Model for the Growth of Citation Networks

Observations on the connectivity among intellectual artifacts often confirm a core-periphery structure: A clustered group of artifacts possess the core knowledge to the field, which is widely cited in artifacts at periphery. We explain this as an outcome resulted from knowledge innovating and knowledge seeking of individual players in the epistemic society. Our analytical model also sheds insights on how the heterogeneity of knowledge artifacts affects knowledge supply and the characteristics of knowledge core. We find through simulation that the core-periphery architecture of knowledge-semantic networks is robust to generalizations on artifact heterogeneity and knowledge creativity. When agent's information on existing knowledge is incomplete, "subcore"s might emerge from localized knowledge spillover. By studying the incentive rationale that underlies the growth of knowledge field, our research has implication on the design and practice of scientific/epistemic communities.

[1]  R. Gibbons.  Game theory for applied economists , 1992 .

[2]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[3]  R. Kranton,et al.  Strategic Interaction and Networks , 2010 .

[4]  Patrick Doreian,et al.  Structural equivalence in a psychology journal network , 1985, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[5]  N. Mullins,et al.  The Group Structure of Cocitation Clusters: A Comparative Study , 1977 .

[6]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence , 1998 .

[7]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2004 .

[8]  Daniel J. Brass.  Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. , 1984 .

[9]  P. Bonacich.  Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[11]  Myeonghwan Cho.  Endogenous formation of networks for local public goods , 2010, Int. J. Game Theory.

[12]  Joao Antonio Pereira,et al.  Linked: The new science of networks , 2002 .

[13]  Rob Cross,et al.  A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[14]  A. Galeotti,et al.  The Law of the Few , 2010 .

[15]  Yann Bramoullé,et al.  Public goods in networks , 2007, J. Econ. Theory.

[16]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[17]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[18]  R. Cowan.  Network models of innovation and knowledge diffusion , 2004 .

[19]  C. S. Weng,et al.  Core/periphery structure of the technological network , 2009, PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[20]  Daniel A. Hojman,et al.  Core and periphery in networks , 2008, J. Econ. Theory.

[21]  Amitabh Sinha,et al.  Efficient Structures for Innovative Social Networks , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[22]  A. Elzinga.  The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[23]  R. Nelson,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers and Inequality , 2002 .

[24]  Mary Anne Devanna.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[25]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Graphs over time: densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations , 2005, KDD '05.

[26]  Hazhir Rahmandad,et al.  Heterogeneity and Network Structure in the Dynamics of Diffusion: Comparing Agent-Based and Differential Equation Models , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Models of core/periphery structures , 2000, Soc. Networks.