Effects of Clothing Attractiveness on Perceptions

In many physical attractiveness studies, it is clothing and other appearance vari ables that are manipulated, not actual physical beauty, in order to vary physical attractiveness. Thus, results that have been attributed to physical attractiveness may actually be due to clothing attractiveness. The purpose of this research was to determine whether people perceive others differentially as a function of the attractiveness of their clothing. Slides of six different models in business attire, three wearing attractive clothing and three wearing unattractive clothing, served as stimuli. Fifty-nine participants listened to a pre-recorded audio tape consisting of 30 suggestions relative to marketing a perfume. As a comment was heard, a slide of the woman purported to have made the comment was projected. Sub jects rated the women on competence, work comfort, and sociability. Multivari ate and univariate analyses of variance revealed that, as expected, models dressed in attractive clothing were perceived more positively than models dressed in unattractive clothing on each of the three dependent variables. These results provide some support for a clothing attractiveness stereotype that may function analogously to the well-documented physical attractiveness stereotype. It is known that physical attractiveness, a variable over which one has little control, exerts a potent influence in social situations. These results imply that clothing attractiveness, a variable over which one has potential control, might exert a similar influence.

[1]  J. Haefner,et al.  THE PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS STEREOTYPE USING DRESS AS A FACILITATOR , 1984 .

[2]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Algebra: Integration Theory Applied to Social Attribution1 , 1974 .

[3]  E. Walster,et al.  The Effect of Physical Attractiveness on Teacher Expectations , 2012 .

[4]  Gordon L. Patzer,et al.  The Physical Attractiveness Phenomena , 1985 .

[5]  Influence of Clothing and Physical Attractiveness in Person Perception , 1976 .

[6]  H. M. Buckley Perceptions of Physical Attractiveness as Manipulated by Dress: Subjects Versus Independent Judges , 1983 .

[7]  K. Dion,et al.  Physical attractiveness and evaluation of children's transgressions. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. , 1978 .

[9]  G. William Walster,et al.  Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis☆ , 1971 .

[10]  Lawrence M. Ward,et al.  Pattern of performance and ability attribution: An unexpected primacy effect. , 1968 .

[11]  Hilda Mayer Buckley,et al.  Toward an Operational Definition of Dress , 1985 .

[12]  Harold Sigall,et al.  Liking for an evaluator as a function of her physical attractiveness and nature of the evaluations , 1969 .

[13]  E. Berscheid,et al.  Physical Attractiveness and Peer Perception Among Children , 1974 .

[14]  Susan Sprecher,et al.  Mirror, Mirror: The Importance of Looks in Everyday Life , 1985 .

[15]  Francis T. McAndrew,et al.  The Influence of Physical Attractiveness and Manner of Dress on Success in a Simulated Personnel Decision , 1985 .

[16]  J. Crocker,et al.  The Attractive Executive: Effects of Sex of Business Associates on Attributions of Competence and Social Skills , 1985 .

[17]  R. Friend,et al.  Leaning Over Backwards Jurors ‘Responses to Defendants’Attractiveness , 1974 .

[18]  A. Miller Role of physical attractiveness in impression formation , 1970 .

[19]  Richard M. Lerner,et al.  Pretty pleases: The effects of physical attractiveness, race, and sex on receiving help , 1976 .

[20]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Cognitive Bases of Stereotyping , 1982 .

[21]  Kim K. P. Johnson,et al.  Dress and Physical Attractiveness of Women in Job Interviews , 1987 .

[22]  E. Walster,et al.  Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Harold Sigall,et al.  Radiating beauty: Effects of having a physically attractive partner on person perception. , 1973 .

[24]  Harold Sigall,et al.  Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer's physical attractiveness. , 1974 .

[25]  D. Umberson,et al.  The impact of physical attractiveness on achievement and psychological well-being. , 1987 .

[26]  E. Aronson,et al.  OPINION CHANGE AS A FUNCTION OF THE COMMUNICATOR'S ATTRACTIVENESS AND DESIRE TO INFLUENCE. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Kim K. P. Johnson,et al.  The Influence of Physical Attractiveness and Dress on Campus Recruiters' Impressions of Female Job Applicants. , 1987 .

[28]  James M. Dabbs join,et al.  Beauty is Power: The Use of Space on the Sidewalk , 1975 .

[29]  David M. Lane,et al.  Generalizing across stimuli as well as subjects: A neglected aspect of external validity. , 1985 .

[30]  S. Lennon Physical Attractiveness, Age, And Body Type , 1988 .

[31]  J. Hartnett,et al.  Social Facilitation Theory and Experimenter Attractiveness , 1976 .

[32]  R. Kleck,et al.  Physical attractiveness, perceived attitude similarity, and interpersonal attraction in an opposite-sex encounter. , 1975 .

[33]  Mary Ellen Roach,et al.  Attraction as a Function of Attitudes and Dress , 1981 .

[34]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.