Investigation of Femtosecond Laser–Enabled Keratoplasty Wound Geometry Using Optical Coherence Tomography

Purpose: To measure the wound geometry after femtosecond laser-enabled keratoplasty (FLEK) using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Design: Prospective nonrandomized clinical study and laboratory study. Participants: Patients who were candidates for penetrating keratoplasty at an academic referral center. Methods: Wound architecture was measured and analyzed by OCT in 8 eyes of 8 consecutive patients who underwent FLEK. Femtosecond laser lamellar cuts were performed on 3 eye bank corneas, and the wound diameters were measured by OCT. Results: Sutures were completely removed on average at 1 month per decade of age after surgery. No cases of wound dehiscence were noted, and graft-host tissue apposition appeared excellent on OCT. The mean spectacle-corrected visual acuity 1 month after suture removal was 20/35, and mean astigmatism was 5.0 diopters by manifest refraction and 8.7 diopters by computerized topography. The measured graft diameter was smaller than the laser setting by 2.5% (P = 0.007). The cut diameters of the eye bank corneas were also slightly smaller than the laser setting. Conclusions: FLEK offers benefits of rapid wound healing and predictable wound geometry. The measured wound geometry agreed well with laser setting other than a small systematic deviation that could be explained by the mechanics of corneal applanation during the laser cut. OCT is a useful tool to measure the actual graft diameter after FLEK.

[1]  R. Steinert,et al.  Comparison of penetrating keratoplasty performed with a femtosecond laser zig-zag incision versus conventional blade trephination. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[2]  Roni M. Shtein,et al.  Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Keratoplasty: Laboratory Studies in Eye Bank Eyes , 2009, Current eye research.

[3]  I. Bahar,et al.  Femtosecond laser versus manual dissection for top hat penetrating keratoplasty , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[4]  I. Bahar,et al.  Corneal wound malapposition after penetrating keratoplasty: an optical coherence tomography study , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[5]  F. Matonti,et al.  Short-term results of penetrating keratoplasty performed with the Femtec femtosecond laser. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  I. Bahar,et al.  Femtosecond laser top hat penetrating keratoplasty: wound burst pressures of incomplete cuts. , 2008, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  J. Mehta,et al.  Outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  F. Price,et al.  Femtosecond laser shaped penetrating keratoplasty: one-year results utilizing a top-hat configuration. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  Matthew Kim,et al.  Results of penetrating keratoplasty performed with a femtosecond laser zigzag incision initial report. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[10]  L. Buratto,et al.  The use of the femtosecond laser in penetrating keratoplasty. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  Roger F Steinert,et al.  "Top hat"-shaped penetrating keratoplasty using the femtosecond laser. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  R. Chuck,et al.  Top Hat Wound Configuration for Penetrating Keratoplasty Using the Femtosecond Laser: A Laboratory Model , 2006, Cornea.

[13]  Robert W. Thompson,et al.  Long-term graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[14]  D. Hodge,et al.  Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty. , 1998, Ophthalmology.