Increased Surgeon-specific Experience and Volume is Correlated With Improved Clinical Outcomes in Lumbar Fusion Patients

Study Design: The present study design was that of a single center, retrospective cohort study to evaluate the influence of surgeon-specific factors on patient functional outcomes at 6 months following lumbar fusion. Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent neurosurgical lumbar instrumented arthrodesis identified the present study population. Objective: This study seeks to evaluate surgeon-specific variable effects on patient-reported outcomes such as Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the effect of North American Spine Society (NASS) concordance on outcomes in the setting of variable surgeon characteristics. Summary of Background Data: Lumbar fusion is one of the fastest growing procedures performed in the United States. Although the impact of surgeon-specific factors on patient-reported outcomes has been contested, studies examining these effects are limited. Methods: This is a single center, retrospective cohort study analyzing a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent neurosurgical lumbar instrumented arthrodesis by 1 of 5 neurosurgery fellowship trained spine surgeons. The primary outcome was improvement of ODI at 6 months postoperative follow-up compared with preoperative ODI. Results: A total of 307 patients were identified for analysis. Overall, 62% of the study population achieved minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in ODI score at 6 months. Years in practice and volume of lumbar fusions were statistically significant independent predictors of MCID ODI on multivariable logistic regression (P=0.0340 and P=0.0343, respectively). Concordance with evidence-based criteria conferred a 3.16 (95% CI: 1.03, 9.65) times greater odds of achieving MCID. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that traditional surgeon-specific variables predicting surgical morbidity such as experience and procedural volume are also predictors of achieving MCID 6 months postoperatively from lumbar fusion. Independent of surgeon factors, however, adhering to evidence-based guidelines can lead to improved outcomes.

[1]  Srinivas K. Prasad,et al.  Clinical outcomes in revision lumbar spine fusions: an observational cohort study. , 2021, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[2]  Srinivas K. Prasad,et al.  Are Guidelines Important? Results of a Prospective Quality Improvement Lumbar Fusion Project , 2021, Neurosurgery.

[3]  Vikas Yellapu,et al.  Review of Physician Referrals to Orthopedic Spine versus Neurosurgery , 2020, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[4]  S. Burch,et al.  Outcomes and Quality of Life Improvement After Multilevel Spinal Fusion in Elderly Patients , 2019, Global spine journal.

[5]  V. Deviren,et al.  The impact of surgeon experience on perioperative complications and operative measures following thoracolumbar 3-column osteotomy for adult spinal deformity: overcoming the learning curve. , 2020, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[6]  Safdar N. Khan,et al.  Orthopaedic vs. Neurosurgery - Understanding 90-day Complications and Costs in patients undergoing Elective 1- to 2-Level Posterior Lumbar Fusions by Different Specialties. , 2019, World neurosurgery.

[7]  F. Girardi,et al.  The impact of anesthesia and surgical provider characteristics on outcomes after spine surgery , 2019, European Spine Journal.

[8]  Kang-Jun Yoon,et al.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression in Lumbar Canal and Lateral Recess Stenosis – The Surgical Learning Curve , 2019, Neurospine.

[9]  Hui-Zi Li,et al.  Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes in spine surgery: a dose-response meta-analysis. , 2018, Annals of translational medicine.

[10]  B. Qian,et al.  Comparison of Complications and Surgical Outcomes of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Between Junior Attending Surgeons and Senior Attending Surgeons. , 2018, World neurosurgery.

[11]  Kristin R. Archer,et al.  Drivers of Variability in 90-day Cost for Primary Single-level Microdiscectomy , 2018, Neurosurgery.

[12]  M. McGirt,et al.  Surgeon-Level Variability in Outcomes, Cost, and Comorbidity Adjusted-Cost for Elective Lumbar Decompression and Fusion , 2018, Neurosurgery.

[13]  C. B. Burns,et al.  Establishing benchmarks for the volume-outcome relationship for common lumbar spine surgical procedures. , 2017, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[14]  J. Oren,et al.  The Effect of Smoking on Spinal Fusion , 2017, International Journal of Spine Surgery.

[15]  E. Kaltenthaler,et al.  The Relationship between Hospital or Surgeon Volume and Outcomes in Lower Limb Vascular Surgery in the United Kingdom and Europe. , 2017, Annals of vascular surgery.

[16]  Ajit Jada,et al.  Volume-Outcome Relationship After 1 and 2 Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. , 2017, World neurosurgery.

[17]  N. Merchant,et al.  The Impact of Surgeon Volume on Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Meta-analysis , 2017, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[18]  A. Dhawan,et al.  Patient Outcomes as a Function of Shoulder Surgeon Volume: A Systematic Review. , 2017, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[19]  Kern Singh,et al.  Effect of Surgeon Volume on Complications, Length of Stay, and Costs Following Anterior Cervical Fusion , 2016, Spine.

[20]  J. Ratliff,et al.  Surgeon Procedure Volume and Complication Rates in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusions: Analysis of a National Longitudinal Database , 2014, Clinical spine surgery.

[21]  R. Karia,et al.  An Operative Complexity Index Shows Higher Volume Hospitals and Surgeons Perform More Complex Adult Spine Deformity Operations. , 2016, Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease.

[22]  Norma Terrin,et al.  Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  M. Carty,et al.  The influence of volume and experience on individual surgical performance: a systematic review. , 2015, Annals of surgery.

[24]  H. Yoshihara,et al.  National trends in the surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease: United States, 2000 to 2009. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[25]  R. Karia,et al.  Complication rates are reduced for revision adult spine deformity surgery among high-volume hospitals and surgeons. , 2013, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[26]  R. Betz,et al.  The effect of surgeon experience on outcomes of surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  B. Boszczyk,et al.  Experience of a fellowship in spinal surgery: a quantitative analysis , 2014, European Spine Journal.

[28]  Joseph A. Sclafani,et al.  Complications Associated With the Initial Learning Curve of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  T. Witham,et al.  The impact of provider volume on the outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2012, Neurosurgery.

[30]  R. Delamarter,et al.  Spinal Fusion in the United States: Analysis of Trends From 1998 to 2008 , 2012, Spine.

[31]  Richard L Skolasky,et al.  The Effects of Hospital and Surgeon Volume on Postoperative Complications After LumbarSpine Surgery , 2011, Spine.

[32]  M. Monticone,et al.  Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in Italian subjects with sub-acute and chronic low back pain , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[33]  K. Lindsay,et al.  Spine surgery training and competence of European Neurosurgical Trainees , 2009, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[34]  A. Sharan,et al.  Obesity and spine surgery: relation to perioperative complications. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[35]  A. Nordwall,et al.  The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[36]  M. Suarez‐Almazor,et al.  Use of health status measures in patients with low back pain in clinical settings. Comparison of specific, generic and preference-based instruments. , 2000, Rheumatology.

[37]  Robert A. Lew,et al.  Lumbar Laminectomy Alone or With Instrumented or Noninstrumented Arthrodesis in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Patient Selection, Costs, and Surgical Outcomes , 1997, Spine.