Open-loop and closed-loop optokinetic nystagmus in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) and in man.

Horizontal optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) was measured in 3 normal Squirrel monkeys by means of the electromagnetic search coil technique. Binocular and monocular stimulation of each eye to the left and right by moving vertical stripe patterns of 2.37 or 15 degree period were applied at angular velocities of 0.5 to 400 deg/s. After measurement of horizontal OKN under normal conditions, open-loop OKN gain was determined by monocular stimulation of an eyeball immobilized by means of retrobulbar injections of 11 units botulinum toxin (BoTx type A) and compared with the pre-injection data or with monocular stimulation of the other eye, which remained mobile. In normal Squirrel monkeys gain of optokinetic nystagmus reached values between 0.8 and 0.97 at angular velocities below 1.5 deg/s. Gain under these conditions was related to stimulus angular velocities Vs, i.e. Ge = Ve/Vs. A slightly higher gain was found for binocular than for monocular stimulation. No significant differences were found in OKN when monocular stimulation in the naso-temporal and in the temporo-nasal direction was applied. The upper cut-off angular velocity (-3 dB-point) reached values of 180-230 deg/s, significantly above those observed in man under similar stimulus conditions. Monocular optokinetic stimulation of an immobilized eye led to vigorous optokinetic nystagmus and OKAN of the other eye, whereby maximum gain (Gi = Ve/Vr) was found to be between 20 and 30 at lower retinal stimulus velocities (2-5 deg/s). Gain was related to retinal stimulus velocity Vr. Increase in Vr above 10 deg/s led to a decrease in gain with a slope of about 20 dB per decade. Measurement of gain of closed-loop OKN related to retinal stimulus velocity Vr (which was determined by the difference between Vs and Ve) led to a similar dependence of OKN as in closed-loop stimulus conditions. Differences in sensitivity between the temporal and the nasal visual hemifield stimulation evoking horizontal open-loop OKN are described. Directional selectivity appeared in these experiments. Open-loop OKN data from a human subject are reported. With highly attentive horizontal optokinetic gaze nystagmus, Ve depended on the duration of the pursuit phases of OKN. Ve accelerated with the duration of the individual slow phase of OKN and was reset by each backward saccade (of the covered mobile eye). OKN gain was considerably smaller when the subject intentionally pursued as many stripes as possible of the 1.15 degree period stripe pattern (gain related to Vr about 1.5-3).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

[1]  Tadashi Kawasaki,et al.  Role of the nucleus of the optic tract in monkeys in relation to optokinetic nystagmus , 1986, Brain Research.

[2]  H. Collewijn Direction-selective units in the rabbit's nucleus of the optic tract , 1975, Brain Research.

[3]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Retinal input to direction selective cells in the nucleus tractus opticus of the cat , 1975, Brain Research.

[4]  R. Freeman,et al.  Developmental Neurobiology of Vision , 1979, NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series.

[5]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Is the prepositus hypoglossi nucleus the source of another vestibulo-ocular pathway? , 1975, Brain Research.

[6]  J. Kerner Neue Beobachtungen über die in Würtemberg so häufig vorfallenden tödtlichen Vergiftungen durch den Genuß geräucherter Würste , 1820 .

[7]  Dr. Han Collewijn,et al.  The Oculomotor System of the Rabbit and Its Plasticity , 1981, Studies of Brain Function.

[8]  K. Hoffmann Optokinetic Nystagmus and Single-cell Responses in the Nucleus Tractus Opticus After Early Monocular Deprivation in the Cat , 1979 .

[9]  M. Cynader,et al.  Electrophysiology of lateral and dorsal terminal nuclei of the cat accessory optic system. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  J. Simpson The accessory optic system. , 1984, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  D. Robinson,et al.  A METHOD OF MEASURING EYE MOVEMENT USING A SCLERAL SEARCH COIL IN A MAGNETIC FIELD. , 1963, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[12]  Volker Henn,et al.  Gaze stabilization in the primate , 1987 .

[13]  J. T. Weber,et al.  The pretectal complex of the monkey: A reinvestigation of the morphology and retinal terminations , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  O. Grüsser,et al.  The Effect of Monocular Pattern Deprivation and Open-Loop Stimulation on Optokinetic Nystagmus in Squirrel Monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) , 1988 .

[15]  E. Keller,et al.  Neuronal responses to optokinetic stimuli in pontine nuclei of behaving monkey. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  G Curio,et al.  Spatially selective visual attention and generation of eye pursuit movements. Experiments with sigma-movement. , 1982, Human neurobiology.

[17]  K. Hoffmann Visual inputs relevant for the optokinetic nystagmus in mammals. , 1986, Progress in brain research.

[18]  K. Hoffmann Neural Basis for Changes of the Optokinetic Reflex in Animals and Men with Strabismus and Amblyopia , 1988 .

[19]  J. T. Weber Pretectal complex and accessory optic system of primates. , 1985, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.