How to target climate-smart agriculture? Concept and application of the consensus-driven decision support framework “targetCSA”

Planning for agricultural adaptation and mitigation has to lean on informed decision-making processes. Stakeholder involvement, consensus building and the integration of comprehensive and reliable information represent crucial, yet challenging, pillars for successful outcomes. The spatially-explicit multi-criteria decision support framework “targetCSA” presented here aims to aid the targeting of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) at the national level. This framework integrates quantitative, spatially-explicit information such as vulnerability indicators (e.g. soil organic matter, literacy rate and market access) and proxies for CSA practices (e.g. soil fertility improvement, water harvesting and agroforestry) as well as qualitative opinions on these targeting criteria from a broad range of stakeholders. The analytic hierarchy process and a goal optimization approach are utilized to quantify collective, consensus-oriented stakeholder preferences on vulnerability indicators and CSA practices. Spatially-explicit vulnerability and CSA data are aggregated and coupled with stakeholder preferences deriving vulnerability and CSA suitability indices. Based on these indices, relevant regions with the potential to implement CSA practices are identified. “targetCSA” was exemplarily applied in Kenya exploring group-specific and overall consensus-based solutions of stakeholder opinions on vulnerability and CSA under different consensus scenarios. In this example, 32 experts from four stakeholder groups who participated in two surveys were included. The subsequent analyses not only revealed consistently regions with high CSA potential but also highlighted different high potential areas depending on the applied consensus scenario. Thus, this framework allows stakeholders to explore the consequences of scenarios that reflect opinions of the majority and minority or are based on a balance between them. “targetCSA” and the application example contribute valuable insights to the development of policy and planning tools to consensually target and implement CSA.

[1]  Eva-Maria Nordström,et al.  Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a case study in northern Sweden , 2010 .

[2]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  S. Scherr,et al.  From climate-smart agriculture to climate-smart landscapes , 2012, Agriculture & Food Security.

[4]  Alfons Oude Lansink,et al.  A multiple criteria decision making approach to manure management systems in the Netherlands , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Abrar S. Chaudhury,et al.  Participatory adaptation planning and costing. Applications in agricultural adaptation in western Kenya , 2014, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[6]  Rodger Benson Tomlinson,et al.  Spatial uncertainty analysis in coastal land use planning: a case study at Gold Coast, Australia , 2013 .

[7]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[8]  M. Obersteiner,et al.  Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Radhika Dave,et al.  Extreme vulnerability of smallholder farmers to agricultural risks and climate change in Madagascar , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  F. Bousqueta,et al.  Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management : a review , 2004 .

[11]  Valentina Ferretti,et al.  Ecological land suitability analysis through spatial indicators: An application of the Analytic Network Process technique and Ordered Weighted Average approach , 2013 .

[12]  Eduardo Segarra,et al.  Integrated Irrigated Crop-Livestock Systems in Dry Climates , 2007 .

[13]  Keith D. Shepherd,et al.  Targeting conservation agriculture in the context of livelihoods and landscapes , 2014 .

[14]  Greg Husak,et al.  Estimating agricultural production in marginal and food insecure areas in Kenya using very high resolution remotely sensed imagery , 2014 .

[15]  R. Sessa,et al.  Climate-smart agriculture: sourcebook. , 2013 .

[16]  Cheryl A. Palm,et al.  Fertility capability soil classification: a tool to help assess soil quality in the tropics , 2003 .

[17]  B. Kiteme,et al.  Socio-economic atlas of Kenya: Depicting the national population census by county and sub-location , 2016 .

[18]  Antonio Trabucco,et al.  Climate change mitigation: a spatial analysis of global land suitability for Clean Development Mechanism afforestation and reforestation , 2008 .

[19]  Murray McGregor Multiple criteria analysis for agricultural decisions : Developments in Agricultural Economics 5. By C. Romero and T. Rehman. Elsevier, 1989. 257 pp. ISBN 0-444-87408-9. Price not given , 1990 .

[20]  Jacinto González-Pachón,et al.  Inferring consensus weights from pairwise comparison matrices without suitable properties , 2007, Ann. Oper. Res..

[21]  Peter A. Minang,et al.  Are REDD projects pro-poor in their spatial targeting? Evidence from Kenya , 2014 .

[22]  Joan E. Luther,et al.  GIS-Based Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis , 2011 .

[23]  María Isabel Rodríguez-Galiano,et al.  Transitive approximation to pairwise comparison matrices by using interval goal programming , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[24]  Amir Kassam,et al.  Assessing the vulnerability of food crop systems in Africa to climate change , 2007 .

[25]  A. J. Barfoot,et al.  Defining desired genetic gains for rainbow trout breeding objective using analytic hierarchy process. , 2012, Journal of animal science.

[26]  Carlos Romero,et al.  Aggregation of preferences in an environmental economics context: a goal-programming approach , 2002 .

[27]  Ilpo Tammi,et al.  Spatial MCDA in marine planning: Experiences from the Mediterranean and Baltic Seas , 2014 .

[28]  Benjamin L. Preston,et al.  Climate adaptation planning in practice: an evaluation of adaptation plans from three developed nations , 2011 .

[29]  Jacinto González-Pachón,et al.  The design of socially optimal decisions in a consensus scenario , 2011 .

[30]  Ninni Saarinen,et al.  Stakeholder perspectives about proper participation for Regional Forest Programmes in Finland , 2010 .

[31]  T. Fellmann,et al.  The assessment of climate change-related vulnerability in the agricultural sector: reviewing conceptual frameworks. , 2012 .

[32]  Günther Fischer,et al.  Mapping Biophysical Factors that Influence Agricultural Production and Rural Vulnerability , 2007 .

[33]  T. Beuchelt,et al.  Gender, nutrition- and climate-smart food production: Opportunities and trade-offs , 2013, Food Security.

[34]  A. Gore,et al.  Climate change action plan , 2011 .

[35]  Eva-Maria Nordström,et al.  Approaches for Aggregating Preferences in Participatory Forest Planning - An Experimental Study , 2012 .

[36]  Jacinto González-Pachón,et al.  Forest management with multiple criteria and multiple stakeholders: An application to two public forests in Spain , 2009 .

[37]  N. Millar,et al.  Management to mitigate and adapt to climate change , 2011, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[38]  L. Hannah,et al.  Climate‐Smart Landscapes: Opportunities and Challenges for Integrating Adaptation and Mitigation in Tropical Agriculture , 2014 .

[39]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[40]  S. Eriksen,et al.  Gums and resins: The potential for supporting sustainable adaptation in Kenya's drylands , 2011 .

[41]  Joaquín Bosque Sendra,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Multicriteria Spatial Decision-Making: A Review , 2004 .

[42]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[43]  Ernest L. Molua,et al.  Global Climate Change and Vulnerability of African Agriculture: Implications for Resilience and Sustained Productive Capacity. , 2010 .

[44]  Lindsay C. Stringer,et al.  Using Principal Component Analysis for information-rich socio-ecological vulnerability mapping in Southern Africa , 2012 .

[45]  H. Velthuizen,et al.  Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.2) , 2008 .

[46]  A. Challinor,et al.  Climate variability and vulnerability to climate change: a review , 2014, Global change biology.

[47]  Gerald C. Nelson,et al.  West African agriculture and climate change: a comprehensive analysis , 2012 .

[48]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1980 .

[49]  Philip K. Thornton,et al.  Sustainable Intensification: What Is Its Role in Climate Smart Agriculture? , 2014 .

[50]  Kerstin Krellenberg,et al.  Inter- and Transdisciplinary Research for Planning Climate Change Adaptation Responses: The Example of Santiago de Chile , 2014 .

[51]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  Implementing an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in ArcGIS , 2008, Comput. Geosci..

[52]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Common Mistakes in Making Value Trade-Offs , 2002, Oper. Res..

[53]  Eastman J. Ronald,et al.  RASTER PROCEDURES FOR MULTI-CRITERIA/MULTI-OBJECTIVE DECISIONS , 1995 .

[54]  Andrew Nelson,et al.  Agglomeration Index : Towards a New Measure of Urban Concentration , 2010 .

[55]  Carlos Romero,et al.  Multiple Criteria Analysis for Agricultural Decisions , 1989 .

[56]  Hongqi Zhang,et al.  Spatially-explicit sensitivity analysis for land suitability evaluation , 2013 .

[57]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[58]  T. Saaty Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1994 .

[59]  Rick Mueller,et al.  Mapping global cropland and field size , 2015, Global change biology.

[60]  Kwabena Asante,et al.  Estimating least-developed countries’ vulnerability to climate-related extreme events over the next 50 years , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  Johanna Orvokki Mustelin,et al.  Strategies for improving adaptation practice in developing countries , 2014 .

[62]  E. Sills,et al.  Targeting areas for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) projects in Tanzania , 2014 .

[63]  Michele Meroni,et al.  Historical extension of operational NDVI products for livestock insurance in Kenya , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[64]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  Water Resource Vulnerability Characteristics by District’s Population Size in a Changing Climate Using Subjective and Objective Weights , 2014 .

[65]  K. O’Brien,et al.  Vulnerability, poverty and the need for sustainable adaptation measures , 2007 .