Fostering Team Innovation: Why Is It Important to Combine Opposing Action Strategies?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Henrik Bresman,et al. External Learning Activities and Team Performance: A Multimethod Field Study , 2010, Organ. Sci..
[2] J. Birkinshaw,et al. Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .
[3] L. Weingart,et al. Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams , 2007 .
[4] Allen C. Amason,et al. Don't Take it Personally: Exploring Cognitive Conflict as a Mediator of Affective Conflict , 2007 .
[5] Felix C. Brodbeck,et al. Group Decision Making Under Conditions of Distributed Knowledge: The Information Asymmetries Model. , 2007 .
[6] Ken G. Smith,et al. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .
[7] S. Clegg. The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies , 2006 .
[8] Deborah Dougherty,et al. Organizing for Innovation in the 21st Century , 2006 .
[9] Wendy K. Smith,et al. Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .
[10] Teresa M. Amabile,et al. Affect and Creativity at Work , 2005 .
[11] G. V. D. Vegt,et al. Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification , 2005 .
[12] Ken G. Smith,et al. Existing Knowledge, Knowledge Creation Capability, and the Rate of New Product Introduction in High-Technology Firms , 2005 .
[13] Sandra E. Spataro,et al. Using Self-Categorization Theory to Understand Relational Demography–Based Variations in People's Responsiveness to Organizational Culture , 2005 .
[14] David Obstfeld. Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .
[15] Dorothy A. Leonard,et al. When Sparks Fly: Harnessing the Power of Group Creativity , 2005 .
[16] Aimée A. Kane,et al. Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality , 2005 .
[17] G. Labianca,et al. Group Social Capital and Group Effectiveness: The Role of Informal Socializing Ties , 2004 .
[18] C. D. De Dreu,et al. Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.
[19] Asako Miura,et al. Synergy between Diversity and Similarity in Group-Idea Generation , 2004 .
[20] Zi-Lin He,et al. Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..
[21] Claus W. Langfred. Too Much of a Good Thing? Negative Effects of High Trust and Individual Autonomy in Self-Managing Teams , 2004 .
[22] J. Birkinshaw,et al. THE ANTECEDENTS, CONSEQUENCES AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .
[23] S. Jackson,et al. Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications , 2003 .
[24] D. Beal,et al. Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.
[25] Deanne N. Den Hartog,et al. Diversity and team outcomes: the moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity , 2003 .
[26] C. D. De Dreu,et al. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.
[27] Marianne W. Lewis,et al. Control and Collaboration: Paradoxes of Governance , 2003 .
[28] K. Atuahene–Gima,et al. The Effects of Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces on Product Development Speed and Quality: How Does Problem Solving Matter? , 2003 .
[29] Mary J. Benner,et al. Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .
[30] R. Katila,et al. SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .
[31] Joseph T. Banas,et al. Comparing Alternative Conceptualizations of Functional Diversity in Management Teams: Process and Performance Effects , 2002 .
[32] Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al. Integrating Knowledge in Groups: How Formal Interventions Enable Flexibility , 2002, Organ. Sci..
[33] Marianne W. Lewis,et al. PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TENSIONS: EXPLORING CONTRASTING STYLES OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT , 2002 .
[34] S. Clegg,et al. Management Paradoxes: A Relational View , 2002 .
[35] S. Taggar. Individual Creativity and Group Ability to Utilize Individual Creative Resources: A Multilevel Model , 2002 .
[36] Willow A. Sheremata. Finding and solving problems in software new product development , 2002 .
[37] Deborah Dougherty,et al. Reimagining the Differentiation and Integration of Work for Sustained Product Innovation , 2001 .
[38] R. Wageman. How Leaders Foster Self-Managing Team Effectiveness: Design Choices Versus Hands-on Coaching , 2001 .
[39] Debra L. Shapiro,et al. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. , 2001 .
[40] Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al. Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .
[41] S. Mohammed,et al. Cognitive Diversity and Consensus in Group Decision Making: The Role of Inputs, Processes, and Outcomes. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.
[42] R. Lord,et al. Leadership, values, and subordinate self-concepts , 2001 .
[43] R. Keller,et al. Cross-Functional Project Groups in Research and New Product Development: Diversity, Communications, Job Stress, and Outcomes , 2001 .
[44] E. Mannix,et al. The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .
[45] Laura B. Cardinal. Technological Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Use of Organizational Control in Managing Research and Development , 2001 .
[46] Marianne W. Lewis. Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide , 2000 .
[47] Kerrie L. Unsworth,et al. Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas , 2000 .
[48] Kenneth S. Law,et al. CONFLICT MANAGEMENT, EFFICACY, AND PERFORMANCE IN ORGANIZATIONAL TEAMS , 2000 .
[49] L. Argote,et al. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .
[50] Willow A. Sheremata. Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces in Radical New Product Development Under Time Pressure , 2000 .
[51] J. Mathieu,et al. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.
[52] R. Peterson,et al. Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .
[53] Evelyn Fenton,et al. Complexities and Dualities in Innovative Forms of Organizing , 2000 .
[54] Ken A. Smith,et al. Making Use of Difference: Diversity, Debate, and Decision Comprehensiveness in Top Management Teams , 1999 .
[55] Michael Frese,et al. Helping to improve suggestion systems: predictors of making suggestions in companies , 1999 .
[56] G. Northcraft,et al. You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .
[57] Diether Gebert,et al. The Open and the Closed Corporation as Conflicting forms of Organization , 1999 .
[58] K. Eisenhardt,et al. Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .
[59] R. Nisbett,et al. Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. , 1999 .
[60] Sigal G. Barsade,et al. Being Different Yet Feeling Similar: The Influence Of Demographic Composition And Organizational Culture On Work Processes And Outcomes , 1998 .
[61] Colin Camerer,et al. Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .
[62] Subodh P. Kulkarni,et al. Winning through Innovation: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal , 1998 .
[63] Robert G. Lord,et al. Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange , 1997 .
[64] K. Eisenhardt,et al. The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .
[65] D. Tjosvold. Conflict within interdependence: Its value for productivity and individuality. , 1997 .
[66] M. Glynn. Innovative Genius: A Framework for Relating Individual and Organizational Intelligences to Innovation , 1996 .
[67] A. Kruglanski,et al. Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.
[68] J. Cacioppo,et al. DISPOSITIONAL DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE MOTIVATION : THE LIFE AND TIMES OF INDIVIDUALS VARYING IN NEED FOR COGNITION , 1996 .
[69] R. A. Cooke,et al. The Impact of Group Interaction Styles on Problem-Solving Effectiveness , 1994 .
[70] Jeffrey D. Ford,et al. Logics of Identity, Contradiction, and Attraction in Change , 1994 .
[71] R. Keller,et al. Technology-Information Processing Fit and the Performance of R&D Project Groups: A Test of Contingency Theory , 1994 .
[72] Deborah G. . Ancona,et al. Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .
[73] J. March. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.
[74] E. Schein. Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .
[75] C. Gersick. REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .
[76] K. Cameron,et al. Paradox and transformation : toward a theory of change in organization and management , 1990 .
[77] K. Cameron,et al. Organizational paradox and transformation. , 1988 .
[78] Mark S. Granovetter. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.
[79] R. Katz. The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance. , 1982 .
[80] Frank M. Andrews,et al. Scientists in Organizations , 1968 .
[81] P. Lawrence,et al. Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .
[82] A. Pettigrew,et al. The Innovating organization , 2000 .
[83] Tom R. Burns,et al. The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .