Impedance changes in chronically implanted and stimulated cochlear implant electrodes

Abstract Objectives Electrode impedance increases following implantation and undergoes transitory reduction with onset of electrical stimulation. The studies in this paper measured the changes in access resistance and polarization impedance in vivo before and following electrical stimulation, and recorded the time course of these changes. Design Impedance measures recorded in (a) four cats following 6 months of cochlear implant use, and (b) three cochlear implant recipients with 1.5–5 years cochlear implant experience. Results Both the experimental and clinical data exhibited a reduction in electrode impedance, 20 and 5% respectively, within 15–30 minutes of stimulation onset. The majority of these changes occurred through reduction in polarization impedance. Cessation of stimulation was followed by an equivalent rise in impedance measures within 6–12 hours. Conclusions Stimulus-induced reductions in impedance exhibit a rapid onset and are evident in both chronic in vivo models tested, even several years after implantation. Given the impedance changes were dominated by the polarization component, these findings suggest that the electrical stimulation altered the electrode surface rather than the bulk tissue and fluid in the cochlea.

[1]  P A Busby,et al.  Electrode impedance in adults and children using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system , 2002, Cochlear implants international.

[2]  G M Clark,et al.  Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. , 1998, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[3]  J. Aran,et al.  Electrical and physiological changes during short-term and chronic electrical stimulation of the normal cochlea , 1997, Hearing Research.

[4]  N Marangos,et al.  COCHLEAR IMPLANTS , 1976, The Lancet.

[5]  R. Cowan,et al.  Effects of steroids and lubricants on electrical impedance and tissue response following cochlear implantation , 2007, Cochlear implants international.

[6]  Robert K. Shepherd,et al.  Does cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation affect residual hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons? , 2007, Hearing Research.

[7]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  The Long-Term Effects of Modified Electrode Surfaces and Intracochlear Corticosteroids on Postoperative Impedances in Cochlear Implant Patients , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[8]  G. M. Clark,et al.  Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II deafened kittens , 1994, Hearing Research.

[9]  R. Shepherd,et al.  Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study , 1997, Hearing Research.

[10]  Michael Tykocinski,et al.  Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve using high surface area (HiQ) platinum electrodes , 2001, Hearing Research.

[11]  James D. Weiland,et al.  Chronic neural stimulation with thin-film, iridium oxide electrodes , 2000, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng..

[12]  Peter Seligman,et al.  Electrical stimulation causes rapid changes in electrode impedance of cell-covered electrodes , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[13]  K. Plant,et al.  Speech Perception as a Function of Electrical Stimulation Rate: Using the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant System , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[14]  Anthony M. Dymond,et al.  Characteristics of the Metal-Tissue Interface of Stimulation Electrodes , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Michael Tykocinski,et al.  Threshold, Comfortable Level and Impedance Changes as a Function of Electrode-Modiolar Distance , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[16]  N. Cohen,et al.  Cochlear Implants , 2000 .

[17]  D. Irvine,et al.  Cochlear implant use following neonatal deafness influences the cochleotopic organization of the primary auditory cortex in cats , 2009, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  Michael Tykocinski,et al.  Measurement and Analysis of Access Resistance and Polarization Impedance in Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2005, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[19]  R.V. Shannon,et al.  A model of safe levels for electrical stimulation , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.