PET/CT in the Evaluation of Response to Treatment of Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer with Bevacizumab and Irinotecan

The present approach at our institution for the treatment of patients with colorectal (CRC) cancer and with liver metastases planned for metastasectomy is the neoadjuvant administration of Bevacizumab with Irinotecan based therapy. Metabolic imaging of tumor viability with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), and simultaneous anatomic localization provided by low-dose non-enhanced computed tomography (CT), can be obtained in a combined modality FDG-PET/CT scan. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possible contribution of FDG-PET/CT as a surrogate marker to evaluate treatment response of liver metastases in vivo. This is a retrospective evaluation of 18F-FDG PET and CT findings in the first seven consecutive patients. FDG-PET/CT scans were performed before the start of the neoadjuvant and after four cycles of therapy, just prior to surgery. Results were compared to concurrent contrast-enhanced CT, when required, and pathology. Response to treatment was determined according to RECIST size criteria obtained from data from thin (3–5mm) slice CT, and changes in uptake of 18F-FDG uptake on PET. A total of 20 liver lesions were evaluated in seven patients. Overall, 6/7 patients had favorable response to treatment, and only one had progression of disease. One patient was found to be inoperable at surgery. Biopsy was obtained in 1/4 lesions in this patient, while pathology was unable for the remaining three lesions. As such, pathologic validation of findings was available for 17/20 lesions. Complete response (CR) was evident on FDG-PET in 10/17 (58%) lesions, whereas only 4/17(23%) were deemed CR by CT. Similarly, only 1/17 (6%) lesion appeared stable by FDG-PET criteria, whereas three (18%) were termed stable disease (SD) according to size on CT. FDG-PET findings correlated better than CT with pathology, and were more indicative of pathology. Overall PET/CT correctly predicted necrosis at pathology in 70% vs. 35% by CT. Our results suggest that 18F-FDG PET may be instrumental for predicting the pathologic response to Bevacizumab based therapy.

[1]  Ma Dong,et al.  Bevacizumab plus Irinotecan,Fluorouracil,and Leucovorin for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2006 .

[2]  J. Berlin,et al.  Bevacizumab in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin: an active regimen for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  David W Barker,et al.  Evaluation of liver metastases after radiofrequency ablation: utility of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Gordon C Jayson,et al.  Molecular imaging of antiangiogenic agents. , 2005, The oncologist.

[5]  J. Berlin,et al.  Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  M. Dickler,et al.  Maximizing the potential of bevacizumab in cancer treatment. , 2004, The oncologist.

[7]  Ricky T. Tong,et al.  Direct evidence that the VEGF-specific antibody bevacizumab has antivascular effects in human rectal cancer , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[8]  G. Sledge,et al.  A phase I/II dose-escalation trial of bevacizumab in previously treated metastatic breast cancer. , 2003, Seminars in oncology.

[9]  Seth M Steinberg,et al.  A randomized trial of bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, for metastatic renal cancer. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  F. Kabbinavar,et al.  Phase II, randomized trial comparing bevacizumab plus fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) with FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  L. Ellis,et al.  Development of biologic markers of response and assessment of antiangiogenic activity in a clinical trial of human recombinant endostatin. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: A new paradigm for combination therapy , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[13]  M. Christian,et al.  [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors]. , 2000, Bulletin du cancer.

[14]  A. Padhani,et al.  FDG–PET in the prediction of survival of patients with cancer of the pancreas: a pilot study , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.

[15]  A. Eggermont,et al.  What can we learn from phase II adjuvant trials in melanoma? , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  H Evans,et al.  Early evaluation of tumour metabolic response using [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography:a pilot study following the phase II chemotherapy schedule for temozolomide in recurrent high-grade gliomas , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.

[17]  K. Herholz,et al.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[18]  S. Osman,et al.  Tumor, normal tissue, and plasma pharmacokinetic studies of fluorouracil biomodulation with N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate, folinic acid, and interferon alfa. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  F. Smith,et al.  Pattern of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluro-D-glucose accumulation in liver tumours: primary, metastatic and after chemotherapy. , 1992, Nuclear medicine communications.