Operating experiences from existing fusion facilities in view of ITER safety and reliability

Abstract The objective of this ongoing activity is to develop a fusion specific component failure database useful to quantify probabilistic safety assessment, support design activity, quantify reliability, availability, maintainability, and inspectability (RAMI) analyses, and support any other uses where field experience can provide feedback to fusion facility design and operation. The data collection began in 1989. At first, it was to “harvest” already-published data from high-technology industries. Later, attention was also directed to collecting and analyzing operating experience data from existing tokamaks and other fusion experiments. Operating experience of European, American and Japanese facilities are being investigated. The main studies performed thus far have been on JET systems (such as Vacuum, Active Gas Handling (AGH), Neutral Beam Injectors, Power Supply and Ion Cyclotron Resonant Heating systems), ASDEX Electron Cyclotron Resonant Heating system, and the Tore Supra cryogenics, superconducting magnet and water cooling system of plasma facing component for Europe; DIII-D, TFTR, Tritium Systems Test Assembly and other facilities for the United States; and the Tritium Processing Laboratory for Japan. Additional systems will be investigated in the future. The paper is dedicated to give an overview on the overall activity, with indication of references, and a global overview on availability of different fusion devices.

[1]  J. Y. Journeaux,et al.  Availability analysis of five years of operation of the superconducting tokamak Tore Supra , 1997 .

[2]  R. A. Camp,et al.  TFTR CAMAC power supplies reliability , 1989, IEEE Thirteenth Symposium on Fusion Engineering.

[3]  L. C. Cadwallader,et al.  Secondary Containment System component failure data analysis from 1984 to 1991 , 1992 .

[4]  G. Oliaro,et al.  The NSTX trouble reporting system , 2002 .

[5]  Gilio Cambi,et al.  Data collection on component malfunctions and failures of JET ICRH system , 2008 .

[6]  J. Y. Journeaux,et al.  Pioneering superconducting magnets in large tokamaks: Evaluation after 16 years of operating experience in tore supra , 2005 .

[7]  P. I. Petersen Systematic characterization of component failures for the DIII–D tokamak , 2000 .

[8]  Javier Dies,et al.  Fusion component failure rate database (FCFR-DB) , 2006 .

[9]  L. C. Cadwallader,et al.  Tritium room air monitor component failure data analysis from January 1, 1984 to December 31, 1990 , 1991 .

[10]  D. Bashore,et al.  Operation of a Fluorinert cooling system for the TFTR TF coils and TFTR Coil Flowswitch Monitoring System modification to accommodate the TF Alternate Cooling System (Fluorinert) , 1993, 15th IEEE/NPSS Symposium. Fusion Engineering.

[11]  Maria Teresa Porfiri,et al.  Collection and analysis of occupational radiation exposure data from the jet tokamak , 2005 .

[12]  G. Gantenbein,et al.  Operation Experience with the ASDEX Upgrade ECRH System , 2009 .

[13]  P. I. Petersen,et al.  Power Supply Reliability Estimates for Experimental Fusion Facilities , 2006 .

[14]  L. C. Cadwallader,et al.  Tritium Waste Treatment System component failure data analysis from June 18, 1984--December 31, 1989 , 1990 .

[15]  L. C. Cadwallader,et al.  Tritium Room Air Monitor Operating Experience Review , 2008 .

[16]  Tonio Pinna,et al.  Collection and analysis of data related to fusion machines (JET and TLK) operating experience on component failure , 2005 .

[17]  L.C. Cadwallader,et al.  Reliability estimates for oxygen monitors , 2003, 20th IEEE/NPSS Symposium onFusion Engineering, 2003..

[18]  Masayuki Yamada,et al.  Operational Results of the Safety Systems of the Tritium Process Laboratory of the Japan Atomic Energy Agency , 2008 .

[19]  Lee C. Cadwallader Comparison of Tritium Component Failure Rate Data , 2004 .

[20]  L. C. Cadwallader,et al.  Confinement Reliability Estimates for Vacuum System Components , 2003 .

[21]  Tonio Pinna,et al.  TFTR occupational radiation exposure data collection and analysis , 2005 .

[22]  L. C. Cadwallader Occupational Injury Rate Estimates in Magnetic Fusion Experiments , 2006 .

[23]  Ensign Johnson,et al.  certainly helpful, theimprovement realized byproper(5) Reactor Safety Study, "Appendix III -Failure data," USNuclear weighting isstill evident evenwhenthes-bias parameters Regulatory Commission Report WASH-1400, NUREG-75/014, , 1984 .

[24]  P. I. Petersen,et al.  The DIII-D tokamak TROUBLE report database , 1991, [Proceedings] The 14th IEEE/NPSS Symposium Fusion Engineering.

[25]  L. C. Cadwallader,et al.  Comparisons of facility-specific and generic component failure rates for tritium-bearing components used in fusion research , 2001 .

[26]  Kathleen M. Gruetzmacher,et al.  Data base for failure/maintenance at the tritium systems test assembly , 1986 .

[27]  Tonio Pinna,et al.  Collection and analysis of component failure data from jet systems: neutral beam injectors and power supply , 2007 .

[28]  I. J. Zatz Final examination and testing of the TFTR TF-Coils , 2003 .