Visual assessment of the similarity between a patient and trial population

BACKGROUND A critical consideration when applying the results of a clinical trial to a particular patient is the degree of similarity of the patient to the trial population. However, similarity assessment rarely is practical in the clinical setting. Here, we explore means to support similarity assessment by clinicians. METHODS A scale chart was developed to represent the distribution of reported clinical and demographic characteristics of clinical trial participant populations. Constructed for an individual patient, the scale chart shows the patient's similarity to the study populations in a graphical manner. A pilot test case was conducted using case vignettes assessed by clinicians. Two pairs of clinical trials were used, each addressing a similar clinical question. Scale charts were manually constructed for each simulated patient. Clinicians were asked to estimate the degree of similarity of each patient to the populations of a pair of trials. Assessors relied on either the scale chart, a summary table (aligning characteristics of 2 trial populations), or original trial reports. Assessment time and between-assessor agreement were compared. Population characteristics considered important by assessors were recorded. RESULTS Six assessors evaluated 6 cases each. Using a visual scale chart, agreement between physicians was higher and the time required for similarity assessment was comparable. CONCLUSION We suggest that further research is warranted to explore visual tools facilitating the choice of the most applicable clinical trial to a specific patient. Automating patient and trial population characteristics extraction is key to support this effort.

[1]  P. Bork,et al.  Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome , 2011, Nature.

[2]  John Bernard Henry,et al.  Comprehensive graphic-based display of clinical pathology laboratory data. , 2003, American journal of clinical pathology.

[3]  Jaak Vilo,et al.  ClustVis: a web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using Principal Component Analysis and heatmap , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  C J McDonald,et al.  Medical Heuristics: The Silent Adjudicators of Clinical Practice , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  Michael J. Hauan,et al.  How much effort is needed to keep up with the literature relevant for primary care? , 2004, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[6]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Off the Radar: Comparative Evaluation of Radial Visualization Solutions for Composite Indicators , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[8]  W. Gaissmaier,et al.  Numbers can be worth a thousand pictures: individual differences in understanding graphical and numerical representations of health-related information. , 2012, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[9]  G Hripcsak,et al.  A Distribution-based Method for Assessing The Differences between Clinical Trial Target Populations and Patient Populations in Electronic Health Records , 2014, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[10]  Richard Colgan,et al.  International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: A 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. , 2011, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[11]  Dionne A. Graham,et al.  A novel approach to gathering and acting on relevant clinical information: SCAMPs. , 2010, Congenital heart disease.

[12]  Angela Fagerlin,et al.  Presenting Research Risks and Benefits to Parents: Does Format Matter? , 2010, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[13]  Richard N. Shiffman,et al.  Model Formulation: Representation of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Conventional and Augmented Decision Tables , 1997, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  V. Herasevich,et al.  Novel Representation of Clinical Information in the ICU , 2010, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[15]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  LifeLines: using visualization to enhance navigation and analysis of patient records , 1998, AMIA.

[16]  P. Ubel,et al.  The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[17]  John B Buse,et al.  Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Presenting risk information to people with diabetes: evaluating effects and preferences for different formats by a web-based randomised controlled trial. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[19]  David T. Bauer,et al.  The design and evaluation of a graphical display for laboratory data , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[20]  J W Williamson,et al.  Health science information management and continuing education of physicians. A survey of U.S. primary care practitioners and their opinion leaders. , 1989, Annals of internal medicine.

[21]  T. Wilt,et al.  Gemfibrozil for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in men with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention Trial Study Group. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.