Classification of normal colorectal mucosa and adenocarcinoma by morphometry

Semi‐automatic image analysis was used to make a morphometrical assessment of 15 nuclear and cellular variables in normal (n=20) and malignant (n=30) colorectal epithelium. Principal components analysis on the matrix of correlations between variables identified four main sources of variation within the dataset. These were, in decreasing order of importance: (1) nuclear size, nuclear cytoplasmic ratio and nuclear position within the cell; (2) the variability of nuclear size; (3) nuclear elongation and polarity; (4) nuclear shape and its variation. Discriminant analysis was conducted between histologi‐cally normal mucosa (n=10) and adenocarcinoma in ulcerative colitis (n=20). Using stepwise variable selection, the mean nuclear cytoplasmic ratio (normal, mean 20.4 (s.d. ± 2.0); tumour, mean 39.7 (s.d. ± 7.0)) and the coefficient of variation of nucleus to cell apex distance (normal, mean 19.2 (s.d ± 7.5); tumour, mean 47.8 (s.d. ± 9.1)) were chosen as discriminating features. They were used to derive a discriminant function which gave perfect discriminating between the two groups. Scatter plots of these two variables confirmed complete separation of normal mucosa from adenocarcinoma and provided a simple method of applying the discriminant function. Discriminatory performance did not deteriorate when the function was applied to further normals (n=10) and adenocarcinoma (n=10). This study highlights the descriptive differences between normal and malignant colorectal epithelium and shows that case allocation may be made to these two lesion categories using a morphometrically‐derived classification rule.

[1]  P. Hamilton,et al.  Morphometrical analysis in ulcerative colitis with dysplasia and carcinoma , 1987, Histopathology.

[2]  D. Allen,et al.  Misplaced epithelium in ulcerative colitis and Crohns disease of the colon and its relationship to malignant mucosal changes , 1986, Histopathology.

[3]  L. Jarvis,et al.  Morphometric analysis of gastric dysplasia , 1985, The Journal of pathology.

[4]  E. Ooms,et al.  The reproducibility of a quantitative grading system of bladder tumours , 1985, Histopathology.

[5]  E. Faragher,et al.  Nuclear morphometry of epitheliosis and intraduct carcinoma of the breast , 1985, Histopathology.

[6]  E. Skaarland Morphometric analysis of nuclei in epithelial structures from normal and neoplastic endometrium: a study using the Isaacs cell sampler and Endoscann instruments. , 1985, Journal of clinical pathology.

[7]  N. Smeeton,et al.  Assessment of dysplasia in colorectal adenomas: an observer variation and morphometric study. , 1985, Journal of clinical pathology.

[8]  D. Allen,et al.  Large bowel mucosal dysplasia and carcinoma in ulcerative colitis. , 1985, Journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  D. Allen,et al.  An immunoperoxidase study of epithelial marker antigens in ulcerative colitis with dysplasia and carcinoma. , 1985, Journal of clinical pathology.

[10]  J. Baak,et al.  Borderline or malignant ovarian tumour? A case report of decision making with morphometry. , 1984, Journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  J. Baak,et al.  Computer-aided application of quantitative microscopy in diagnostic pathology. , 1982, Pathology annual.

[12]  J. Baak,et al.  Quantitative, microscopical, computer‐aided diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma in individual patients , 1981, Histopathology.

[13]  J. Baak,et al.  Quantitation of borderline and malignant mucinous ovarian tumours , 1981, Histopathology.

[14]  M. Goto,et al.  Nuclear ultrastructure in carcinoma, adenoma, Peutz-Jeghers polyp and dysplasia of the large bowel: a morphometric analysis. , 1981, Gan.

[15]  J. Baak,et al.  Discrimination of hyperplasia and carcinoma of the endometrium by quantitative microscopy–a feasibility study , 1981, Histopathology.

[16]  M. Boon,et al.  Planimetric studies on fine needle aspirates from follicular adenoma and follicular carcinoma of the thyroid. , 1980, Acta cytologica.

[17]  E. Sato,et al.  Ultramorphometry of the nucleus of human rectal cancer compared with normal mucosal gland. , 1974, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[18]  J. Underwood A Morphometric Analysis of Human Breast Carcinoma , 1972, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  J. Reagan,et al.  Nuclear size and nuclear: Cytoplasmic ratio in the delineation of atypical hyperplasia of the uterine cervix , 1956, Cancer.

[20]  W. Emrich WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE TUMOR CELL NUCLEUS , 1936 .