New Modes of Governance and the Participatory Myth

One of the most common arguments about ‘new governance’ is that it is characterised by heterarchy rather than by hierarchy, creating horizontal modes of governance among a multitude of actors – public and private – involving all relevant stakeholders. Often implicitly and sometimes explicitly, this argument is linked with a normative democratic claim that praises the particular participatory features of ‘new governance’ as compared to ‘old governance’. Using as a case study European occupational health and safety policy, characterised by a shift from ‘old’ to ‘new governance’ since the 1990s, this article warns us that one should be very reluctant in making normative claims on new governance. The analysis of new governance modes such as comitology, agency networking, and social dialogue in this field shows that more horizontal and heterarchical governance does not mean automatically more participatory governance in terms of involving civil society actors and all stakeholders.

[1]  Johan P. Olsen.  Gary Marks, Fritz W. Scharpf, Philippe C. Schmitter and Wolfgang Streeck, Governance in the European Union . London, Thousand Oaks, CA. New Dehli: Sage, 1996, x and 182. £12.95 (paperback). , 1996, Journal of Public Policy.

[2]  Stijn Smismans.  EU Employment Policy: Decentralisation or Centralisation through the Open Method of Coordination? , 2004 .

[3]  K. Lenaerts,et al.  Towards a Legal Framework for Executive Rule-Making in the EU? The Contribution of the New Comitology Decision , 2000, Common Market Law Review.

[4]  G. Marks,et al.  Governance in the European Union , 1996 .

[5]  S. Deakin,et al.  Social rights and market forces : is the open coordination of employment and social policies the future of social Europe? , 2005 .

[6]  European Union Environment Policy and New Forms of Governance , 2001 .

[7]  E. Léonard.  Industrial Relations and the Regulation of Employment in Europe , 2001 .

[8]  D. Kerwer,et al.  Theorising the New Modes of European Union Governance , 2002 .

[9]  C. Joerges,et al.  From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalisation of Comitology , 1997 .

[10]  A. Héritier,et al.  Legislate or delegate? Bargaining over implementation and legislative authority in the EU , 2007 .

[11]  A. Héritier.  Common Goods: Reinventing European and International Governance , 2002 .

[12]  R. Vaubel.  Rezension zu: Majone, Giandomenico: Regulating Europe. London, 1996 , 1997 .

[13]  D. Curtin.  Holding (Quasi-)Autonomous EU Administrative Actors to Public Account , 2007 .

[14]  A. Héritier,et al.  New Modes of Governance in Europe: Policy Making without Legislating? IHS Political Science Series: 2002, No. 81 , 2002 .

[15]  Gregor Schusterschitz,et al.  The Comitology Reform of 2006 Increasing the Powers of the European Parliament Without Changing the Treaties , 2007, European Constitutional Law Review.

[16]  Kenneth A. Armstrong.  Inclusive Governance? Civil Society and the Open Method of Co-ordination , 2006 .

[17]  J Scott,et al.  Law and New EnvironmentalGovernance in the European Union , 2006 .

[18]  Jeff Kenner.  The EC Employment Title and the 'Third Way': Making Soft Law Work? , 1999, International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations.

[19]  W. Lorenz.  Governance and Civil Society in the European Union; vol. 1: Normative Perspectives Governance and Civil Society in the European Union; vol. 2: Exploring Policy Issues , 2007 .

[20]  Joanne Scott,et al.  Mind the Gap: Law and New Approaches to Governance in the European Union , 2002 .

[21]  Participation in the Open Method of Co-ordination: The Cases of Employment and Social Inclusion , 2005 .

[22]  Stijn Smismans.  European Civil Society: Shaped by Discourses and Institutional Interests , 2003 .

[23]  Stijn Smismans.  Civil society and legitimate European governance , 2006 .

[24]  Paul Marginson,et al.  European Collective Bargaining: A Virtual Prospect?† , 1998 .

[25]  Bernd-Otto Kuper.  The Green and White Papers of the European Union: the Apparent Goal of Reduced Social Benefits , 1994 .

[26]  Charles Sabel,et al.  Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the EU , 2008 .

[27]  M. Ivimey.  Annual report , 1958, IRE Transactions on Engineering Writing and Speech.

[28]  Paj Syrpis.  Book Review of 'Law, Legitimacy and European Governance: Functional Participation in Social Regulation': by Stijn Smismans [Oxford: OUP 2004] , 2005 .

[29]  W. Streeck.  Neo‐Voluntarism: A New European Social Policy Regime? , 1995 .

[30]  D. R. Keleman.  The Politics of 'Eurocratic' Structure and the New European Agencies , 2002 .

[31]  Kenneth A. Armstrong,et al.  Rediscovering Civil Society: The European Union and the White Paper on Governance , 2002 .

[32]  A. Héritier,et al.  The Shadow of Hierarchy and New Modes of Governance , 2008, Journal of Public Policy.

[33]  Pieter Bouwen.  Competing for consultation: Civil society and conflict between the European Commission and the European Parliament , 2007 .

[34]  Stijn Smismans.  Functional Participation in EU Delegated Regulation: Lessons from the United States at the EU's "Constitutional Moment" , 2005 .

[35]  Joanne Scott,et al.  Law and new governance in the EU and the US , 2006 .

[36]  D. Hodson,et al.  The Open Method as a New Mode of Governance: The Case of Soft Economic Policy Co-ordination , 2001 .

[37]  V. Eichener.  Social Dumping or Innovative Regulation?Processes and Outcomes of European Decision-Making in the Sector of Health and Safety at Work Harmonization , 1992 .

[38]  Stijn Smismans.  Towards a new community strategy on health and safety at work? Caught in the institutional web of soft procedures , 2003 .

[39]  C. D. L. Porte,et al.  The OMC - a deliberative-democratic mode of governance? The cases of employment and pensions 1 , 2004 .

[40]  Book Review: European Union Environment Policy and New Forms of Governance, Edited by Hubert Heinelt, Tanja Malek Randall Smith and Annette E Toller , 2002 .

[41]  Stijn Smismans.  The European Social Dialogue in the Shadow of Hierarchy , 2008, Journal of Public Policy.