The angular gyrus and visuospatial attention in decision-making under risk

Recent neuroimaging studies on decision-making under risk indicate that the angular gyrus (AG) is sensitive to the probability and variance of outcomes during choice. A separate body of research has established the AG as a key area in visual attention. The current study used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in healthy volunteers to test whether the causal contribution of the AG to decision-making is independent of or linked to the guidance of visuospatial attention. A within-subject design compared decision making on a laboratory gambling task under three conditions: following rTMS to the AG, following rTMS to the premotor cortex (PMC, as an active control condition) and without TMS. The task presented two different trial types, 'visual' and 'auditory' trials, which entailed a high versus minimal demand for visuospatial attention, respectively. Our results showed a systematic effect of rTMS to the AG upon decision-making behavior in visual trials. Without TMS and following rTMS to the control region, decision latencies reflected the odds of winning; this relationship was disrupted by rTMS to the AG. In contrast, no significant effects of rTMS to the AG (or to the PMC) upon choice behavior in auditory trials were found. Thus, rTMS to the AG affected decision-making only in the task condition requiring visuospatial attention. The current findings suggest that the AG contributes to decision-making by guiding attention to relevant information about reward and punishment in the visual environment.

[1]  Kaustubh Supekar,et al.  Dissociable connectivity within human angular gyrus and intraparietal sulcus: evidence from functional and structural connectivity. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Sara Torriero,et al.  rTMS evidence of different delay and decision processes in a fronto-parietal neuronal network activated during spatial working memory , 2005, NeuroImage.

[3]  Parashkev Nachev,et al.  Space and the parietal cortex , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a neurochromometrics of mind. , 2003 .

[5]  A. Rangel,et al.  Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[6]  Patryk A. Laurent,et al.  Value-driven attentional capture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Martin Eimer,et al.  TMS of the right angular gyrus modulates priming of pop-out in visual search: combined TMS-ERP evidence. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Colin Camerer,et al.  A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  P. Manganotti,et al.  Long Lasting Modulation of Cortical Oscillations after Continuous Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  C. H. Läppchen,et al.  Differential impact of continuous theta‐burst stimulation over left and right DLPFC on planning , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[11]  R. Dolan,et al.  The Known Unknowns: Neural Representation of Second-Order Uncertainty, and Ambiguity , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Reward Changes Salience in Human Vision via the Anterior Cingulate , 2022 .

[13]  Luke Clark,et al.  What are the Odds? The Neural Correlates of Active Choice during Gambling , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[14]  Thomas Kammer,et al.  Mechanisms and Applications of Theta-burst rTMS on the Human Motor Cortex , 2009, Brain Topography.

[15]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  A Parcellation Scheme for Human Left Lateral Parietal Cortex , 2010, Neuron.

[16]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Rewards teach visual selective attention , 2013, Vision Research.

[17]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[18]  Christopher K. Kovach,et al.  Two systems drive attention to rewards , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[19]  M. Rushworth,et al.  TMS in the parietal cortex: Updating representations for attention and action , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Neuroanatomical Dissections of Unilateral Visual Neglect Symptoms: ALE Meta-Analysis of Lesion-Symptom Mapping , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[21]  Etienne Olivier,et al.  Salience Representation in the Parietal and Frontal Cortex , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Jin Fan,et al.  Common and distinct networks underlying reward valence and processing stages: A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[23]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[24]  T. Robbins,et al.  Risk-Sensitive Decision-Making in Patients with Posterior Parietal and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Injury , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Luke Clark,et al.  Place your bets: psychophysiological correlates of decision-making under risk , 2011, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[26]  Christopher S. Monk,et al.  Choice selection and reward anticipation: an fMRI study , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Inferior parietal lobule supports decision making under uncertainty in humans. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  The human inferior parietal cortex: Cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[29]  Matthew F. S. Rushworth,et al.  The Mental Number Line and the Human Angular Gyrus , 2001, NeuroImage.

[30]  Sven Bestmann,et al.  Concurrent TMS–fMRI reveals dynamic interhemispheric influences of the right parietal cortex during exogenously cued visuospatial attention , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[31]  Peter N. C. Mohr,et al.  Neural Processing of Risk , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  A. Rangel,et al.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. , 2010, Nature neuroscience.

[33]  Marco Davare,et al.  Causal Connectivity between the Human Anterior Intraparietal Area and Premotor Cortex during Grasp , 2010, Current Biology.

[34]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Neural Representation of Task Difficulty and Decision Making during Perceptual Categorization: A Timing Diagram , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Friedrich G. Woermann,et al.  Neural correlates of decision making with explicit information about probabilities and incentives in elderly healthy subjects , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  Ralph Weidner,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Attentional Reorienting in Three-Dimensional Space , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Tractography-Based Parcellation of the Human Parietal Cortex and Comparison with Human and Macaque Resting-State Functional Connectivity , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Gregory S. Berns,et al.  Nonlinear neurobiological probability weighting functions for aversive outcomes , 2008, NeuroImage.

[39]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  The differential involvement of inferior parietal lobule in number comparison: a rTMS study , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  R. Ivry,et al.  Dissociating the Role of Prefrontal and Premotor Cortices in Controlling Inhibitory Mechanisms during Motor Preparation , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Deconstructing risk: Separable encoding of variance and skewness in the brain , 2011, NeuroImage.