Mixing s orbitals into p and d orbitals. An attempt at bridging the angular overlap model and the valence shell electron pair repulsion model. Critique of the cellular ligand-field model

Abstract The stereochemistries of main group molecules have been discussed by using the angular overlap model in its molecular orbital oriented form (MO-AOM). Either ligand-field stabilisation of the ground state s 2 p q −2 configuration, or s-p mixing, or both, provide a consistent bonding model for the stereochemistries. The transformation of the non-bonding orbitals into equivalent orbitals leads invariably to agreement with the lone-pair locations of the valence shell electron pair repulsion (VSEPR) model. The concepts of Hamiltonian-generated hybrids and pseudohemispherical molecular systems are found useful in this context. The MO-AOM formalism is also used for discussing s-d mixing in transition metal systems, and the energetic consequences within the ligand-field AOM (LF-AOM) are included. This is a second-order effect, which depends on squares and cross-products of radial parameters. It may still be quite large for tetragonal systems and for systems that deviate strongly from orthoaxiality. The usual ligand-additive property of the AOM is lost when the symmetry is lower than tetragonal and so is the energy separability into angular and radial factors. The cellular ligand-field model is found to be identical with the LF-AOM, except that its users consider it important not to acknowledge the formal hierarchy, MO-AOM⊃LF-AOM, as relevant. The unintelligible concept of an active coordination void is found to be unnecessary and insufficient.

[1]  C. E. Schäffer The angular overlap model of the ligand field: theory and applications , 1970 .

[2]  A. Ceulemans,et al.  ds-mixing as a rationale for structural similarities between hexacoordinated Ni(II)-and Cu(II)-complexes , 1982 .

[3]  H. Yamatera,et al.  Ligand field of conjugated bidentate ligands parametrized by the angular overlap model , 1991 .

[4]  R. Bader,et al.  A physical basis for the VSEPR model of molecular geometry , 1988 .

[5]  rgensen,et al.  Do the ``Ligand Field'' Parameters in Lanthanides Represent Weak Covalent Bonding? , 1963 .

[6]  J. Bendix,et al.  Quantitative formulation of ligand field theory by the use of orthonormal operators. Exemplification by means of pq systems , 1989 .

[7]  H. Yamatera On the Absorption Spectra of Hexamminecobalt (III) and Related Complexes. II. Theoretical Study on Shifting and Spilitting of the First and the Second Band Due to Substitution of Ligands , 1958 .

[8]  Eugen Reichel,et al.  1. A - C , 1909 .

[9]  J. P. Dahl,et al.  Understanding Molecular Properties , 1987 .

[10]  M. A. Hitchman,et al.  Polarized crystal spectrum of bis(methylphenethylammonium) tetrachlorocuprate(II): analysis of the energies, vibrational fine structure, and temperature dependence of the "d-d" transitions of the planar tetrachlorocuprate(2-) ion , 1979 .

[11]  M. Gerloch Magnetism and ligand-field analysis , 1983 .

[12]  C. Jørgensen Modern aspects of ligand field theory , 1971 .

[13]  H. Schmidtke,et al.  Optical properties of Ni[tbu2P(O)NR]2: A paramagnetic d8 complex with planar structure , 1994 .

[14]  C. Jørgensen,et al.  The angular overlap model, an attempt to revive the ligand field approaches , 1965 .