Worldwide evaluation of a defibrillation lead with a small geometric electrode surface for high-impedance pacing.

[1]  D. Zenker,et al.  1‐Year Performance of a Defibrillation Lead with a Small Electrode Surface for High Impedance Pacing: A Randomized, Controlled Study , 2002, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[2]  A. Moritz,et al.  Extension of Generator Longevity by Use of High Impedance Ventricular Leads , 2001, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[3]  S. Pinski,et al.  Permanent Pacing via Implantable Defibrillators , 2000, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[4]  D. Casavant,et al.  Stable Electrical Performance of High Efficiency Pacing Leads Having Small Surface, Steroid‐Eluting Pacing Electrodes , 1999, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[5]  M. Marzegalli,et al.  High Impedance Low Energy Pacing Leads: Long‐Term Results With a Very Small Surface Area Steroid‐Eluting Lead Compared to Three Conventional Electrodes , 1999, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[6]  K. Ellenbogen,et al.  Steroid Eluting High Impedance Pacing Leads Decrease Short and Long‐Term Current Drain: Results from a Multicenter Clinical Trial. , 1999, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[7]  A. Kadish,et al.  Detection of Ventricular Fibrillation by Transvenous Defibrillating Leads: , 1998, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[8]  P. Hoff,et al.  Clinical Performance of Steroid‐Eluting Pacing Leads with 1.2‐mm2 Electrodes , 1997, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[9]  R. Page,et al.  Initial experience with a high-impedance tined endocardial pacemaker lead: evidence for increased lead failure. , 1997, American heart journal.

[10]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .