Contingency management in flexible manufacturing systems using modal state logic

Abstract Flexible manufacturing systems (FMSs), while offering a comprehensive answer to current demand for wide product diversity and short time to market, incur higher probability of functional failures due to the greater complexity of the system. Unless appropriate measures are taken, frequent failures will not only interrupt the operations of the system but also expose operating personnel to greater risks. Incorporating an appropriate contingency management capability in FMSs will enable the system to automatically recover from a failure and continue operating. Modal state logic provides a model-based control and monitoring methodology to trap and locate faults as well as to diagnose their causes. Modal state logic combines the notions of necessity and possibility from modal logic while operating within the finite state automata formalism. The framework for using modal state logic as a strategy in contingency management in FMSs is developed. This is considered to be a robust strategy as it is a nonprocedural approach that is not limited to what the controller designer predicts concerning system unreliability prior to system operations.

[1]  Madan G. Singh,et al.  Reliability of computer and control systems , 1987 .

[2]  Ralph Roberts Zone logic: A unique method of practical artificial intelligence , 1989 .

[3]  R. Kuivanen,et al.  Disturbances in Flexible Manufacturing , 1988 .

[4]  Saul A. Kripke,et al.  Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I Normal Modal Propositional Calculi , 1963 .

[5]  Steven H. Kim,et al.  Design and control of manufacturing systems: an integrated approach based on modal logic and zonecharts , 1989 .

[6]  G. E. Deacon,et al.  Knowledge-based robotic assembly - a step further towards flexibility , 1987 .

[7]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  Knowledge Based Error Recovery in Industrial Robots , 1983, IJCAI.

[8]  Sebastiano Bagnara,et al.  Error Analysis in Man-Machine Systems , 1989 .

[9]  Leonard Linsky,et al.  Reference and modality , 1971 .

[10]  Peter J. Ramadge Supervisory control of discrete event systems: A survey and some new results , 1988 .

[11]  Jeffrey D. Ullman,et al.  Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation , 1979 .

[12]  Frank DiCesare,et al.  Extending error recovery capability in manufacturing by machine reasoning , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[13]  Neil F. Stewart,et al.  A robotic interface permitting error recovery , 1987, Robotics.

[14]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  Adaptive design of Petri net controllers for error recovery in automated manufacturing systems , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[15]  Giuseppina C. Gini,et al.  Towards Automatic Error Recovery in Robot Programs , 1983, IJCAI.

[16]  Kaan Egilmez,et al.  Coordination of Multiple Agents through Modal State Logic and Influence Specifications; Part II, Applications , 1991 .

[17]  Igor Aleksander,et al.  Automata theory : an engineering approach , 1975 .