Ultrahigh-Field 7-T Magnetic Resonance Carotid Vessel Wall Imaging: Initial Experience in Comparison With 3-T Field Strength

ObjectivesMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the vessel wall enables determination of luminal area, vessel wall thickness, and atherosclerotic plaque characteristics. For clinical application, high spatial resolution, derived from optimal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), is paramount. Vessel wall MRI is expected to benefit from higher magnetic field strength. Therefore, the purposes of the present study were to develop an ultrahigh-field 7-T MRI hardware and protocols for vessel wall imaging of the carotid artery and to compare quantitative parameters of vessel wall morphology and image quality between 3-T and 7-T MRI. Material and MethodsEighteen volunteers (11 men and 7 women; mean [SD] age, 29 [7] years) underwent MRI examinations at 7 T (using a custom-built surface transmit/receive coil of 15-cm diameter) and at 3 T (using a commercial phased-array coil with 2 flexible oval elements, 14 × 17 cm each). Magnetic resonance imaging of the left common carotid artery vessel wall was performed at 7 T with identical in-plane resolution as that of 3-T MRI (0.46 × 0.46 mm2), providing transverse T1- and T2-weighted images. Blinded analysis of morphologic measurements (luminal area and vessel wall area), SNR for vessel wall (SNRVW), and the CNR between the lumen and the vessel wall were compared between 7 and 3 T. ResultsMorphologic carotid vessel wall measurements were comparable between 7 and 3 T for both T1-weighted images (luminal area: intraclass correlation [ICC], 0.81 and vessel wall area: ICC, 0.84) and T2-weighted images (luminal area: ICC, 0.97 and vessel wall area: ICC, 0.92). At 7 T, SNRVW and CNR were significantly higher compared with 3-T MRI for both T1- (P < 0.001) and T2-weighted images (P < 0.05), with gain factors ranging from 1.3 to 3.6. ConclusionsUltrahigh-field 7-T MR carotid vessel wall imaging is feasible. 7-T MRI of the common carotid artery has comparable accuracy for determining luminal area and vessel wall area and has improved SNRVW and CNR compared with 3-T MRI. Therefore, ultrahigh-field 7-T vessel wall MRI may enable a more detailed assessment of plaque morphology.

[1]  M. Stuber,et al.  Initial results on in vivo human coronary MR angiography at 7 T , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  V. Fuster,et al.  Effects of aggressive versus conventional lipid-lowering therapy by simvastatin on human atherosclerotic lesions: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Valentin Fuster,et al.  Imaging of atherosclerosis: magnetic resonance imaging. , 2011, European heart journal.

[4]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[5]  J. H. C. Reiber,et al.  Automatic segmentation and plaque characterization in atherosclerotic carotid artery MR images , 2004, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[6]  C. Yuan,et al.  Scan‐rescan reproducibility of carotid atherosclerotic plaque morphology and tissue composition measurements using multicontrast MRI at 3T , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  Oliver Kraff,et al.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Renal MRI at 7 Tesla: Preliminary Results , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[8]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[9]  M. McConnell,et al.  Multicontrast black‐blood MRI of carotid arteries: Comparison between 1.5 and 3 tesla magnetic field strengths , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  Joachim E Wildberger,et al.  Reproducibility of Fibrous Cap Status Assessment of Carotid Artery Plaques by Contrast-Enhanced MRI , 2009, Stroke.

[11]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[12]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Toward cardiovascular MRI at 7 T: clinical needs, technical solutions and research promises , 2010, European Radiology.

[13]  V. Fuster,et al.  Lipid Lowering by Simvastatin Induces Regression of Human Atherosclerotic Lesions: Two Years’ Follow-Up by High-Resolution Noninvasive Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2002, Circulation.

[14]  K R Maravilla,et al.  Effects of Prolonged Intensive Lipid-Lowering Therapy on the Characteristics of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques In Vivo by MRI: A Case-Control Study , 2001, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[15]  M. van Buchem,et al.  Improved signal to noise in proton spectroscopy of the human calf muscle at 7 T using localized B1 calibration , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Oliver Kraff,et al.  A Transmit/Receive Radiofrequency Array for Imaging the Carotid Arteries at 7 Tesla: Coil Design and First In Vivo Results , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[17]  Peter R Luijten,et al.  Feasibility of 7 Tesla Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Determination of Intrinsic Sensitivity and High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging, and 1H-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[18]  Matthias Stuber,et al.  Assessment of the carotid artery by MRI at 3T: A study on reproducibility , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  R. Goebel,et al.  7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal‐to‐noise comparison in head images , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Peter Andersen,et al.  Whole‐body imaging at 7T: Preliminary results , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  R. Cury,et al.  Vulnerable Plaque Detection by 3.0 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[22]  Matthias Stuber,et al.  Right coronary MR angiography at 7 T: a direct quantitative and qualitative comparison with 3 T in young healthy volunteers. , 2010, Radiology.

[23]  Chun Yuan,et al.  Carotid plaque morphology and composition: initial comparison between 1.5- and 3.0-T magnetic field strengths. , 2008, Radiology.

[24]  Chun Yuan,et al.  Minimization of MR Contrast Weightings for the Comprehensive Evaluation of Carotid Atherosclerotic Disease , 2010, Investigative radiology.