Daylight control and performance in office buildings using a novel ceramic louvre system

Abstract This study examined the design and daylight performance of a new louvre screen for office buildings. The screen was evaluated for three different material finishes: specular aluminium as a traditional material commonly used in louvres, and two types of ceramic finishes, with the intention to reduce the systems’ environmental impact. The new system was assessed taking an unshaded window, a window with a rod screen and a window with venetian blinds as references. Annual performance simulations for a full-scale room, using the lighting software Daysim, were conducted to assess the effect of the three material systems on indoor daylighting levels and distributions using both the traditional Daylight Factor and climate-based daylighting metrics (Daylight Autonomy DA and Useful Daylight Illuminance UDI). The results show that the proposed louvre system can provide satisfactory daylight levels and visual comfort within the room, while ceramics appear as a promising alternative material to be used in the production of advanced daylighting technologies.

[1]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[2]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[3]  A. Athienitis,et al.  The impact of shading design and control on building cooling and lighting demand , 2007 .

[4]  Svetlana Olbina,et al.  Daylighting and thermal performance of automated split-controlled blinds , 2012 .

[5]  H. Barshilia,et al.  Review of physical vapor deposited (PVD) spectrally selective coatings for mid- and high-temperature solar thermal applications , 2012 .

[6]  Martin Bechthold,et al.  Die bunte Welt der Architekturkeramik / The Colorful World of Architectural Ceramics Keramische Bausysteme in Architektur und Innenarchitektur / Ceramic Material Systems in Architecture and Interior Design , 2015 .

[7]  R Urbano Gutiérrez,et al.  Innovations in the production of ceramic luminous environments: where craftsman meets computer , 2016 .

[8]  Fernanda Rodrigues,et al.  Literature review on the use of phase change materials in glazing and shading solutions , 2016 .

[9]  Steve Sharples,et al.  Assessing the environmental and economic impacts of cladding systems for green buildings , 2014 .

[10]  Athanassios Tzempelikos,et al.  The impact of venetian blind geometry and tilt angle on view, direct light transmission and interior illuminance , 2008 .

[11]  Alfonso Soler,et al.  Light shelf performance in Madrid, Spain , 1997 .

[12]  Helmut Köster.  Dynamic Daylighting Architecture: Basics, Systems, Projects , 2004 .

[13]  Andrew S. Glassner,et al.  Principles of Digital Image Synthesis , 1995 .

[14]  François Garde,et al.  Assessment of the thermal and visual efficiency of solar shades , 2011 .

[15]  Theodoros Theodosiou,et al.  Embodied energy in residential buildings-towards the nearly zero energy building: A literature review , 2016 .

[16]  H. Weinlaeder,et al.  Monitoring results of an interior sun protection system with integrated latent heat storage , 2011 .

[17]  Chia-Yen Lee,et al.  Optimal sun-shading design for enhanced daylight illumination of subtropical classrooms , 2008 .

[18]  Ignacio Zabalza Bribián,et al.  Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential , 2011 .

[19]  Dariush Arasteh,et al.  Zero Energy Windows , 2006 .

[20]  Stephen Selkowitz,et al.  Thermal and daylighting performance of an automated venetian blind and lighting system in a full-scale private office , 1998 .

[21]  R. G. Hopkinson.  Architectural physics lighting , 1963 .

[22]  Stephen Selkowitz,et al.  The New York Times headquarters daylighting mockup: Monitored performance of the daylighting control system , 2006 .

[23]  Athanasios Tzempelikos,et al.  Efficient venetian blind control strategies considering daylight utilization and glare protection , 2013 .

[24]  Jian Yao,et al.  An investigation into the impact of movable solar shades on energy, indoor thermal and visual comfort improvements , 2014 .

[25]  Alfonso Soler,et al.  Indoor daylight climate–influence of light shelf and model reflectance on light shelf performance in Madrid for hours with unit sunshine fraction , 2002 .

[26]  Katsumi Niwa,et al.  BIO SKIN Urban Cooling Facade , 2011 .

[27]  John Mardaljevic,et al.  Dynamic Daylight Performance Metrics for Sustainable Building Design , 2006 .

[28]  Philip C.H. Yu,et al.  Energy use in commercial buildings in Hong Kong , 2001 .

[29]  Asterios Agkathidis,et al.  Incorporating Digital Tools with Ceramic Crafting: Design and Fabrication of Light Diffusing Screen Shells , 2016 .

[30]  Nicholas Madamopoulos,et al.  Daylight and thermal harvesting performance evaluation of a liquid filled prismatic façade using the Radiance five-phase method and EnergyPlus , 2017 .

[31]  Geoffrey P. Hammond,et al.  Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials , 2008 .

[32]  Andreas K. Athienitis,et al.  Manually-operated window shade patterns in office buildings: A critical review , 2013 .

[33]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[34]  I. G. Capeluto,et al.  Evaluating visual comfort and performance of three natural lighting systems for deep office buildings in highly luminous climates , 2006 .

[35]  David Moreno,et al.  Climate-based daylight analysis of fixed shading devices in an open-plan office , 2016 .

[36]  Romeu Vicente,et al.  Thermal performance of a window shutter containing PCM: Numerical validation and experimental analysis , 2016 .

[37]  Lisa Iwamoto,et al.  Digital Fabrications: Architectural and Material Techniques , 2009 .