MULTI-OBJECTIVE CHANNEL DECISION FOR ADHOC COGNITIVE RADIO NETWORK

Faithfull detection of non-utilized spectrum hole in available channel is a crucial issue for cognitive radio network. Choosing the best available channel for a secondary user transmission includes settling on decision of accessible choices of free frequency spectrum based on multiple objectives. Thus channel judgment can be demonstrated as several objective decision making (MODM) problem. An ultimate goal of this exploration is to define and execute a technique for multiple objective optimizations of multiple alternative of channel decision in Adhoc cognitive radio network. After a coarse review of an articles related to the multiple objective decision making within a process of channel selection, Multiple Objective Optimization on the basis of the Ratio Analysis (MOORA) technique is taken into consideration. Some important objectives values of non-utilized spectrum collected by a fusion center are proposed as objectives for consideration in the decision of alternatives. MOORA method is applied to a matrix of replies of each channel alternatives to channel objectives which results in set ratios. Among the set of obtained dimensionless ratios, all the channel alternatives are ranked in descending order. In MOORA, channel choices with moderate objectives can top in ranking order, which is hardly conceivable with linearly weighted objectives of the different channel by using different decision making technique.

[1]  Sherali Zeadally,et al.  Spectrum Assignment in Cognitive Radio Networks: A Comprehensive Survey , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[2]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  CRAHNs: Cognitive radio ad hoc networks , 2009, Ad Hoc Networks.

[3]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[4]  Enrique Stevens-Navarro,et al.  Performance of MADM algorithms with real spectrum measurements for spectrum decision in cognitive radio networks , 2014, 2014 11th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE).

[5]  Anant Sahai,et al.  Cooperative Sensing among Cognitive Radios , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[6]  Arsany Guirguis,et al.  Cooperation-based Routing in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2016, ArXiv.

[7]  Zhongding Lei,et al.  IEEE 802.22: The first cognitive radio wireless regional area network standard , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  Joseph Mitola,et al.  Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal , 1999, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[9]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[10]  Ananthram Swami,et al.  A Decision-Theoretic Framework for Opportunistic Spectrum Access , 2007, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[11]  Mihaela van der Schaar,et al.  Spectrum Access Games and Strategic Learning in Cognitive Radio Networks for Delay-Critical Applications , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  Srinivasan Keshav,et al.  GUESS: gossiping updates for efficient spectrum sensing , 2006, MobiShare '06.

[13]  Mohammed Oumsis,et al.  Multi-Criteria Vertical Handover Comparison between Wimax and Wifi , 2015, Inf..

[14]  A. Ghasemi,et al.  Collaborative spectrum sensing for opportunistic access in fading environments , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[15]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy , 2006 .

[16]  Rajeshree D. Raut,et al.  Ad-hoc network based smart I-voting system: An application to cognitive radio technology , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC).

[17]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  Game theory for cognitive radio networks: An overview , 2010, Comput. Networks.