Decomposing experience-driven attention: Opposite attentional effects of previously predictive cues

A central function of the brain is to track the dynamic statistical regularities in the environment – such as what predicts what over time. How does this statistical learning process alter sensory and attentional processes? Drawing upon animal conditioning and predictive coding, we developed a learning procedure that revealed two distinct components through which prior learning-experience controls attention. During learning, a visual search task was used in which the target randomly appeared at one of several locations but always inside an encloser of a particular color – the learned color served to direct attention to the target location. During test, the color no longer predicted the target location. When the same search task was used in the subsequent test, we found that the learned color continued to attract attention despite the behavior being counterproductive for the task and despite the presence of a completely predictive cue. However, when tested with a flanker task that had minimal location uncertainty – the target was at the fixation surrounded by a distractor – participants were better at ignoring distractors in the learned color than other colors. Evidently, previously predictive cues capture attention in the same search task but can be better suppressed in a flanker task. These results demonstrate opposing components – capture and inhibition – in experience-driven attention, with their manifestations crucially dependent on task context. We conclude that associative learning enhances context-sensitive top-down modulation while it reduces bottom-up sensory drive and facilitates suppression, supporting a learning-based predictive coding account.

[1]  L. Kamin Attention-like processes in classical conditioning , 1967 .

[2]  K. Haberlandt,et al.  Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. , 1968, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[3]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[4]  J Miller,et al.  Components of the location probability effect in visual search tasks. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  H. Gibbons,et al.  The eyes have it , 1991, Nature.

[6]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Object perception , 1993 .

[8]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[9]  K. Shapiro,et al.  Personal names and the attentional blink: a visual "cocktail party" effect. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[11]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze , 1998 .

[12]  G D Logan,et al.  What is learned during automatization? II. Obligatory encoding of spatial location. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  V. Bruce,et al.  Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others , 1999 .

[15]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Gaze Perception Triggers Reflexive Visuospatial Orienting , 1999 .

[16]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Robust representations for faces: evidence from visual search. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  W. Schneider,et al.  Automatic attraction of attention to former targets in visual displays of letters , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  J. Pratt,et al.  Symbolic Control of Visual Attention , 2001, Psychological science.

[19]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Probability Cuing of Target Location Facilitates Visual Search Implicitly in Normal Participants and Patients with Hemispatial Neglect , 2002, Psychological science.

[20]  E. Wojciulik,et al.  Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  A. Yuille,et al.  Object perception as Bayesian inference. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  George Sperling,et al.  Long-lasting sensitization to a given colour after visual search , 2004, Nature.

[23]  Angela J. Yu,et al.  Uncertainty, Neuromodulation, and Attention , 2005, Neuron.

[24]  Stacy Eltiti,et al.  Selective target processing: Perceptual load or distractor salience? , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  P. Kendall,et al.  Threat-Related Attentional Bias in Anxious Youth: A Review , 2006, Clinical child and family psychology review.

[26]  H. Egeth,et al.  Attention on autopilot: Past experience and attentional set , 2006 .

[27]  Xiaolin Zhou,et al.  Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: The priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency , 2006, Brain Research.

[28]  Y. Bar-Haim,et al.  Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  David T. Neal,et al.  A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. , 2007, Psychological review.

[30]  Karl J. Friston Hierarchical Models in the Brain , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  Jim M. Monti,et al.  Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  Michael J. Constantino,et al.  Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations , 2008 .

[33]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Training attention: Interactions between central cues and reflexive attention , 2009 .

[34]  M. Grabowecky,et al.  Rapid eye-fixation training without eyetracking , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  The Role of Perceptual Load in Object Recognition , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Wim Notebaert,et al.  Adaptation by binding: a learning account of cognitive control , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  Y. Bar-Haim Research review: Attention bias modification (ABM): a novel treatment for anxiety disorders. , 2010, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[38]  Attention-based long-lasting sensitization and suppression of colors , 2010 .

[39]  Patryk A. Laurent,et al.  Value-driven attentional capture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Sheng He,et al.  Automatic frame-centered object representation and integration revealed by iconic memory, visual priming, and backward masking. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[41]  Hongjing Lu,et al.  Two forms of aftereffects induced by transparent motion reveal multilevel adaptation. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[42]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Canonical Microcircuits for Predictive Coding , 2012, Neuron.

[43]  Yuhong V. Jiang,et al.  Rapid acquisition but slow extinction of an attentional bias in space , 2012 .

[44]  Patryk A. Laurent,et al.  Generalization of value-based attentional priority , 2012, Visual cognition.

[45]  N. Amir,et al.  Attentional Bias Modification , 2013 .

[46]  R. Aslin Infant learning: Historical, conceptual, and methodological challenges. , 2014, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[47]  C. Folk,et al.  Conditional Automaticity in Response Selection , 2014, Psychological science.

[48]  Wei-Song Lin,et al.  A computational visual saliency model based on statistics and machine learning. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[49]  C. Bundesen,et al.  Automatic attraction of visual attention by supraletter features of former target strings , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[50]  Zhicheng Lin,et al.  Priming of awareness or how not to measure visual awareness. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[51]  S. Murray,et al.  More Power to the Unconscious , 2015, Psychological science.

[52]  C. MacLeod,et al.  The Attentional Bias Modification Approach to Anxiety Intervention , 2015 .

[53]  N. Fox,et al.  The effects of early foster care intervention on attention biases in previously institutionalized children in Romania. , 2015, Developmental science.

[54]  Takaki Komiyama,et al.  Learning enhances the relative impact of top-down processing in the visual cortex , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.