Surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering nanostars for high-precision cancer imaging

Surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering gold nanostars allow detection of macro- and microscopic foci of premalignant and cancerous lesions in vivo. Seeing Nanostars Microscopic tumors may be difficult for the naked eye to see, but they are no match for nanosized imaging agents, which home in on cancerous tissues to signal the presence of disease. Harmsen and colleagues created a new generation of cancer imaging agents, called “surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering (SERRS) nanostars” −75-nm star-shaped gold cores wrapped in Raman reporter molecule-containing silica. When hit by a near-infrared laser, these nanostars emit a unique photonic signature (Raman “fingerprint”). The authors used a new silica encapsulation method and a reporter molecule that was “in resonance” with the laser, which meant that they shone nearly 400 times brighter than their “nonresonant” counterparts during Raman imaging. The SERRS nanostars were used to image macro- and microscopic malignant lesions in animal models of pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and sarcoma with high precision. As endoscopic and handheld Raman imaging devices are further developed for the clinic, the SERRS nanostars are sure to find a place in human tumor detection. The inability to visualize the true extent of cancers represents a significant challenge in many areas of oncology. The margins of most cancer types are not well demarcated because the cancer diffusely infiltrates the surrounding tissues. Furthermore, cancers may be multifocal and characterized by the presence of microscopic satellite lesions. Such microscopic foci represent a major reason for persistence of cancer, local recurrences, and metastatic spread, and are usually impossible to visualize with currently available imaging technologies. An imaging method to reveal the true extent of tumors is desired clinically and surgically. We show the precise visualization of tumor margins, microscopic tumor invasion, and multifocal locoregional tumor spread using a new generation of surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering (SERRS) nanoparticles, which are termed SERRS nanostars. The SERRS nanostars feature a star-shaped gold core, a Raman reporter resonant in the near-infrared spectrum, and a primer-free silication method. In genetically engineered mouse models of pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and sarcoma, and in one human sarcoma xenograft model, SERRS nanostars enabled accurate detection of macroscopic malignant lesions, as well as microscopic disease, without the need for a targeting moiety. Moreover, the sensitivity (1.5 fM limit of detection) of SERRS nanostars allowed imaging of premalignant lesions of pancreatic and prostatic neoplasias. High sensitivity and broad applicability, in conjunction with their inert gold-silica composition, render SERRS nanostars a promising imaging agent for more precise cancer imaging and resection.

[1]  Sanjiv S Gambhir,et al.  Nanooncology: The future of cancer diagnosis and therapy , 2013, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[2]  Christopher H Contag,et al.  High-sensitivity, real-time, ratiometric imaging of surface-enhanced Raman scattering nanoparticles with a clinically translatable Raman endoscope device , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[3]  Jesse V Jokerst,et al.  A small animal Raman instrument for rapid, wide-area, spectroscopic imaging , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Christopher H Contag,et al.  A Raman-based endoscopic strategy for multiplexed molecular imaging , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Christian M. Metallo,et al.  Macropinocytosis of protein is an amino acid supply route in Ras-transformed cells , 2013, Nature.

[6]  Yang Liu,et al.  Quantitative surface-enhanced resonant Raman scattering multiplexing of biocompatible gold nanostars for in vitro and ex vivo detection. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  H. Maeda,et al.  The EPR effect for macromolecular drug delivery to solid tumors: Improvement of tumor uptake, lowering of systemic toxicity, and distinct tumor imaging in vivo. , 2013, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[8]  Sandra Vranic,et al.  Deciphering the mechanisms of cellular uptake of engineered nanoparticles by accurate evaluation of internalization using imaging flow cytometry , 2013, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[9]  Brian W. Pogue,et al.  Multichannel diffuse optical Raman tomography for bone characterization in vivo: a phantom study , 2012, Biomedical optics express.

[10]  J. Willmann,et al.  Molecular body imaging: MR imaging, CT, and US. Part II. Applications. , 2012, Radiology.

[11]  J. Willmann,et al.  Molecular body imaging: MR imaging, CT, and US. part I. principles. , 2012, Radiology.

[12]  R. Birke,et al.  The theory of surface-enhanced Raman scattering. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[13]  Hedvig Hricak,et al.  Molecular imaging for personalized cancer care , 2012, Molecular oncology.

[14]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Photoacoustic Tomography: In Vivo Imaging from Organelles to Organs , 2012, Science.

[15]  C. Brennan,et al.  A Brain Tumor Molecular Imaging Strategy Using A New Triple-Modality MRI-Photoacoustic-Raman Nanoparticle , 2011, Nature Medicine.

[16]  Sanjiv S Gambhir,et al.  Raman's “Effect” on Molecular Imaging , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Noriya Uedo,et al.  Autofluorescence imaging of early colorectal cancer , 2011, Journal of biophotonics.

[18]  Robert Sinclair,et al.  The Fate and Toxicity of Raman-Active Silica-Gold Nanoparticles in Mice , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[19]  G. Lloyd,et al.  Surface enhanced spatially offset Raman spectroscopic (SESORS) imaging – the next dimension , 2011 .

[20]  A. Moreira,et al.  Benign Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Human Sarcomas , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[21]  Les Irwig,et al.  Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical margins on local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[22]  Malte Buchholz,et al.  Stromal biology and therapy in pancreatic cancer , 2010, Gut.

[23]  J. Frangioni,et al.  Image-Guided Surgery Using Invisible Near-Infrared Light: Fundamentals of Clinical Translation , 2010, Molecular imaging.

[24]  T. Jackson,et al.  A Clathrin Independent Macropinocytosis-Like Entry Mechanism Used by Bluetongue Virus-1 during Infection of BHK Cells , 2010, PloS one.

[25]  Paul Timpson,et al.  Mutant p53 drives metastasis and overcomes growth arrest/senescence in pancreatic cancer , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  E. Holland,et al.  Modeling Adult Gliomas Using RCAS/t-va Technology. , 2009, Translational oncology.

[27]  Michael J Sailor,et al.  SERS‐Coded Gold Nanorods as a Multifunctional Platform for Densely Multiplexed Near‐Infrared Imaging and Photothermal Heating , 2009, Advanced materials.

[28]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Imaging in the era of molecular oncology , 2008, Nature.

[29]  S. Abrams,et al.  Altered Immune Function during Long-Term Host-Tumor Interactions Can Be Modulated to Retard Autochthonous Neoplastic Growth1 , 2007, The Journal of Immunology.

[30]  Pablo G. Etchegoin,et al.  Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering Enhancement Factors: A Comprehensive Study , 2007 .

[31]  C. Sander,et al.  Gene expression profiling of liposarcoma identifies distinct biological types/subtypes and potential therapeutic targets in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma. , 2007, Cancer research.

[32]  E. Clementi,et al.  Macropinocytosis: regulated coordination of endocytic and exocytic membrane traffic events , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[33]  E. Furth,et al.  Pathology of genetically engineered mouse models of pancreatic exocrine cancer: consensus report and recommendations. , 2006, Cancer research.

[34]  C. Sawyers,et al.  Context-dependent hormone-refractory progression revealed through characterization of a novel murine prostate cancer cell line. , 2005, Cancer research.

[35]  R. Hruban,et al.  Trp53R172H and KrasG12D cooperate to promote chromosomal instability and widely metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[36]  Michael Höckel,et al.  The hydra phenomenon of cancer: why tumors recur locally after microscopically complete resection. , 2005, Cancer research.

[37]  T. Graeber,et al.  Myc-driven murine prostate cancer shares molecular features with human prostate tumors. , 2003, Cancer cell.

[38]  S. Singletary Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[39]  Steven R. Emory,et al.  Probing Single Molecules and Single Nanoparticles by Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering , 1997, Science.

[40]  Paul Mulvaney,et al.  Synthesis of Nanosized Gold−Silica Core−Shell Particles , 1996 .

[41]  L. Chin,et al.  Role of the INK4a Locus in Tumor Suppression and Cell Mortality , 1996, Cell.

[42]  R. Cardiff,et al.  Induction of mammary tumors by expression of polyomavirus middle T oncogene: a transgenic mouse model for metastatic disease , 1992, Molecular and cellular biology.

[43]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Induction of angiogenesis during the transition from hyperplasia to neoplasia , 1989, Nature.