Exposure to successful women: Antidote to sex discrimination in applicant screening decisions?

Abstract This research is designed to examine the proposition that exposure to the successes of women in traditionally male occupations will mitigate against subsequent sex bias in selection decisions. Prior to making initial screening decisions about a male or female applicant for a traditionally male job, i.e., finance manager trainee, 147 college students read an editorial documenting the successful performance of an individual woman or a group of women employed in a nontraditional job that either was or was not related to the job about which the personnel recommendations were to be made. A neutral information group read an editorial unrelated to women or work. As predicted, the discrepant ratings of male and female applicants in the neutral baseline condition were significantly reduced only when the information presented concerned a group of women and there also was a direct connection between the occupation in which they were successful and the occupation for which the screening decision was being made. Additional analyses supported the idea that this effect was due to the lessening of the stereotypie attributes used to characterize the female applicants. These results suggest that although exposure to successful women in heretofore male dominated occupations can reduce sex bias in personnel selection decisions, the conditions under which this is likely to occur are very limited. The implications of these results, both theoretical and practical, are discussed.

[1]  M. Taylor,et al.  Sex Discrimination Against Women in Initial Placement Decisions: A Laboratory Investigation , 1981 .

[2]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. , 1979 .

[3]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[4]  W. Clay Hamner,et al.  Race and sex as determinants of ratings by potential employers in a simulated work-sampling task. , 1974 .

[5]  Stephen L. Cohen,et al.  Subtle effects of sex role stereotypes on recruiters' hiring decisions. , 1975 .

[6]  J. Crocker,et al.  Cognitive Processes in the Revision of Stereotypic Beliefs , 1983 .

[7]  D. Broverman,et al.  Sex‐Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal , 1972 .

[8]  Thomas F. Cash,et al.  Sexism and beautyism in personnel consultant decision making. , 1977 .

[9]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  The impact of situational factors on personnel decisions concerning women: Varying the sex composition of the applicant pool , 1980 .

[10]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles , 1984 .

[11]  V. E. Schein The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. , 1973, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  D. Katz THE FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF ATTITUDES , 1960 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[14]  M. Heilman Information as a deterrent against sex discrimination: The effects of applicant sex and information type on preliminary employment decisions☆ , 1984 .

[15]  W. J. Bigoness,et al.  Effect of applicant's sex, race, and performance on employers' performance ratings: Some additional findings. , 1976 .

[16]  R. L. Dipboye,et al.  Reactions of College Recruiters to Interviewee Sex and Self-Presentation Style. , 1977 .

[17]  V. E. Schein Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. , 1975, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  D. Ilgen,et al.  A theoretical approach to sex discrimination in traditionally masculine occupations , 1975 .

[19]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  Being attractive, advantage or disadvantage? Performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex, and job type. , 1985 .