Connecting performance to social structure and pedagogy as a pathway to scaling learning analytics in MOOCs: an exploratory study

This exploratory study focuses on the design and evaluation of teaching analytics that relate social learning structure with performance measures in a massive open online course MOOC prototype environment. Using reflexive analysis of online learning trace data and qualitative performance measures we present an exploratory empirical study that: a rigorously evaluates a novel, multi-dimensional performance construct; b describes differences in small group dynamics and structure; and c draws a connection between learning performance and group structure. Performance is operationalized using a combination of knowledge construction measurement from discussion boards, rigorous analysis of student work products and several indicators of small group identity in the course examined. Interview and observational data are used to develop an approach for deriving and validating a model of the social structure of students in the course using traces of interaction data. The connection between performance and structure is developed at the small group unit of analysis. Implications for MOOC design, scaling MOOC analytics and a vision for developing social sensors in MOOC environments are presented in the discussion and conclusion.

[1]  Alcides Velasquez,et al.  Motivations to participate in online communities , 2010, CHI.

[2]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Beyond being aware , 2009, Inf. Organ..

[3]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Analyzing Leadership Dynamics in Distributed Group Communication , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[4]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Sifting signal from noise: A new perspective on the meaning of tweets about the “big game” , 2016, New Media Soc..

[5]  N. Christakis,et al.  Social Network Sensors for Early Detection of Contagious Outbreaks , 2010, PloS one.

[6]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Talking to strangers: an evaluation of the factors affecting electronic collaboration , 1996, CSCW '96.

[7]  Jimmy Frerejean,et al.  Using process mining to identify models of group decision making in chat data , 2009, CSCL.

[8]  Hans van Buuren,et al.  Determining Sociability, Social Space, and Social Presence in (A)synchronous Collaborative Groups , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[9]  Sylwia Męcfal Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[10]  N. Law,et al.  Productive Multivocality in the Analysis of Group Interactions , 2013 .

[11]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  Educational Data Mining: A Review of the State of the Art , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[12]  Charlotte N. Gunawardena,et al.  Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing , 1997 .

[13]  B. Tuckman DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  A. Pentland,et al.  Computational Social Science , 2009, Science.

[15]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Structures that work: social structure, work structure and coordination ease in geographically distributed teams , 2006, CSCW '06.

[16]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Network analysis of trace data for the support of group work: activity patterns in a completely online course , 2010, GROUP.

[17]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Awareness and teamwork in computer-supported collaborations , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[18]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  Social Dilemma in Knowledge Communication via Shared Databases , 2005 .

[19]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[20]  Heinz Ulrich Hoppe,et al.  Computer supported moderation of e-discussions: the ARGUNAUT approach , 2007, CSCL.

[21]  Edoardo M. Airoldi,et al.  Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels , 2007, NIPS.

[22]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Learning analytics in CSCL with a focus on assessment: an exploratory study of activity theory-informed cluster analysis , 2014, LAK.

[23]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Learning analytics at “small” scale , 2015 .

[24]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Completely online group formation and development: small groups as socio-technical systems , 2011, Inf. Technol. People.

[25]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[26]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge (Acting with Technology) , 2006 .

[27]  Paul Dourish,et al.  What we talk about when we talk about context , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[28]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  I Know I Can, But Can We? , 2007 .

[29]  Marcelo Milrad,et al.  Using Construction Kits, Modeling Tools, System Dynamics Simulations to Support Collaborative Discovery Learning , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[30]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in wikipedia: quality through coordination , 2008, CSCW.

[31]  H. Tajfel Social identity and intergroup behaviour , 1974 .

[32]  Steven Lonn,et al.  Issues, challenges, and lessons learned when scaling up a learning analytics intervention , 2013, LAK '13.

[33]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Group Learning Assessment: Developing a Theory-Informed Analytics , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[34]  C. Gersick Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[35]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[36]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Brewing up citizen engagement: the coffee party on facebook , 2011, C&T.

[37]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Changes in use and perception of facebook , 2008, CSCW.

[38]  James D. Klein,et al.  Type of Positive Interdependence and Affiliation Motive in an Asynchronous, Collaborative Learning Environment , 2006 .

[39]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[40]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Social Ability in Online Groups: Representing the Quality of Interactions in Social Computing Environments , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering.

[41]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  “ Turn on , Tune in , Drop out ” : Anticipating student dropouts in Massive Open Online Courses , 2013 .

[42]  Nicolas Michinov,et al.  Social identity, group processes and performance in synchronous computer-mediated communication , 2004 .

[43]  Tom Gross,et al.  User-Centered Awareness in Computer-Supported Cooperative Work-Systems: Structured Embedding of Findings from Social Sciences , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[44]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Free/Libre open-source software development: What we know and what we do not know , 2012, CSUR.

[45]  S. Goggins,et al.  Connecting Theory to Social Technology Platforms , 2014 .

[46]  Amy E. Randel,et al.  Understanding Group Efficacy , 2000 .

[47]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[48]  Murat Perit Çakir,et al.  How online small groups create and use mathematical objects to do collaborative problem solving , 2007, CSCL.

[49]  Scott D. Johnson,et al.  Team development and group processes of virtual learning teams , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[50]  James Irvine,et al.  Nodobo: Mobile Phone as a Software Sensor for Social Network Research , 2011, 2011 IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[51]  Vive S. Kumar,et al.  Assessing process in CSCL: An ontological approach , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[52]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  My Life as a Night Elf Priest: An Anthropological Account of World of Warcraft: Excerpts , 2010, First Monday.

[53]  Tanmay Sinha,et al.  Together we stand, Together we fall, Together we win: Dynamic team formation in massive open online courses , 2014, The Fifth International Conference on the Applications of Digital Information and Web Technologies (ICADIWT 2014).

[54]  Fred G. Martin,et al.  Will massive open online courses change how we teach? , 2012, CACM.

[55]  D. Newman,et al.  A Content Analysis Method to Measure Critical Thinking in Face-to-Face and Computer Supported Group Learning , 1995 .

[56]  Rose M. Marra,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Online Discussion Participation Protocols , 2005 .

[57]  Kelly Blincoe,et al.  Creating a model of the dynamics of socio-technical groups , 2013, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[58]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Measuring Group Efficacy in Virtual Teams , 2006 .

[59]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A face(book) in the crowd: social Searching vs. social browsing , 2006, CSCW '06.

[60]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Designing Socio-Technical Systems to Support Guided "Discovery-Based" Learning in Students: The Case of the Globaloria Game Design Initiative , 2013, IWTA@LAK.

[61]  Franco Zambonelli,et al.  Social sensors and pervasive services: Approaches and perspectives , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops).

[62]  Rita Cadima,et al.  Promoting social network awareness: A social network monitoring system , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[63]  Barry D. Davidson,et al.  Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[64]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The social structure of free and open source software development , 2005, First Monday.

[65]  Ravikiran Vatrapu,et al.  Towards Teaching Analytics: Repertory Grids for Formative Assessment (RGFA) , 2013, CSCL.

[66]  Nobuko Fujita,et al.  Scholarship at UWindsor Scholarship at UWindsor Towards Visual Analytics for Teachers’ Dynamic Diagnostic Towards Visual Analytics for Teachers’ Dynamic Diagnostic Pedagogical Decision-Making Pedagogical Decision-Making , 2011 .

[67]  L. Terveen,et al.  Becoming Wikipedian : Transformation of Participation in a Collaborative Online Encyclopedia , 2009 .

[68]  Estelle Michinov,et al.  Face-to-face contact at the midpoint of an online collaboration: Its impact on the patterns of participation, interaction, affect, and behavior over time , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[69]  Nate Silver,et al.  The signal and the noise : why so many predictions fail but some don't , 2012 .

[70]  Tanmay Sinha Supporting MOOC Instruction with Social Network Analysis , 2014, ArXiv.

[71]  John Yen,et al.  Seeking the trustworthy tweet: Can microblogged data fit the information needs of disaster response and humanitarian relief organizations , 2011, ISCRAM.

[72]  J. McGrath Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[73]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  The Study of Groups: Past, Present, and Future , 2000 .

[74]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[75]  David Lazer,et al.  Network Theory and Small Groups , 2004 .

[76]  Estelle Michinov,et al.  Identifying a transition period at the midpoint of an online collaborative activity: a study among adult learners , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[77]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Initial Validation of Listening Behavior Typologies for Online Discussions Using Microanalytic Case Studies , 2012, ICLS.

[78]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Group informatics: A methodological approach and ontology for sociotechnical group research , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[79]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Social Intelligence in Completely Online Groups - Toward Social Prosthetics from Log Data Analysis and Transformation , 2010, 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing.

[80]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Validity Issues in the Use of Social Network Analysis with Digital Trace Data , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[81]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  C OLLABORATION T HROUGH O PEN S UPERPOSITION : A T HEORY OF THE O PEN S OURCE W AY 1 , 2016 .

[82]  Sandra Ristori,et al.  Bioreducible Liposomes for Gene Delivery: From the Formulation to the Mechanism of Action , 2010, PloS one.

[83]  Rose M. Marra,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion forums: A comparative analysis of protocols , 2004 .

[84]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[85]  James A. Holstein,et al.  Qualitative Interviewing and Grounded Theory Analysis , 2003 .

[86]  J. McGrath Small group research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye to the future. , 1997 .

[87]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Efficacy in Technology-Mediated Distributed Teams , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[88]  Iris K. Howley,et al.  Linguistic Analysis Methods for Studying Small Groups , 2013 .

[89]  John Riedl,et al.  Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia , 2007, GROUP.

[90]  Chris Amelung Using Social Context and E-Learner Identity as a Framework for an E-Learning Notification System , 2007 .

[91]  Oliver Brdiczka,et al.  Predicting shoppers' interest from social interactions using sociometric sensors , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[92]  H. Tajfel Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[93]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005 , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[94]  Malcolm S. Knowles,et al.  Introduction to group dynamics , 1959 .

[95]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism , 1979 .

[96]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Network Analytic Techniques for Online Chat , 2013 .

[97]  Kon Shing Kenneth Chung,et al.  Modelling learning & performance: a social networks perspective , 2012, LAK.

[98]  Carlos Caldeira,et al.  Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge (Acting with Technology) , 2006 .

[99]  Ryan S. Baker,et al.  The State of Educational Data Mining in 2009: A Review and Future Visions. , 2009, EDM 2009.