BRANCH SUPPORT AND TREE STABILITY
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Bull,et al. An Empirical Test of Bootstrapping as a Method for Assessing Confidence in Phylogenetic Analysis , 1993 .
[2] P. Goloboff. HOMOPLASY AND THE CHOICE AMONG CLADOGRAMS , 1991, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[3] K. Bremer,et al. Morphology and phylogenetic interrelationships of the Asteraceae, Calyceraceae, Campanulaceae, Goodeniaceae, and related families (Asterales) , 1995 .
[4] Jerrold I. Davis. CHARACTER REMOVAL AS A MEANS FOR ASSESSING STABILITY OF CLADES , 1993, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[5] J. Palmer,et al. Phylogenetic Implications of rbcL Sequence Variation in the Asteraceae , 1992 .
[6] A. Kluge,et al. CLADISTICS: WHAT'S IN A WORD? , 1993, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[7] P. Goloboff. ESTIMATING CHARACTER WEIGHTS DURING TREE SEARCH , 1993, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[8] M. Donoghue,et al. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on rbcl sequences , 1992 .
[9] J. Farris. A Successive Approximations Approach to Character Weighting , 1969 .
[10] Daniel P. Faith,et al. COULD A CLADOGRAM THIS SHORT HAVE ARISEN BY CHANCE ALONE?: ON PERMUTATION TESTS FOR CLADISTIC STRUCTURE , 1991 .
[11] K. Bremer. THE LIMITS OF AMINO ACID SEQUENCE DATA IN ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENETIC RECONSTRUCTION , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[12] D. Faith,et al. LENGTH DIFFERENCES AND TOPOLOGY‐DEPENDENT TESTS: A RESPONSE TO KÄLLERSJÖ ET AL. , 1994 .
[13] B. Bremer,et al. Chloroplast DNA restriction site variation and phylogenetic interrelationships of some genera of the Heliantheae sensu lato (Asteraceae) , 1992 .
[14] J. Palmer,et al. A parsimony analysis of the Asteridae sensu lato based on rbcL sequences. , 1993 .
[15] C. Bult,et al. SKEWNESS AND PERMUTATION , 1992, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[16] J. Felsenstein. CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[17] A. Kluge,et al. Regular ArticleCladistics: What's in a Word? , 1993 .
[18] K. Holsinger,et al. PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF CHLOROPLAST DNA RESTRICTION SITE DATA AT HIGHER TAXONOMIC LEVELS: AN EXAMPLE FROM THE ASTERACEAE , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[19] D. Faith. Cladistic permutation tests for monophyly and nonmonophyly , 1991 .
[20] A. Kluge,et al. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology. , 1993, Molecular biology and evolution.
[21] J. Farris. THE RETENTION INDEX AND THE RESCALED CONSISTENCY INDEX , 1989, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[22] E. Conti,et al. Tribal relationships in Onagraceae: implications from rbcL sequence data , 1993 .
[23] J. Carpenter. Choosing Among Multiple Equally Parsimonious Cladograms , 1988, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[24] J. Trueman. RANDOMIZATION CONFOUNDED: A RESPONSE TO CARPENTER , 1993 .
[25] B. Bremer,et al. COMPARATIVE RESTRICTION SITE MAPPING OF CHLOROPLAST DNA IMPLIES NEW PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN RUBIACEAE , 1991 .
[26] J. Farris,et al. Immunological Distance and the Phylogenetic Relationships of the Rana Boylii Species Group , 1982 .
[27] P. Goloboff. Regular ArticleEstimating Character Weights during Tree Search , 1993 .
[28] M. Källersjö,et al. Phylogenetic analysis of the cichorioideae (Asteraceae) with emphasis on the Mutisieae , 1992 .
[29] Cladistic Characters and Cladogram Stability , 1993 .
[30] Michael J Sanderson,et al. CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: THE BOOTSTRAP REVISITED , 1989, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.