MULTIMODAL IMAGING FINDINGS AND MULTIMODAL VISION TESTING IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

Purpose: To investigate the interactions among multimodal imaging findings and multimodal vision testing in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Methods: Patients enrolled in a prospective study of neovascular age-related macular degeneration with at least 3 previous intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections. Each patient underwent multimodal fundus imaging including spectral domain optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence, and multimodal vision testing, including visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, reading speed, and microperimetry. Results: There were 73 eyes of 49 consecutive patients enrolled. Generalized estimating equations' modelling showed that the significant independent predictors of visual acuity were the area of confluent hypoautofluorescence and involvement of the foveal center with either granular or confluent hypoautofluorescence (P < 0.001). Contrast sensitivity was negatively correlated with the area of confluent hypoautofluorescence (P < 0.001), involvement of the foveal center with granular hypoautofluorescence (P = 0.017), and subfoveal choroidal thickness (P = 0.042). The only significant predictor of reading speed was the size of confluent hypoautofluorescence (P < 0.001). The size of the defect in the ellipsoid zone (P < 0.001) and the presence of intraretinal fluid (P = 0.045) were correlated with microperimetry score. Conclusion: Confluent absence of autofluorescence was a highly significant predictor of vision testing and serves as an easy parameter to obtain in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

[1]  Kang Zhang,et al.  Seven-year outcomes in ranibizumab-treated patients in ANCHOR, MARINA, and HORIZON: a multicenter cohort study (SEVEN-UP). , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[2]  M. Crossland,et al.  Relationship between fixation stability measured with MP‐1 and reading performance , 2013, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[3]  James Loughman,et al.  Visual Performance in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Undergoing Treatment with Intravitreal Ranibizumab , 2013, Journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  R. Spaide,et al.  Retinal pigment epithelial cell loss assessed by fundus autofluorescence imaging in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[5]  Usha Chakravarthy,et al.  Ranibizumab versus bevacizumab to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration: one-year findings from the IVAN randomized trial. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[6]  W. Freeman,et al.  HORIZON: an open-label extension trial of ranibizumab for choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[7]  C. Osmond,et al.  Microperimetric changes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with ranibizumab , 2012, Eye.

[8]  H. Ozdemir,et al.  Microperimetric changes after intravitreal bevacizumab injection for exudative age‐related macular degeneration , 2012, Acta ophthalmologica.

[9]  S. Binder,et al.  Comparing Treatment of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration with Sequential Intravitreal Avastin and Macugen Versus Intravitreal Mono-therapy–A Pilot Study , 2011, Current eye research.

[10]  C. Curcio,et al.  ANATOMICAL CORRELATES TO THE BANDS SEEN IN THE OUTER RETINA BY OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY: Literature Review and Model , 2011, Retina.

[11]  G. Rubin,et al.  Contrast sensitivity outcomes in the ABC Trial: a randomized trial of bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  R. Spaide,et al.  Fundus autofluorescence and visual acuity in central serous chorioretinopathy. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[13]  R. Schuchard,et al.  A Test of Face Discrimination Ability in Aging and Vision Loss , 2011, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[14]  P. Keane,et al.  Effects of retinal morphology on contrast sensitivity and reading ability in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  M. Varano,et al.  RETINAL FUNCTIONAL CHANGES MEASURED BY MICROPERIMETRY IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION TREATED WITH RANIBIZUMAB: 24-Month Results , 2010, Retina.

[16]  Richard B Rosen,et al.  INNER SEGMENT–OUTER SEGMENT JUNCTIONAL LAYER INTEGRITY AND CORRESPONDING RETINAL SENSITIVITY IN DRY AND WET FORMS OF AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION , 2010, Retina.

[17]  D. Squirrell,et al.  VISUAL OUTCOME AFTER INTRAVITREAL RANIBIZUMAB FOR WET AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A Comparison Between Best-Corrected Visual Acuity and Microperimetry , 2010, Retina.

[18]  C. Curcio,et al.  Reticular pseudodrusen are subretinal drusenoid deposits. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[19]  U. Schmidt-Erfurth,et al.  Morphological and functional analysis of the loading regimen with intravitreal ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[20]  C. Frennesson,et al.  Significant improvements in near vision, reading speed, central visual field and related quality of life after ranibizumab treatment of wet age‐related macular degeneration , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica.

[21]  C. Styles,et al.  FIRST VERSUS SECOND EYE INTRAVITREAL RANIBIZUMAB THERAPY FOR WET AMD , 2009, Retina.

[22]  L. Yannuzzi,et al.  TYPE 3 NEOVASCULARIZATION: The Expanded Spectrum of Retinal Angiomatous Proliferation , 2008, Retina.

[23]  R. Spaide AUTOFLUORESCENCE FROM THE OUTER RETINA AND SUBRETINAL SPACE: Hypothesis and Review , 2008, Retina.

[24]  B. Brown,et al.  Functional outcomes after multiple treatments with ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration beyond visual acuity , 2007, Clinical ophthalmology.

[25]  K. Eng,et al.  Ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration , 2006, Clinical interventions in aging.

[26]  Susan Schneider,et al.  Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  Donald C Fletcher,et al.  Visual Function in Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization Resulting From Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The Importance of Looking Beyond Visual Acuity , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[28]  Michael D Crossland,et al.  Preferred retinal locus development in patients with macular disease. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[29]  Ronald A Schuchard,et al.  Preferred retinal loci and macular scotoma characteristics in patients with age-related macular degeneration. , 2005, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[30]  M. Varano,et al.  Fixation pattern and macular sensitivity in eyes with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. A microperimetry study , 2003, Seminars in ophthalmology.

[31]  T. Kuyk,et al.  Visual factors and mobility in persons with age-related macular degeneration. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[32]  H. Grossniklaus,et al.  Clinicopathologic correlations of surgically excised type 1 and type 2 submacular choroidal neovascular membranes. , 1998, American journal of ophthalmology.

[33]  P. Campochiaro,et al.  Platelet-derived growth factor is an autocrine growth stimulator in retinal pigmented epithelial cells. , 1994, Journal of cell science.

[34]  R. Klein,et al.  The Wisconsin age-related maculopathy grading system. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[35]  I. Klock,et al.  Zonulae adherentes pore size in the external limiting membrane of the rabbit retina. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[36]  P. Campochiaro,et al.  Platelet-derived growth factor is chemotactic for human retinal pigment epithelial cells. , 1985, Archives of ophthalmology.

[37]  D S Loshin,et al.  Contrast Sensitivity: The Visual Rehabilitation of the Patient With Macular Degeneration , 1984 .

[38]  R S Nickerson,et al.  The Framingham Eye Study. I. Outline and major prevalence findings. , 1977, American journal of epidemiology.

[39]  Glenn J Jaffe,et al.  Baseline predictors for one-year visual outcomes with ranibizumab or bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[40]  S. Yoo,et al.  Retinal functional changes measured by microperimetry in neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with ranibizumab. , 2013, American journal of ophthalmology.

[41]  Mark Michels,et al.  Ranibizumab versus verteporfin photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Two-year results of the ANCHOR study. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[42]  A. Ginsburg,et al.  Contrast sensitivity predicts pilots' performance in aircraft simulators. , 1982, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.