Estimating behavioral changes for transportation modes after terrorist attacks in London, Madrid, and Tokyo

Why do individuals change their behavior after terrorist attacks? To what extent do changes in risk perception explain changes in travel behavior? This project aims to answer these questions by examining three major attacks in recent history on public transit systems: the London bombings in July 2005, the Madrid bombings on March 11, 2004, and the Sarin Gas attacks in Tokyo on March 20, 1995. Each case is found to be unique. Reductions in passenger journeys on attacked transportation modes range from an average of 10 percent over 20 weeks in London to no significant change in Tokyo, while substitution to alternative modes also varies across cases. This variance is likely due to more than cultural difference, with primary attack characteristics, transportation system factors, and the social amplification of risk perceptions also playing a role. Such findings have important implications for policy makers and academics with an interest in transportation security and the behavioral and economic impacts of terrorist attacks.

[1]  中小企業銀行企劃調査部 運輸業 事業體 調査報告 = Transportation census , 1965 .

[2]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[3]  P. Slovic,et al.  A comparative analysis of risk perception in Hungary and the United States , 1986 .

[4]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[5]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework , 1988 .

[6]  Tadeusz Tyszka,et al.  Risk perception in Poland: A comparison with three other countries , 1991 .

[7]  Karl Dake Orienting Dispositions in the Perception of Risk , 1991 .

[8]  R. Kleinhesselink Cognitive representation of risk perceptions-A comparison of Japan and United States , 1991 .

[9]  R. Kasperson The social amplification of risk: progress in developing an integrative framework of risk’, in S. , 1992 .

[10]  N. Sanders,et al.  Journal of behavioral decision making: "The need for contextual and technical knowledge in judgmental forecasting", 5 (1992) 39-52 , 1992 .

[11]  Chris Chatfield,et al.  Calculating Interval Forecasts , 1993 .

[12]  E. Weber,et al.  Cross‐Cultural Differences in Risk Perception: A Model‐Based Approach , 1997 .

[13]  L Sjöberg,et al.  Worry and Risk Perception , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  K. B. Olson,et al.  Aum Shinrikyo: once and future threat? , 1999, Emerging infectious diseases.

[15]  R. Worthley,et al.  A Comparative Study of Risk Appraisal: A New Look at Risk Assessment in Different Countries , 1999 .

[16]  Paul S. Fischbeck,et al.  Automobile risk perceptions and insurance-purchasing decisions in Japan and the United States , 2000 .

[17]  Yong-Jin Cha,et al.  Risk perception in Korea: a comparison with Japan and the United States , 2000 .

[18]  Bernd Rohrmann,et al.  Cross-Cultural Studies on the Perception and Evaluation of Hazards , 2000 .

[19]  Anne B. Koehler,et al.  Prediction Intervals for ARIMA Models , 2001 .

[20]  M. Elliott,et al.  A national survey of stress reactions after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  David G. Myers Do We Fear the Right Things , 2001 .

[22]  M Sivack,et al.  FLYING AND DRIVING AFTER THE SEPTEMBER 11 ATTACKS , 2002 .

[23]  H. K. Kwon,et al.  A Comparative Study about the Traffic Accident Statistics and the Risk Perceptions among South Korea, Japan and the United States , 2002 .

[24]  Virginia Gil-Rivas,et al.  Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11. , 2002, JAMA.

[25]  Lisa Thalji,et al.  Psychological reactions to terrorist attacks: findings from the National Study of Americans' Reactions to September 11. , 2002, JAMA.

[26]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory , 2003 .

[27]  C. Sunstein Terrorism and Probability Neglect , 2003 .

[28]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: Contents , 2003 .

[29]  J. Plant Terrorism and the Railroads: Redefining Security in the Wake of 9/11 , 2004 .

[30]  K. Mccaul,et al.  Perceived Risk and Worry: The Effects of 9/11 on Willingness to Fly1 , 2004 .

[31]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Travel Risks in a Time of Terror: Judgments and Choices , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[32]  G. Gigerenzer Dread Risk, September 11, and Fatal Traffic Accidents , 2004, Psychological science.

[33]  Brian Michael Jenkins Terrorism and the Security of Public Surface Transportation , 2004 .

[34]  W. Waugh Securing Mass Transit: A Challenge for Homeland Security , 2004 .

[35]  Guy Stecklov,et al.  Terror attacks influence driving behavior in Israel. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Harumi Ito,et al.  Assessing the impact of the September 11 terrorist attacks on U.S. airline demand , 2004, Journal of Economics and Business.

[37]  S. Gaines,et al.  Terror threat perception and its consequences in contemporary Britain. , 2005, British journal of psychology.

[38]  Todd Litman,et al.  Terrorism, transit and public safety: Evaluating the risks , 2005 .

[39]  Alejandro López-Rousseau Avoiding the Death Risk of Avoiding a Dread Risk , 2005, Psychological science.

[40]  Daniel H. Simon,et al.  The Impact of 9/11 on Road Fatalities: The Other Lives Lost to Terrorism , 2005 .

[41]  C. Brewin,et al.  Psychological and behavioural reactions to the bombings in London on 7 July 2005: cross sectional survey of a representative sample of Londoners , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[42]  Jumpei Ichinosawa Reputational disaster in Phuket: the secondary impact of the tsunami on inbound tourism , 2006 .

[43]  J. Montalvo Voting after the bombing: Can terrorist attacks change the outcome of democratic elections? , 2006 .

[44]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Out of the Frying Pan into the Fire: Behavioral Reactions to Terrorist Attacks , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[45]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Diffusion of Fear: Modeling Community Response to a Terrorist Strike , 2007 .

[46]  J. Talbott Psychological and behavioural reactions to the bombings in London on 7 July 2005: cross sectional survey of a representative sample of Londoners , 2007 .

[47]  C. Brewin,et al.  Enduring consequences of terrorism: 7-month follow-up survey of reactions to the bombings in London on 7 July 2005 , 2007, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[48]  Yumiko Nara A Cross-Cultural Study on Attitudes toward Risk, Safety and Security , 2008, KES.

[49]  T. Baumert Terrorism, News Flows and Stock Markets , 2009 .

[50]  P. Gordon,et al.  Global business and the terrorist threat , 2009 .

[51]  Floyd W. Rudmin Global business and the terrorist threat , 2010 .

[52]  G. Becker,et al.  Fear and the Response to Terrorism: An Economic Analysis , 2011 .