Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries

Under the Paris Agreement, 195 nations have committed to holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and to strive to limit the increase to 1.5 °C (ref. 1). It is noted that this requires "a balance between anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks of greenhouse gases in the second half of the century"1. This either calls for zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions or a balance between positive and negative emissions (NE)2,3. Roadmaps and socio-economic scenarios compatible with a 2 °C or 1.5 °C goal depend upon NE via bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) to balance remaining GHG emissions4–7. However, large-scale deployment of BECCS would imply significant impacts on many Earth system components besides atmospheric CO2 concentrations8,9. Here we explore the feasibility of NE via BECCS from dedicated plantations and potential trade-offs with planetary boundaries (PBs)10,11 for multiple socio-economic pathways. We show that while large-scale BECCS is intended to lower the pressure on the PB for climate change, it would most likely steer the Earth system closer to the PB for freshwater use and lead to further transgression of the PBs for land-system change, biosphere integrity and biogeochemical flows.Biomass-based negative emissions can help to address the planetary boundary (PB) for climate change. However, side-effects likely include pushing us closer to the PBs for freshwater use and further transgression of the PBs for biosphere integrity, land-system change, and biogeochemical flows.

[1]  J. Eom,et al.  The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview , 2017 .

[2]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Water savings potentials of irrigation systems:: global simulation of processes and linkages , 2015 .

[3]  Jim Watson,et al.  Resolving or managing uncertainties for carbon capture and storage: lessons from historical analogues , 2014 .

[4]  Georgia Destouni,et al.  Comment on “Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet” , 2015, Science.

[5]  C. Müller,et al.  Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance , 2007 .

[6]  T. Beringer,et al.  Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints , 2011 .

[7]  C. Tebaldi,et al.  What would it take to achieve the Paris temperature targets? , 2016 .

[8]  H. Herzog,et al.  Scaling up carbon dioxide capture and storage: From megatons to gigatons , 2011 .

[9]  Martina Flörke,et al.  Domestic and industrial water uses of the past 60 years as a mirror of socio-economic development: A global simulation study , 2013 .

[10]  Joeri Rogelj,et al.  Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal , 2016 .

[11]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions , 2016 .

[12]  Giorgio Ragaglini,et al.  Miscanthus × giganteus nutrient concentrations and uptakes in autumn and winter harvests as influenced by soil texture, irrigation and nitrogen fertilization in the Mediterranean , 2015 .

[13]  Elke Stehfest,et al.  Exploring global changes in nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in agriculture induced by livestock production over the 1900–2050 period , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Christoph Schmitz,et al.  The impact of high-end climate change on agricultural welfare , 2016, Science Advances.

[15]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Betting on negative emissions , 2014 .

[16]  Dieter Gerten,et al.  Trade‐offs between land and water requirements for large‐scale bioenergy production , 2016 .

[17]  W. Barthlott,et al.  A global assessment of endemism and species richness across island and mainland regions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Pavel Kabat,et al.  Accounting for environmental flow requirements in global water assessments , 2013 .

[19]  W. Lucht,et al.  Agricultural green and blue water consumption and its influence on the global water system , 2008 .

[20]  P. Jones,et al.  Updated high‐resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10 Dataset , 2014 .

[21]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  A roadmap for rapid decarbonization , 2017, Science.

[22]  A. Hastings,et al.  Future energy potential of Miscanthus in Europe , 2009 .

[23]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Is extensive terrestrial carbon dioxide removal a ‘green’ form of geoengineering? A global modelling study , 2016 .

[24]  Timothy M. Lenton,et al.  A review of climate geoengineering proposals , 2011 .

[25]  J. Garnier,et al.  50 year trends in nitrogen use efficiency of world cropping systems: the relationship between yield and nitrogen input to cropland , 2014 .

[26]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model , 2003 .

[27]  K. Calvin,et al.  Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century , 2017 .

[28]  P. Ciais,et al.  Negative emissions physically needed to keep global warming below 2 °C , 2015, Nature Communications.

[29]  L. L. Lao,et al.  A global simulation study of ICRF heating in the LHD , 2006 .

[30]  P. Kyle,et al.  Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways , 2017 .

[31]  R. Biggs,et al.  A biodiversity intactness index , 2005, Nature.

[32]  M. Meinshausen,et al.  A new climate dataset for systematic assessments of climate change impacts as a function of global warming , 2012 .

[33]  Xiaoyun Qin,et al.  Switchgrass as an alternate feedstock for power generation: an integrated environmental, energy and economic life-cycle assessment , 2006 .

[34]  J. Amonette,et al.  Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change , 2010, Nature communications.

[35]  Benjamin Leon Bodirsky,et al.  Global Food Demand Scenarios for the 21st Century , 2015, PloS one.

[36]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  How much land‐based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? , 2013, Global change biology.

[37]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[38]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet , 2015, Science.

[39]  G. Luderer,et al.  Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C , 2015 .

[40]  Christoph Schmitz,et al.  Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution , 2014, Nature Communications.

[41]  Benjamin Leon Bodirsky,et al.  Land-use protection for climate change mitigation , 2014 .

[42]  S. Seitzinger,et al.  Assessing planetary and regional nitrogen boundaries related to food security and adverse environmental impacts , 2013 .

[43]  Jessica Strefler,et al.  The value of bioenergy in low stabilization scenarios: an assessment using REMIND-MAgPIE , 2014, Climatic Change.

[44]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation : special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2011 .

[45]  W. Lucht,et al.  Terrestrial vegetation and water balance-hydrological evaluation of a dynamic global vegetation model , 2004 .

[46]  C. Müller,et al.  Virtual water content of temperate cereals and maize: Present and potential future patterns , 2010 .

[47]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Zero emission targets as long-term global goals for climate protection , 2015 .