Machine‐learning‐based prediction methods for path loss and delay spread in air‐to‐ground millimetre‐wave channels

The unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been widely applied in various fields due to their advantages like high mobility and low cost. Reliable communication is the premise to ensure the connectivity between UAV nodes. To provide reasonable references for the design, deployment, and operation of UAV communication systems, the precise prediction of radio channel parameters are required. In this study, the authors propose prediction methods for path loss and delay spread in air-to-ground millimetre-wave channels based on machine learning. Random forest and K-nearest-neighbours are the algorithms employed in the methods. Then, a feature selection scheme is proposed to further improve the prediction accuracy and generalisation performance of the machine-learning-based methods. Generally, machine learning algorithms require massive data for training purpose. However, measuring data is time-consuming and costly, especially when the scenario or frequency changes. Therefore, transfer learning methods are introduced to predict path loss with limited data. The proposed methods for path loss prediction are compared to Okumura-Hata and COST-231 Hata models. The lognormal distribution is the contrast model in delay spread prediction. Based on the data generated by ray-tracing software, the new methods have a smaller root mean square errors than contrast models.

[1]  Cheng-Xiang Wang,et al.  A 2-D Non-Stationary GBSM for Vehicular Visible Light Communication Channels , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[2]  Cheng-Xiang Wang,et al.  Optical Wireless Communication Channel Measurements and Models , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[3]  Jeroen Wigard,et al.  Radio Channel Modeling for UAV Communication Over Cellular Networks , 2017, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[4]  Steven D. Glaser,et al.  A Machine-Learning-Based Connectivity Model for Complex Terrain Large-Scale Low-Power Wireless Deployments , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking.

[5]  Qiang Yang,et al.  A Survey on Transfer Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[6]  S. Tabbane,et al.  A UHF Path Loss Model Using Learning Machine for Heterogeneous Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[7]  Rui Zhang,et al.  Wireless communications with unmanned aerial vehicles: opportunities and challenges , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  Lin Zhang,et al.  Modelling unmanned aerial vehicles base station in ground-to-air cooperative networks , 2017, IET Commun..

[9]  George Dimitrakopoulos,et al.  Statistical modeling of RMS-delay spread under multipath fading conditions in local areas , 2000, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[10]  J. Friedman Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. , 2001 .

[11]  Akram Al-Hourani,et al.  Modeling Cellular-to-UAV Path-Loss for Suburban Environments , 2018, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[12]  M. Salazar-Palma,et al.  A survey of various propagation models for mobile communication , 2003 .

[13]  Xiang-Gen Xia,et al.  Enabling UAV cellular with millimeter-wave communication: potentials and approaches , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[14]  M. Hata,et al.  Empirical formula for propagation loss in land mobile radio services , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[15]  T. A. Wilkinson,et al.  RMS delay spread in indoor LOS environments at 5.2 GHz , 1998 .

[16]  Phuong T. Tran,et al.  Adaptive Energy Harvesting Relaying Protocol for Two-Way Half-Duplex System Network over Rician Fading Channels , 2018, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..