A comparison of physical image quality indices and observer performance in the radiographic detection of nylon beads.

Although various models have been proposed in an attempt to predict the usefulness of a radiographic image in terms of its physical characteristics, no previous work has shown whether a single physical image quality index, such as a signal-to-noise ratio, can reliably predict the performance of a human observer over a broad range of image characteristics. We studied the relationship between physical and visual image quality for the task of detecting nylon beads in radiographs. Thirty-seven imaging cases with different combinations of physical image characteristics were considered; these included variations in object size and magnification, X-ray beam quality, screen-film system, screen-film contact, film density and illumination, and viewing distance. For each imaging case, visual image quality was quantified in terms of observer performance in a 2AFC visual detection experiment. Physical image quality indices were calculated according to eight different models of the detection process; these indices combined data regarding object size and attenuation, screen-film system MTF, film gradient, noise Wiener spectrum, and visual system response. The results of this work indicate that, for the conditions studied, human observer detection performance most closely resembles that of a sub-optimal statistical decision process.

[1]  S. Nudelman.  Photoelectronic imaging devices , 1971 .

[2]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[3]  H R BLACKWELL,et al.  Contrast thresholds of the human eye. , 1946, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[4]  C E Metz,et al.  Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns. , 1984, Radiology.

[5]  Philip F. Judy,et al.  Lesion detection and signal–to–noise ratio in CT images , 1981 .

[6]  A D Schnitzler.  Image-detector model and parameters of the human visual system. , 1973, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  John A. Swets,et al.  Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory , 1982 .

[8]  A. Rose,et al.  Vision: human and electronic , 1973 .

[9]  J. Coltman.  The Specification of Imaging Properties by Response to a Sine Wave Input , 1954 .

[10]  A. Rose.  The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale. , 1948, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[11]  Information Capacity of Radiographic Images , 1968 .

[12]  O. Schade.  Optical and photoelectric analog of the eye. , 1956, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[13]  Otto H. Schade.  An Evaluation of Photographic Image Quality and Resolving Power , 1964 .

[14]  Peter Fellgett.  Concerning Photographic Grain, Signal-to-Noise Ratio, and Information , 1953 .

[15]  M. Hollander,et al.  Statistics: A Biomedical Introduction. , 1977 .

[16]  J. L. Harris.  Resolving Power and Decision Theory , 1964 .

[17]  G. Turin,et al.  An introduction to matched filters , 1960, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[18]  E. H. Linfoot,et al.  On the assessment of optical images , 1955, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[19]  K Rossmann,et al.  New device for accurate measurement of the x-ray intensity distribution of x-ray tube focal spots. , 1975, Medical physics.

[20]  K. Hanson,et al.  Detectability in computed tomographic images. , 1979, Medical physics.

[21]  K Rossmann,et al.  X-ray sensitometer for screen-film combinations used in medical radiology. , 1970, Radiology.

[22]  A. E. Anderson,et al.  Noise Limitations to Resolving Power in Electronic Imaging , 1960, Proceedings of the IRE.

[23]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[24]  L N Loo,et al.  Effect of crossover exposure on radiographic image quality of screen-film systems. , 1981, Radiology.

[25]  L N Loo,et al.  X-ray tube focal spot sizes: comprehensive studies of their measurement and effect of measured size in angiography. , 1982, Radiology.

[26]  Information Theory and Photographic Images , 1959 .

[27]  K. Doi,et al.  X-ray images of small blood vessels in angiography: question of isoplanatism. , 1975, Medical physics.

[28]  I. Gorog,et al.  Visual processing of simple two-dimensional sine-wave luminance gratings , 1977, Vision Research.

[29]  Friedell Hl,et al.  RADIOLOGIC AND ALLIED PROCEDURES FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF INFORMATION CONTENT AND VISUAL PERCEPTION. , 1965 .

[30]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Paul R. Moran.  Physical Constraints in the Optimization of Medical Imaging Filters for Maximum Signal-to-Noise Ratio , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  P R Moran.  A physical statistics theory for detectability of target signals in noisy images. I. Mathematical background, empirical review, and development of theory. , 1982, Medical physics.

[33]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Application of information theory to the assessment of computed tomography. , 1979, Medical physics.

[34]  K Rossmann.  Comparison of several methods for evaluating image quality of radiographic screen-film systems. , 1966, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[35]  K. Doi,et al.  Determination of radiographic screen-film system characteristic curve and its gradient by use of a curve-smoothing technique. , 1978, Medical physics.

[36]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .